鄂尔多斯盆地古生界气藏含气饱和度定量解释——以伊陕斜坡东南部A井区为例

doi:10.7657/XJPG20260408

新疆石油地质 ›› 2026, Vol. 47 ›› Issue (4): 451-458.doi: 10.7657/XJPG20260408

鄂尔多斯盆地古生界气藏含气饱和度定量解释——以伊陕斜坡东南部A井区为例

陈占军¹(), 任战利², 高小平³, 刘宝平³, 于春勇⁴, 郝倩倩¹, 王富院¹

¹ 陇东学院石油化工学院，甘肃庆阳 745000
² 西北大学地质学系，西安 710069
³ 延长石油集团天然气公司，陕西延安 716099
⁴ 中国石油集团渤海钻探工程有限公司第一录井公司，天津 300280

收稿日期:2025-02-19 修回日期:2025-06-08 接受日期:2025-07-28 出版日期:2026-08-01 发布日期:2026-07-30
作者简介:陈占军（1982-），男，陕西鄠邑人，副教授，博士，致密油气藏勘探，（Tel）0934-8658670（Email）john_wudy@163.com
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金(421602015);甘肃省自然科学基金(23JRRM733);庆阳市自然科学基金(QY-STK-2022A-010)

Quantitative Interpretation of Gas Saturation in Paleozoic Gas Reservoirs in the Ordos Basin: Taking Well A Area in the Southeastern Yishaan Slope as an Example

CHEN Zhanjun¹(), REN Zhanli², GAO Xiaoping³, LIU Baoping³, YU Chunyong⁴, HAO Qianqian¹, WANG Fuyuan¹

¹ College of Petroleum and Chemical Engineering, Longdong University, Qingyang, Gansu 745000, China
² Department of Geology, Northwest University, Xi’an, Shaanxi 710069, China
³ Natural Gas Company, Shaanxi Yanchang Petroleum (Group) Co., Ltd., Yan’an, Shaanxi 716099, China
⁴ No.1 Mud Logging Company, Bohai Drilling Engineering Company Limited, CNPC, Tianjin 300280, China

Received:2025-02-19 Revised:2025-06-08 Accepted:2025-07-28 Published:2026-08-01 Online:2026-07-30

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

为了提高鄂尔多斯盆地古生界致密砂岩气藏储层流体饱和度定量解释精度，对储层物理性质及电性特征进行分析，发现先解释孔隙度与含水孔隙度，再解释含气饱和度具有可行性。重新推导阿尔奇公式，获得含水孔隙度与电阻率的解释方程，并得到地层条件下的地层水电阻率，不需要进行岩电实验和地层水电阻率测试。在此理论基础上，以伊陕斜坡东南部A井区为例，建立储层流体定量解释方法：首先，分析现有基础数据获取过程及主要误差原因，筛选流体散失最小的数据作为含水孔隙度的基础数据；其次，建立含水孔隙度与电阻率的交会图版，获取含水孔隙度解释方程；最后，根据孔隙度解释方程和含水孔隙度解释方程定量解释A井区储层的含气饱和度。新解释的含气饱和度与生产结果高度吻合，与单层试气结果符合率为95.14%。与阿尔奇公式解释结果相比，该解释方法降低了实验技术要求，且解释精度与分辨率均提高。该研究丰富了鄂尔多斯盆地致密砂岩气藏定量解释的理论，也可为其他区块致密砂岩气藏含气饱和度定量解释提供参考。

关键词: 鄂尔多斯盆地, 伊陕斜坡, 古生界, 致密砂岩气藏, 致密储层, 含水孔隙度, 含气饱和度

Abstract:

To enhance the quantitative interpretation accuracy of fluid saturation in the Paleozoic tight sandstone gas reservoirs in the Ordos Basin, the physical and electric properties of the reservoir were analyzed, indicating a feasibility to interpret porosity, water saturation and gas saturation in sequence. The Archie formula was re-derived to obtain an equation to represent water-bearing porosity and resistivity, and the in-situ resistivity of formation water was defined, without the necessity to perform litho-electric experiments and formation water resistivity tests. On the basis of the above theory, taking the Well A area in the southeastern Yishaan slope as an example, a quantitative interpretation approach of reservoir fluid was established. Firstly, the existing basic data acquisition process and the main error causes were analyzed, and the data with the minimum fluid loss were selected as the basic data for interpreting water-bearing porosity. Then, the crossplot of water-bearing porosity and resistivity was established, and the water-bearing porosity interpretation equation was formed. Finally, according to the porosity interpretation equation and the water-bearing porosity interpretation equation, the gas saturation of reservoirs in the Well A area was quantitatively interpreted. It is found that the obtained gas saturation is highly consistent with the production results, and is 95.14% coincident with the single-layer gas test results. Compared with the results from Archie formula, the proposed interpretation approach exhibits lower technical requirements for experiments, and achieves improvements in both accuracy and resolution. This research enriches the theory for quantitative interpretation of tight sandstone gas reservoirs in the Ordos Basin, and provides reference for quantitative interpretation of tight sandstone gas reservoirs in other areas.

Key words: Ordos Basin, Yishaan slope, Paleozoic, tight sandstone gas reservoir, tight reservoir, water-bearing porosity, gas saturation

中图分类号:

TE311.2

陈占军, 任战利, 高小平, 刘宝平, 于春勇, 郝倩倩, 王富院. 鄂尔多斯盆地古生界气藏含气饱和度定量解释——以伊陕斜坡东南部A井区为例[J]. 新疆石油地质, 2026, 47(4): 451-458.

CHEN Zhanjun, REN Zhanli, GAO Xiaoping, LIU Baoping, YU Chunyong, HAO Qianqian, WANG Fuyuan. Quantitative Interpretation of Gas Saturation in Paleozoic Gas Reservoirs in the Ordos Basin: Taking Well A Area in the Southeastern Yishaan Slope as an Example[J]. Xinjiang Petroleum Geology, 2026, 47(4): 451-458.

图/表 5

表1

图1

表2

图2

表3

A井区单层试气结果与解释结果对比"

井名	层位	砂体深度/m	压力系数	井口产量/ （m³·d^-1）	无阻流量/ （m³·d^-1）	产水量/ （m³·d^-1）	试气结果	声波时差/ （μs·m^-1）	地层真电阻率/ （Ω·m）	深侧向电阻率/ （Ω·m）	浅侧向电阻率/ （Ω·m）	孔隙度/%	地层真电阻率计算含水饱和度	深侧向电阻率计算含水饱和度	浅侧向电阻率计算含水饱和度	平均含水饱和度	含气饱和度	解释结果
Y291井	盒8段	2 446.63—2 453.13		0	0	0	干层	232.52	27.96	21.97	20.20	8.01	0.76	0.78	0.80	0.78	0.22	水层
Y105井	盒8段	2 564.38—2 569.13	0.76	3 870.00	3 870.00	0	差气层	218.42	43.66	142.95	107.22	6.02	0.80	0.40	0.48	0.56	0.44	差气层
Y118井	盒8段	2 590.00—2 597.50	0.80	3 309.00	3 757.00	0	差气层	229.77	1 103.90	255.86	81.95	7.62	0.12	0.24	0.43	0.26	0.74	气层
Z24井	山1段	2 731.25—2 740.50	0.88	9 132.00	15 074.00	0	气层	222.44	218.75	361.41	354.76	7.50	0.33	0.28	0.17	0.26	0.74	气层
Y386井	山1段	2 678.00—2 690.25	0.68	8 396.00	8 749.00	1.24	气层	225.61	152.76	325.25	292.06	8.08	0.36	0.27	0.17	0.27	0.73	气层
Y296井	山1段	2 744.25—2 755.25	0.84	13 922.00	23 572.00	0	气层	224.32	180.88	314.92	285.96	7.84	0.35	0.28	0.18	0.27	0.73	气层
Y318井	山1段	2 655.00—2 665.50	0.87	5 070.00	8 625.00	0	气层	226.85	137.94	229.51	206.11	8.30	0.37	0.31	0.21	0.29	0.71	气层
Y386井	山1段	2 711.13—2 723.13	0.73	7 364.00	11 580.00	0	气层	223.26	139.49	244.70	227.84	7.65	0.40	0.32	0.21	0.31	0.69	气层
Z31-3井	山2段	2 844.88—2 854.38	0.82	2 517.00	7 240.00	0	差气层	216.79	149.17	331.09	301.59	6.55	0.42	0.32	0.36	0.37	0.63	差气层
Y293井	山2段	2 752.38—2 757.13	0.79	3 136.00	3 249.00	0	差气层	218.86	80.65	75.49	62.88	6.79	0.54	0.59	0.71	0.61	0.39	差气层
Y362井	山2段	2 620.00—2 629.13	0.75	0	0	0.20	干层	198.92	160.66	251.50	226.06	4.47	0.59	0.53	0.60	0.57	0.43	干层
Z47井	山2段	2 855.88—2 867.13	0.85	10 989.00	28 406.00	0.24	气层	215.39	1 026.48	2 637.98	2 019.73	6.38	0.17	0.14	0.16	0.15	0.85	气层
Z5井	山2段	2 772.88—2 782.50	0.89	85 285.00	203 723.00	1.04	气层	204.68	182.58	1 085.55	1 042.13	5.14	0.48	0.25	0.26	0.33	0.67	差气层
Y750井	山2段	2 588.75—2 592.75		0	0	6.50	水层	192.02	108.22	247.94	183.74	3.67	0.87	0.65	0.81	0.77	0.23	水层
A33井	本溪组	2 849.63—2 852.25		0	0	2.10	干层	202.40	85.21	84.90	75.10	4.44	0.40	0.64	0.75	0.60	0.40	干层
Y292井	本溪组	2 654.88—2 671.13		0	0	3.20	干层	197.27	35.59	67.98	62.15	3.99	0.82	0.81	0.92	0.85	0.15	干层
Z22井	本溪组	3 002.50—3 011.13	1.01	60 819.00	447 540.00	1.07	气层	225.30	135.48	876.99	691.03	6.48	0.20	0.12	0.15	0.16	0.84	气层
Y479井	本溪组	2 829.38—2 835.00	1.10	153 891.00	301 165.00	0.65	气层	208.42	153.72	196.73	181.47	4.98	0.24	0.35	0.41	0.33	0.67	气层
Y743井	本溪组	2 952.00—2 954.50	0.98	10 388.00	24 245.00	0	气层	199.55	117.26	139.24	111.95	4.19	0.34	0.51	0.64	0.50	0.50	气层
Z6井	本溪组	2 792.50—2 796.75		0	0	10.20	水层	193.47	65.21	80.94	84.61	3.65	0.59	0.80	0.85	0.75	0.25	水层

表3

参考文献 27

[1]	杨克兵, 王竞飞, 马凤芹, 等. 阿尔奇公式的适用条件分析及对策[J]. 天然气与石油, 2018, 36(2):58-63.
	YANG Kebing, WANG Jingfei, MA Fengqin, et al. Analysis and countermeasures about applicable conditions of Archie’s formula[J]. Natural Gas and Oil, 2018, 36(2):58-63.
[2]	陈秀娟, 冯镇涛, 曾芙蓉, 等. 页岩地层测井岩性识别技术发展现状[J]. 新疆石油地质, 2024, 45(6):742-752.
	CHEN Xiujuan, FENG Zhentao, ZENG Furong, et al. Development status of logging-based lithology identification technology for shale formations[J]. Xinjiang Petroleum Geology, 2024, 45(6):742-752.
[3]	袁龙, 刘文强, 罗少成, 等. 基于声学参数和孔隙结构分类的深层储层饱和度计算方法[J]. 特种油气藏, 2024, 31(3):61-69. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-6535.2024.03.008
	YUAN Long, LIU Wenqiang, LUO Shaocheng, et al. A calculation method of deep tight reservoir saturation based on acoustic parameters and pore structure classification[J]. Special Oil & Gas Reservoirs, 2024, 31(3):61-69.
[4]	刘军, 钟洁, 倪振, 等. 基于机器学习的低含油饱和度砂岩储层参数预测:以准噶尔盆地夏子街油田夏77井区下克拉玛依组为例[J]. 石油实验地质, 2024, 46(5):1123-1134.
	LIU Jun, ZHONG Jie, NI Zhen, et al. Machine learning-based prediction of low oil saturation sandstone reservoir parameters:A case study of lower Karamay formation in Xia 77 well block of Xiazijie oilfield,Junggar Basin[J]. Petroleum Geology & Experiment, 2024, 46(5):1123-1134.
[5]	石军太, 曹敬添, 徐凤银, 等. 深部煤层气游离气饱和度计算模型及其应用[J]. 煤田地质与勘探, 2024, 52(2):134-146.
	SHI Juntai, CAO Jingtian, XU Fengyin, et al. A calculation model of free gas saturation in deep coalbed methane reservoirs and its application[J]. Coal Geology & Exploration, 2024, 52(2):134-146.
[6]	程丽, 严伟, 李娜. 陆相页岩储集层含水饱和度测井计算方法:以川东南复兴区块凉高山组为例[J]. 新疆石油地质, 2024, 45(3):371-377.
	CHENG Li, YAN Wei, LI Na. A logging-based method for calculating water saturation in continental shale reservoirs:A case study of Lianggaoshan formation in Fuxing block,southeastern Sichuan Basin[J]. Xinjiang Petroleum Geology, 2024, 45(3):371-377.
[7]	武娟, 罗仁泽, 雷璨如, 等. 基于大语言模型的致密砂岩储层测井含水饱和度预测[J]. 天然气工业, 2024, 44(9):77-87.
	WU Juan, LUO Renze, LEI Canru, et al. Prediction of water saturation in tight sandstone reservoirs from well log data based on the large language models(LLMs)[J]. Natural Gas Industry, 2024, 44(9):77-87.
[8]	TANG Wenqiang, XIONG Kun, PAN Chen, et al. Meet the needs of reservoir identification research of a typical Archie phenomenon[J]. Science Discovery, 2019, 7(2):87-91. doi: 10.11648/j.sd.20190702.16
[9]	游利军, 吴需要, 康毅力, 等. 致密砂岩电学参数的非阿尔奇现象[J]. 地球物理学进展, 2016, 31(5):2226-2231.
	YOU Lijun, WU Xuyao, KANG Yili, et al. Non-Archie phenomenon of the tight sandstone’s electrical parameters[J]. Progress in Geophysics, 2016, 31(5):2226-2231.
[10]	张帆, 闫建平, 李尊芝, 等. 碎屑岩阿尔奇公式岩电参数与地层水电阻率研究进展[J]. 测井技术, 2017, 41(2):127-134.
	ZHANG Fan, YAN Jianping, LI Zunzhi, et al. Analysis of rock electrical parameters and R_w in Archie formula for clastic rock[J]. Well Logging Technology, 2017, 41(2):127-134.
[11]	EDMONDSON H N. Archie’s law:Electrical conduction in clear,water-bearing rock[J]. The Technical Review, 1988, 36(3):4-13.
[12]	SCHARTZ L M, KIMMINAU S. Analysis of electrical conductivity in the grain consolidation model[J]. Geophysics, 1987, 52:1402-1411. doi: 10.1190/1.1442252
[13]	ROTHMAN D. Cellular automaton fluids:A model for flow in porous media[J]. Geophysics, 1988, 53:509-518. doi: 10.1190/1.1442482
[14]	CLAVIER C, COASTES G, DUMANOIR J. The theoretical and experimental basis for the “dual water” model for the interpretation of shale sands[J]. The Society of Petroleum Engineers Journal, 1984, 24:153-168. doi: 10.2118/6859-PA
[15]	KLEIN J D, SILL W R. Short note on electrical properties of artificial clay-bearing sandstone[J]. Geophysics, 1982, 47:1593-1605. doi: 10.1190/1.1441310
[16]	SERRA O. Fundamentals of well-log interpretation[M]. Elsevier, 1984.
[17]	ELLIS D V. Well logging for earth scientists[M]. Elsevier, 1987.
[18]	HERRICK D C, KENNEDY W D. Electrical efficiency:A pore geometric theory for interpreting the electrical properties of reservoir rocks[J]. Geophysics, 1994, 59(6):918-927. doi: 10.1190/1.1443651
[19]	KÜNTZ M, MARESHAL J C, LAVELLÉ P. Numerical estimation of electrical conductivity in saturated porous media wit a 2-D lattice gas[J]. Geophysics, 2000, 65(3):766-772. doi: 10.1190/1.1444775
[20]	杨克兵, 刘欢, 李士东, 等. 基于可动水孔隙度的岩石电阻率响应方程[J]. 国外测井技术, 2017, 38(3):22-25.
	YANG Kebing, LIU Huan, LI Shidong, et al. Rock resistivity response equation based on movable water porosity[J]. World Well Logging Technology, 2017, 38(3):22-25.
[21]	荆万学, 陈永吉. 浅探阿尔奇公式的物理学原型[J]. 测井技术, 1997, 21(4):289-291.
	JING Wanxue, CHEN Yongji. On the original physical model of Archie formula[J]. Well Logging Technology, 1997, 21(4):289-291.
[22]	丁次乾. 矿场地球物理[M]. 山东东营: 中国石油大学出版社, 2003.
	DING Ciqian. Mine geophysics[M]. Dongying,Shandong: China University of Petroleum Press, 2003.
[23]	邵德艳, 姜在兴, 夏斌, 等. H区块萨尔图油层水淹层解释方法研究及应用[J]. 测井技术, 2010, 34(1):51-54.
	SHAO Deyan, JIANG Zaixing, XIA Bin, et al. On the interpretation method of water flooded layers in Shaertu reservoir of H block and its application[J]. Well Logging Technology, 2010, 34(1):51-54.
[24]	刘福利. 哈萨克斯坦油田复杂储层饱和度计算方法研究[D]. 北京: 中国地质大学(北京), 2008.
	LIU Fuli. Saturation calculation method study of complex reservoir for oilfield in Kazakhstan[D]. Beijing: China University of Geosciences(Beijing), 2008.
[25]	SETZMANN U, WAGNER W. A new equation of state and tables of thermodynamic properties for methane covering the range from the melting line to 625K at pressures up to 1000 MPa[J]. Journal of Physical & Chemical Reference Data, 1991, 20:1061-1155.
[26]	岳中琦. 汶川地震与山崩地裂的极高压甲烷天然气成因和机理[J]. 地学前缘, 2013, 20(6):15-20.
	YUE Zhongqi. Cause and mechanism of highly compressed and dense methane gas mass for Wenchuan earthquake and associated rock-avalanches and surface co-seismic ruptures[J]. Earth Science Frontiers, 2013, 20(6):15-20.
[27]	张志松. 阿尔奇公式的理论本原[J]. 地球物理学进展, 2020, 35(4):1514-1522.
	ZHANG Zhisong. Theoretical roots of Archie formulas[J]. Progress in Geophysics, 2020, 35(4):1514-1522.

气区	a	m	b	n	R_w/（Ω·m）
A井区	1.000 0	1.885 0	1.037 9	1.901 3	0.06
B井区（第1次测量）	3.658 8	1.210 0	1.161 8	1.499 0	0.06
B井区（第2次测量）	1.042 6	1.845 0	0.944 7	1.862 4	0.05
C井区	1.004 1	1.013 8	1.654 0	1.228 0	0.03
D井区	1.401 2	1.350 0	1.081 7	4.168 2	0.04

层位	孔隙度解释方程	电阻率系列	含水孔隙度解释方程	aR_w/（Ω·m)	m	n
盒8段	$\varphi =0.141\Delta t-24.807$	地层真电阻率	${\varphi }_{w}=33.474{e}^{-0.513{R}_{t}}$	0.118 6	1.948 3	1.948 3
		浅侧向电阻率	${\varphi }_{w}=26.908{e}^{-0.496{R}_{s}}$	0.063 4	2.101 1	2.101 1
		深侧向电阻率	${\varphi }_{w}=29.844{e}^{-0.505{R}_{d}}$	0.091 2	1.980 6	1.980 6
山1段	$\varphi =0.181\Delta t-32.764$	地层真电阻率	${\varphi }_{w}=28.856{e}^{-0.454{R}_{t}}$	0.064 8	2.201 3	2.201 3
		浅侧向电阻率	${\varphi }_{w}=33.549{e}^{-0.559{R}_{s}}$	0.141 6	1.789 6	1.789 6
		深侧向电阻率	${\varphi }_{w}=28.760{e}^{-0.445{R}_{d}}$	0.060 9	2.245 6	2.245 6
山2段	$\varphi =0.116\Delta t-18.655$	地层真电阻率	${\varphi }_{w}=29.675{e}^{-0.477{R}_{t}}$	0.078 4	2.095 3	2.095 3
		浅侧向电阻率	${\varphi }_{w}=31.160{e}^{-0.451{R}_{s}}$	0.075 5	2.215 6	2.215 6
		深侧向电阻率	${\varphi }_{w}=25.618{e}^{-0.431{R}_{d}}$	0.042 3	2.322 6	2.322 6
本溪组	$\varphi =0.089\Delta t-13.520$	地层真电阻率	${\varphi }_{w}=40.143{e}^{-0.702{R}_{t}}$	0.272 4	1.424 7	1.424 7
		浅侧向电阻率	${\varphi }_{w}=34.432{e}^{-0.541{R}_{s}}$	0.156 8	1.766 8	1.766 8
		深侧向电阻率	${\varphi }_{w}=34.044{e}^{-0.567{R}_{d}}$	0.139 3	1.848 6	1.848 6

鄂尔多斯盆地古生界气藏含气饱和度定量解释——以伊陕斜坡东南部A井区为例

Quantitative Interpretation of Gas Saturation in Paleozoic Gas Reservoirs in the Ordos Basin: Taking Well A Area in the Southeastern Yishaan Slope as an Example

RichHTML

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 5

参考文献 27

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	陈朝兵, 牛森凯, 苑伯超, 张宇飞, 徐旺林, 刘峰, 刘翰林, 陈晴. 宁庆区块本溪组8号煤岩宏观类型识别及沉积环境分析[J]. 新疆石油地质, 2026, 47(4): 404-415.
[2]	刘婷, 魏涛, 段骁宸, 陈余陇卓, 吴德志, 朱玉双. 基于成岩相划分的低渗透储层有利区预测——以鄂尔多斯盆地H65区块延9段为例[J]. 新疆石油地质, 2026, 47(4): 416-424.
[3]	王勇, 贾秀容, 朱颜, 金芸芸, 熊健, 谢春安, 李恒权, 郭军参. 基于二维地震概率推演逐级约束的致密砂岩储层预测[J]. 新疆石油地质, 2026, 47(4): 488-495.
[4]	陈刚, 杨水胜, 刘宇琪, 白江. W油田致密油藏压驱增能机理及参数优化[J]. 新疆石油地质, 2026, 47(3): 314-324.
[5]	窦亮彬, 王汝旭, 程学彬, 权珊珊, 石洋, 张杰, 陈治文, 陈景杨. 酸液预处理及酸液用量对致密石灰岩裂缝扩展的影响[J]. 新疆石油地质, 2026, 47(3): 341-349.
[6]	范庆雄, 张创, 周雪, 王成龙, 李国庆, 程志林. 基于分形理论的致密砂岩孔隙结构与力学性质关系[J]. 新疆石油地质, 2026, 47(3): 350-360.
[7]	张海涛, 徐培裕, 寇小攀, 郭笑锴, 刘蝶, 刘昱柏, 田立立, 陈阵. 基于深层海相页岩气地层压力计算的保存条件评价——以鄂尔多斯盆地西缘乌拉力克组页岩气为例[J]. 新疆石油地质, 2026, 47(3): 361-368.
[8]	朱颜. 鄂尔多斯盆地旬宜地区古生界致密砂岩储层发育特征及主控因素[J]. 新疆石油地质, 2026, 47(2): 146-154.
[9]	陈波, 刘帅帅, 王义俊, 冷先刚, 雷启鸿, 李德胜, 王宁. 伴生气驱提高采收率可行性实验及注采优化——以鄂尔多斯盆地西233区长7组页岩油为例[J]. 新疆石油地质, 2026, 47(2): 184-191.
[10]	朱荣幸, 屈红军, 尹虎, 苏帅, 杨晓锋. 致密油藏开发前后流动单元变化规律刻画与应用[J]. 新疆石油地质, 2026, 47(2): 241-252.
[11]	罗京, 张雷, 张建伍, 潘星, 曹茜, 李磊, 严婷, 李腾. 深层煤岩储集层孔隙结构和储集性能——以鄂尔多斯盆地西南部山西组深层5号煤岩为例[J]. 新疆石油地质, 2025, 46(5): 531-543.
[12]	邹建栋, 谭习群, 张皎生, 李超, 刘俊刚, 吕伟, 赵海峰. 鄂尔多斯盆地侏罗系底水油藏顶部注CO₂重塑流场[J]. 新疆石油地质, 2025, 46(5): 560-566.
[13]	霍瑞麟, 李爱荣, 侯宾东, 尹帅, 谢红兵, 刘梦, 赵凯丽. 注水引发储集层流动单元变化研究——以鄂尔多斯盆地姬塬地区为例[J]. 新疆石油地质, 2025, 46(5): 575-581.
[14]	姜艺, 杨胜来, 白浩言, 陈颖莉, 梅青燕, 王蓓东. 致密砂岩气藏CO₂埋存及提高CH₄采收率[J]. 新疆石油地质, 2025, 46(5): 591-599.
[15]	黄有根, 郑小鹏, 张道锋, 胡薇薇, 何梦卿, 王冰. 鄂尔多斯盆地本溪组煤岩微观特征及气体赋存状态[J]. 新疆石油地质, 2025, 46(3): 253-262.