民和盆地油页岩加热过程储集物性研究

doi:10.7657/XJPG20200204

新疆石油地质 ›› 2020, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (2): 158-163.doi: 10.7657/XJPG20200204

民和盆地油页岩加热过程储集物性研究

赵康安¹, 孙平昌¹^,²^,³(), 于丰宁¹, 柳蓉¹^,²^,³, 张道勇⁴

^1. 吉林大学地球科学学院,长春 130061
^2. 吉林省油页岩及共生能源矿产重点实验室,长春 130061
^3. 东北亚生物演化与环境教育部重点实验室,长春 130026
^4. 国土资源部油气资源战略研究中心,北京 100034

收稿日期:2019-11-23 修回日期:2019-12-16 出版日期:2020-04-01 发布日期:2020-04-07
通讯作者: 孙平昌 E-mail:sunpingchang@jlu.edu.cn
作者简介:赵康安（1996-）,男,甘肃兰州人,硕士研究生,地球化学,（Tel）18844078503（E-mail）969484288@qq.com
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金(41772092);国家自然科学基金(41402088);吉林省科技厅重点科技研发项目(20180201077SF)

Study on Reservoir Physical Properties of Oil Shale During Heating in Minhe Basin

ZHAO Kang’an¹, SUN Pingchang¹^,²^,³(), YU Fengning¹, LIU Rong¹^,²^,³, ZHANG Daoyong⁴

^1. School of Earth Sciences, Jilin University, Changchun, Jilin 130061, China
^2. Jilin Key Laboratory of Oil Shale and Coexisting Minerals, Changchun, Jilin 130061, China
^3. MOE Key Laboratory for Evolution of Past Life and Environment in Northeast Asia, Changchun, Jilin 130026, China
^4. Strategic Research Center of Oil＆Gas Resources, Ministry of Land ＆ Resources, Beijing 100034, China

Received:2019-11-23 Revised:2019-12-16 Online:2020-04-01 Published:2020-04-07
Contact: SUN Pingchang E-mail:sunpingchang@jlu.edu.cn

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

为明确加热排烃对油页岩储集物性的影响,选择民和盆地未成熟油页岩为研究对象,经低温干馏,利用裂缝三维扫描、高压压汞、低温氮气吸附、X射线衍射等分析手段,对不同加温阶段的油页岩样品进行储集物性分析,进而揭示油页岩加热过程中储集物性的演化规律。结果表明,在低温加热阶段（185~350 ℃）,油页岩少量排烃,油水产率和半焦产率变化较小;中温加热阶段（350~475 ℃）,油页岩大量排烃,油水产率和半焦产率大幅度上升;高温加热阶段（475~520 ℃）,油页岩残余排烃,油水产率和半焦产率基本不发生变化。在油页岩的加热过程中,随加热温度上升,裂缝数量逐渐增多,微小裂缝逐渐加宽并延伸,进而相互沟通连接形成大裂缝,且裂缝主要发育在层理面,垂直层理面方向并未产生明显裂缝;油页岩比表面积逐渐增大,孔隙由微孔向大孔转变,并且随着油页岩大量排烃,部分大孔互相连接沟通形成微裂缝;油页岩半焦的吸附量随着相对压力和温度的升高而升高,黏土含量减小,伊蒙混层中的蒙脱石构造坍塌,逐渐向伊利石转化,矿物颗粒减小,导致泥岩中产生微裂缝,从而使泥岩的孔隙度和渗透率增加。

关键词: 油页岩, 分阶段加热, 储集物性, 生烃, 低温干馏, 低温氮气吸附, 高压压汞实验, 孔隙演化

Abstract:

In order to study the influences of heated hydrocarbon expulsion process on reservoir physical properties of oil shale, selecting the immature oil shale in Minhe basin as the research object, reservoir physical properties of the oil shale samples in different heating stages are analyzed by means of 3D scanning observation of cracks, high-pressure mercury intrusion experiment, low temperature nitrogen adsorption and X-ray diffraction analysis after low temperature carbonization, and the evolution of oil shale reservoir physical properties during heating are further revealed. The results show that in the stage of low temperature heating (185-350 ℃), small amount of hydrocarbon is expulsed from the oil shale and the production rates of oil-water and semicoke change a little; in the stage of medium temperature heating (350-475 ℃), large amount of hydrocarbon is expulsed from the oil shale, the production rates of oil-water and semicoke significantly rise; in the stage of high temperature heating (475-520 ℃), residual hydrocarbon is expulsed and the production rates of oil-water and semicoke remain the same. During the heating process of the oil shale, as the temperature rises, the amount of cracks increases, micro-cracks widen and extend and then large fractures are formed. The fractures are mainly developed at the bedding surface and there are no obvious fractures on vertical bedding surface. The specific surface area of the oil shale gradually increases, micro pores become large pores. With the expulsion of hydrocarbon, partial large pores connect with each other and micro fractures are formed. The adsorption of the semicoke in the oil shale increases with the rise of relative pressure and temperature and the clay content decreases. The smectite in the illite/smectite formation gradually transforms into illite, the grain sizes of minerals desease, leading to the forming of micro fractures in mudstone and finally the porosity and permeability of mudstone increase.

Key words: oil shale, staged heating, reservoir physical property, hydrocarbon generation, low temperature carbonization, low temperature nitrogen adsorption, high-pressure mercury intrusion experiment, pore evolution

中图分类号:

TE112.23

赵康安, 孙平昌, 于丰宁, 柳蓉, 张道勇. 民和盆地油页岩加热过程储集物性研究[J]. 新疆石油地质, 2020, 41(2): 158-163.

ZHAO Kang’an, SUN Pingchang, YU Fengning, LIU Rong, ZHANG Daoyong. Study on Reservoir Physical Properties of Oil Shale During Heating in Minhe Basin[J]. Xinjiang Petroleum Geology, 2020, 41(2): 158-163.

图/表 7

表1

图1

图2

图3

表2

图4

表3

参考文献 16

[1]	刘一杉, 东晓虎, 闫林 , 等. 吉木萨尔凹陷芦草沟组孔隙结构定量表征[J]. 新疆石油地质, 2019,40(3):284-289.
	LIU Yishan, DONG Xiaohu, YAN Lin , et al. Quantitative characterization of pore structure of Lucaogou formation in Jimsar sag[J]. Xinjiang Petroleum Geology, 2019,40(3):284-289.
[2]	郭巍, 刘招君, 宋玉勤 , 等. 青海—甘肃民和盆地油页岩的成因类型及特征[J]. 地质通报, 2009,28(6):780-786.
	GUO Wei, LIU Zhaojun, SONG Yuqin , et al. Genetic type and features of oil shale in the Minhe basin,Qinghai-Gansu provinces,China[J]. Geological Bulletin of China, 2009,28(6):780-786.
[3]	刘招君, 董清水, 叶松青 , 等. 中国油页岩资源现状[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2006,36(6):869-876.
	LIU Zhaojun, DONG Qingshui, YE Songqing , et al. The situation of oil shale resources in China[J]. Journal of Jilin University(Earth Science Edition), 2006,36(6):869-876.
[4]	BRENDOW K . Global oil shale issues and perspectives[J]. Oil Shale, 2003,20(1):81-92.
[5]	ESEME E, URAI J L, KROOSS B M , et al. Review of mechanical properties of oil shales:implications for exploitation and basin modelling[J]. Oil Shale, 2007,24(2):159-174.
[6]	张盼盼, 刘小平, 王雅杰 , 等. 页岩纳米孔隙研究新进展[J]. 地球科学进展, 2014,29(11):1 242-1 249.
	ZHANG Panpan, LIU Xiaoping, WANG Yajie , et al. Research progress in shale nanopores[J]. Advances in Earth Science, 2014,29(11):1 242-1 249.
[7]	王斌, 孙卫, 白云云 , 等. 鄂尔多斯盆地姬塬地区长6₁段致密砂岩储集层成岩作用与孔隙演化[J]. 新疆石油地质, 2018,39(4):430-438.
	WANG Bin, SUN Wei, BAI Yunyun , et al. Diagenesis and pore evolution of tight sandstone reservoir of Chang 6₁ member in Jiyuan area,Ordos basin[J]. Xinjiang Petroleum Geology, 2018,39(4):430-438.
[8]	郭巍, 李成博, 宋玉勤 , 等. 民和盆地炭山岭油页岩特征及成矿控制因素分析[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2006,36(6):923-928.
	GUO Wei, LI Chengbo, SONG Yuqin , et al. Analysis on the characteristics of the oil shale in the Tanshanling area,Minhe basin and their mineralization controlling factors[J]. Journal of Jilin University(Earth Science Edition), 2006,36(6):923-928.
[9]	张先伟, 孔令伟 . 利用扫描电镜、压汞法、氮气吸附法评价近海黏土孔隙特征[J]. 岩土力学, 2013,34(增刊2):134-142.
	ZHANG Xianwei, KONG Lingwei . Study of pore characteristics of offshore clay by SEM and MIP and NA methods[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2013,34(Supp.2):134-142.
[10]	康志勤, 赵阳升, 孟巧荣 , 等. 油页岩热破裂规律显微CT实验研究[J]. 地球物理学报, 2009,52(3):842-848.
	KANG Zhiqin, ZHAO Yangsheng, MENG Qiaorong , et al. Micro-CT experimental research of oil shale thermal cracking laws[J]. Chinese Journal of Geophysics, 2009,52(3):842-848.
[11]	SING K S W . Reporting physisorption data for gas/solid systems with special reference to the determination of surface area and porosity[J]. Pure and Applied Chemistry, 1982,54(11):2 201-2 218.
[12]	严继民, 张启元, 高敬琮 . 吸附与凝聚:固体的表面与孔[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 1986.
	YAN Jimin, ZHANG Qiyuan, GAO Jingcong. Adsorption and coagulation:surface and pore of solid[M]. Beijing: Science Press, 1986.
[13]	ROUQUEROL J, AVNIR D, FAIRBRIGE C W , et al. Recommendations for the characterization of porous solids[J]. Pure and Applied Chemistry, 1994,66(8):1 739-1 758.
[14]	田英姿, 陈克复 . 用压汞法和氮吸附法测定孔径分布及比表面积[J]. 中国造纸, 2004,23(4):21-23.
	TIAN Yingzi, CHEN Kefu . Determination of pore size distribution and surface area of several materials using mercury porosimetry and gas adsorption[J]. China Pulp & Paper, 2004,23(4):21-23.
[15]	赵杏媛, 何东博 . 黏土矿物与页岩气[J]. 新疆石油地质, 2012,33(6):643-647.
	ZHAO Xingyuan, HE Dongbo . Clay minerals and shale gas[J]. Xinjiang Petroleum Geology, 2012,33(6):643-647.
[16]	王行信 . 蒙脱石的成岩演变与石油的初次运移[J]. 沉积学报, 1985,3(1):81-91.
	WANG Xingxin . Diagenetic evolution of montmorillonite and primary migration of petroleum[J]. Acta Sedimentologica Sinica, 1985,3(1):81-91.

民和盆地油页岩加热过程储集物性研究

Study on Reservoir Physical Properties of Oil Shale During Heating in Minhe Basin

RichHTML

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 7

参考文献 16

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	陈旋, 王居峰, 肖冬生, 刘俊田, 苟红光, 张华, 林霖, 李宏伟. 台北凹陷下侏罗统致密砂岩气成藏条件与勘探方向[J]. 新疆石油地质, 2022, 43(5): 505-512.
[2]	罗丽荣, 李剑锋, 杨伟伟, 马军, 李欢, 吴凯. 鄂尔多斯盆地伊陕斜坡长9烃源岩特征与生烃潜力[J]. 新疆石油地质, 2022, 43(3): 278-284.
[3]	王晔磊, 邱隆伟, 杨勇强, 吴宛秋, 杨保良, 乔雨鹏. 济阳坳陷义和庄—大王庄地区二叠系储集层成岩作用及孔隙演化[J]. 新疆石油地质, 2021, 42(6): 676-682.
[4]	闫高原, 张军建, 路冠文, 全方凯. 沁水盆地太原组—山西组页岩孔隙分形特征[J]. 新疆石油地质, 2021, 42(5): 548-553.
[5]	曹自成, 徐勤琪, 余腾孝, 秦华, 耿锋, 郝建龙, 邓尚. 二次生烃与古油藏原油裂解对油气成藏的意义——以塔里木盆地巴楚—麦盖提地区寒武系烃源岩为例[J]. 新疆石油地质, 2021, 42(2): 143-151.
[6]	范谭广. 三塘湖盆地哈尔加乌组火山岩储集层孔隙特征及成因[J]. 新疆石油地质, 2020, 41(6): 658-665.
[7]	李朝旭, 秦启荣, 田国庆, 孙靖虎, 崔涵, 邹开真. 靖边气田南部奥陶系马五₁₊₂亚段储集层成岩演化特征[J]. 新疆石油地质, 2020, 41(2): 172-179.
[8]	马万云, 迪丽达尔·肉孜, 李际, 廖健德, 王海静, 何丹. 准噶尔盆地南缘侏罗系烃源岩生烃特征[J]. 新疆石油地质, 2020, 41(1): 31-37.
[9]	陈玲玲1，2，孟庆涛1，2，刘招君1，2，徐银波3，孙平昌1，2，王克兵1，2. 柴达木盆地团鱼山地区石门沟组煤与油页岩沉积环境[J]. , 2018, 39(6): 1-1.
[10]	程志强1，王飞宇1，江涛2，任利兵1，吴子强1，谢红3. 二连盆地东北部下白垩统烃源岩有机相与生烃特征[J]. , 2018, 39(4): 1-1.
[11]	王斌1，孙卫1，白云云1，2，韩进1，3，刘登科1，张茜1. 鄂尔多斯盆地姬塬地区长61段致密砂岩储集层成岩作用与孔隙演化[J]. , 2018, 39(4): 1-1.
[12]	王小军1，王婷婷2，曹剑2. 玛湖凹陷风城组碱湖烃源岩基本特征及其高效生烃[J]. , 2018, 39(1): 1-1.
[13]	黄雪峰1，吴伟1，王星2，白万备1. 辽中凹陷古近系烃源岩特征及有机质丰度控制因素[J]. , 2016, 37(6): 1-1.
[14]	支东明1a，曹剑2，向宝力1b，秦志军1a，王婷婷2. 玛湖凹陷风城组碱湖烃源岩生烃机理及资源量新认识[J]. , 2016, 37(5): 1-1.
[15]	侯茂国1，查明1，陈洪2，高长海1，曲江秀1，丁修建1. 准噶尔盆地北三台凸起石炭系沉凝灰岩生烃潜力分析[J]. , 2016, 37(5): 1-1.