克拉玛依油田红浅区火驱燃烧前缘的确定

doi:10.7657/XJPG20200208

新疆石油地质 ›› 2020, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (2): 188-192.doi: 10.7657/XJPG20200208

克拉玛依油田红浅区火驱燃烧前缘的确定

高成国¹, 木合塔尔¹, 展宏洋¹, 王勇¹, 杨凤祥¹, 袁士宝²

^1. 中国石油新疆油田分公司勘探开发研究院,新疆克拉玛依 834000
^2. 西安石油大学石油工程学院,西安 710065

收稿日期:2019-05-28 修回日期:2019-08-23 出版日期:2020-04-01 发布日期:2020-04-07
作者简介:高成国（1987-）,男,黑龙江海伦人,工程师,稠油开发,（Tel）0990-6879532（E-mail）sxytgcg@petrochina.com.cn
基金资助:
国家科技重大专项(2016ZX05012-003);国家科技重大专项(2016ZX05055-002-002);中国石油科技重大专项(2017E-0408)

Monitoring and Description Methods of Fire Flooding Combustion Front in Hongqian Area, Karamay Oilfield

GAO Chengguo¹, null null¹, ZHAN Hongyang¹, WANG Yong¹, YANG Fengxiang¹, YUAN Shibao²

^1. Research Institute of Exploration and Development, Xinjiang Oilfield Company, PetroChina, Karamay, Xinjiang 834000, China
^2. School of Petroleum Engineering, Xi’an Shiyou University, Xi’an, Shaanxi 710065, China;

Received:2019-05-28 Revised:2019-08-23 Online:2020-04-01 Published:2020-04-07

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

火驱燃烧前缘的位置是火驱研究中的关注点,是正确认识火驱波及状态的保证。克拉玛依油田红浅火驱试验区采用测温井法、电磁法和数值模拟法监测燃烧前缘的位置,仍不能完全满足油田现场对于燃烧前缘快速确定的要求。通过对干式火驱室内实验和现场试验研究,建立原油酸值与燃烧前缘推进距离之间的线性关系式,利用此关系式计算燃烧前缘位置;火驱现场相邻2口注气井压力同步变化,反映了燃烧腔相互连通,基于原油酸值和注气井压力变化特征,建立确定燃烧前缘的原油酸值—压力法。2016年底,上倾方向的燃烧前缘到达一线生产井,下倾方向燃烧前缘越过一线生产井,燃烧腔大部分连通。最后通过电磁法和测温井法对燃烧前缘描述结果进行了验证,认为利用原油酸值—压力法计算的燃烧前缘位置结论可靠,能够准确反映油藏燃烧前缘推进情况。

关键词: 准噶尔盆地, 红浅火驱试验区, 火烧油层, 燃烧前缘, 原油酸值, 注入压力

Abstract:

The position of combustion front is the focus of fire flooding research, and it is also the guarantee of the correct understanding about fire flooding sweep status. In Hongqian fire flooding pilot test area of Xinjiang, thermometric well method, electromagnetic method and numerical simulation method are used to monitor the position of combustion front, but these methods can’t fully meet the requirement of fast and accurate determination of the combustion front in the oilfield. Based on the laboratory experiment and in-situ test of dry fire flooding, a linear relationship between the acid value of crude oil and advancing distance of combustion front is established, and then the position of combustion front is calculated with the relationship. The synchronous change of the pressures in two adjacent gas injection wells in fire flooding field reflects an important characteristic of the interconnection of the two combustion chambers. Based on the variations of crude oil acid value and pressure, the crude oil acid value-pressure method for combustion front description is established. The combustion front positions at different times are described by using the acid value-pressure method according to the acid value and injection pressure obtained from the Hongqian fire flooding pilot test area in Xinjiang. By the end of 2016, the combustion front in the up-dipping direction had reached the producers, that in the down-dipping direction had gone beyond the producers, and most combustion chambers had been connected. Finally, the results of fire line description are verified by electromagnetic method and thermometric well method. It is concluded that the calculation of the combustion front position with the acid value-pressure method is reliable, which can accurately reflect the advancement of the combustion front.

Key words: Junggar basin, Hongqian fire flooding pilot test area, in-situ combustion, combustion front, crude oil acid value, injection pressure

中图分类号:

T345

高成国, 木合塔尔, 展宏洋, 王勇, 杨凤祥, 袁士宝. 克拉玛依油田红浅区火驱燃烧前缘的确定[J]. 新疆石油地质, 2020, 41(2): 188-192.

GAO Chengguo, null null, ZHAN Hongyang, WANG Yong, YANG Fengxiang, YUAN Shibao. Monitoring and Description Methods of Fire Flooding Combustion Front in Hongqian Area, Karamay Oilfield[J]. Xinjiang Petroleum Geology, 2020, 41(2): 188-192.

图/表 4

参考文献 17

[1]	师耀利, 吕世瑶, 施小荣 , 等. 火驱油藏岩矿与原油演化特征[J]. 新疆石油地质, 2018,39(6):696-700.
	SHI Yaoli, LYU Shiyao, SHI Xiaorong , et al. Evolution of rocks and crude oil in resevoirs during fire flooding[J]. Xinjiang Petroleum Geology, 2018,39(6):696-700.
[2]	梁建军, 计玲, 蒋西平 , 等. 克拉玛依油田红浅火驱先导试验区火驱开发节能效果[J]. 新疆石油地质, 2017,38(5):599-601.
	LIANG Jianjun, JI Ling, JIANG Xiping , et al. Energy-saving effect of fire flooding development in Hongqian pilot test area of Karamay oilfield[J]. Xinjiang Petroleum Geology, 2017,38(5):599-601.
[3]	AKKUTLU I Y, YORTSOS Y C . Steady-state propagation of in-situ combustion fronts with sequential reactions[R]. SPE International Petroleum Conference in Mexico, 2004.
[4]	BRANCH M C, NESS R . Combustion front propagation through fractured oil shale[R]. SPE Annual Fall Technical Conference and Exhibition in New Orleans,Louisiana, 1976.
[5]	BAGCI S, KOK M V . In-situ combustion laboratory studies of Turkish heavy oil reservoirs[J]. Fuel Processing Technology, 2001,74(2):65-79.
[6]	LIANG Jinzhong, GUAN Wenlong, WU Yongbin , et al. Combustion front expanding characteristic and risk analysis of THAI process[R]. International Petroleum Technology Conference in Beijing,China, 2013.
[7]	GARTHOFFNER E H . Combustion front and burned zone growth in successful California ISC projects[R]. SPE Western Regional Meeting in Garden Grove,California, 1998.
[8]	DRUGANOVA E, SURGUCHEV L M, IBATULLIN R R . Air injection at Mordovo-Karmalskoye field:simulation and IOR evaluation [R]. SPE Russian Oil and Gas Conference and Exhibition in Moscow,Russia, 2010.
[9]	DAYAL H S, BHUSHAN B V, MITRA S , et al. Simulation of in-situ combustion process in Balol pilot [R]. SPE Oil and Gas India Conference and Exhibition in Mumbai,India, 2012.
[10]	袁士宝, 蒋海岩, 李秀明 , 等. 示踪剂辅助判断多井组火驱燃烧前缘位置[J]. 油气地质与采收率, 2014,21(3):52-54.
	YUAN Shibao, JIANG Haiyan, LI Xiuming , et al. New method to determine position of combustion front for in-situ combustionin the multiple well groups[J]. Petroleum Geology and Recovery Efficiency, 2014,21(3):52-54.
[11]	DIYASHEV R N, GALEEV R G, KONDRASHKIN V F , et al. Surface control on thermal front movement in fireflooding process[R]. SPE International Thermal Operations Symposium in Bakersfield,California, 1993.
[12]	BURGER J G, SAHUQUET B C . Laboratory research on wet combustion[J]. Journal of Petroleum Technology, 1973,25(10):1 137-1 146.
[13]	LEE D G, NOURELDIN N A . Effect of water on the low-temperature oxidation of heavy oil[J]. Energy Fuels, 1989,3(6):713-715.
[14]	BOJES J M, WRIGHT G B . Application of fluid analyses to the operation of an in situ combustion pilot[J]. Journal of Canadian Petroleum Technology, 1989,28(1):106-119.
[15]	SARATHI P S . In-situ combustion handbook: principles and practices[R]. Office of Scientific & Technical Information Technical Reports, 1999.
[16]	ZHAO Renbao, SUN Jindi, FANG Qiang , et al. Evolution of acidic compounds in crude oil during in situ combustion[J]. Energy & Fuels, 2017,31(6):5 926-5 932.
[17]	YUAN Shibao, JIANG Haiyan, YANG Fengxiang , et al. Research on characteristics of fire flooding zones based on core analysis[J]. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 2018,170:607-610.

克拉玛依油田红浅区火驱燃烧前缘的确定

Monitoring and Description Methods of Fire Flooding Combustion Front in Hongqian Area, Karamay Oilfield

RichHTML

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 4

参考文献 17

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	阿力甫江·热合木吐力, 潘龙, 李献民, 林娟, 马晶晶, 窦强峰. 基于双平方根算子的速度建模方法及应用[J]. 新疆石油地质, 2023, 44(1): 119-124.
[2]	况昊, 周润驰, 王钧民, 刘豪, 谭先锋, 蔡鑫勇, 肖振兴. 玛湖凹陷与沙湾凹陷上乌尔禾组储集层差异及成因[J]. 新疆石油地质, 2023, 44(1): 18-24.
[3]	何海清, 唐勇, 邹志文, 郭华军, 徐洋, 李亚哲. 准噶尔盆地中央坳陷西部风城组岩相古地理及油气勘探[J]. 新疆石油地质, 2022, 43(6): 640-653.
[4]	唐勇, 雷德文, 曹剑, 刘寅, 黄立良, 李卉. 准噶尔盆地二叠系全油气系统与源内天然气勘探新领域[J]. 新疆石油地质, 2022, 43(6): 654-662.
[5]	何文军, 宋永, 汤诗棋, 尤新才, 白雨, 赵毅. 玛湖凹陷二叠系风城组全油气系统成藏机理[J]. 新疆石油地质, 2022, 43(6): 663-673.
[6]	龚德瑜, 刘海磊, 杨海波, 李宗浩, 王瑞菊, 吴卫安. 准噶尔盆地风城组烃源岩生气潜力与天然气勘探领域[J]. 新疆石油地质, 2022, 43(6): 674-683.
[7]	蒋文龙, 阿布力米提·依明, 卞保力, 王韬, 任海姣, 韩杨. 准噶尔盆地西北缘风城组烃源岩热演化生物标志化合物变化及意义[J]. 新疆石油地质, 2022, 43(6): 684-692.
[8]	钱门辉, 王绪龙, 黎茂稳, 李志明, 冷筠莹, 孙中良. 玛页1井风城组页岩含油性与烃类赋存状态[J]. 新疆石油地质, 2022, 43(6): 693-703.
[9]	单祥, 窦洋, 晏奇, 陈希光, 彭博, 易俊峰. 玛南斜坡区风城组致密油藏储集层特征及控制因素[J]. 新疆石油地质, 2022, 43(6): 704-713.
[10]	雷海艳, 齐婧, 周妮, 陈俊, 孟颖, 张锡新, 陈锐兵. 玛湖凹陷玛页1井风城组富硅页岩成因及其油气意义[J]. 新疆石油地质, 2022, 43(6): 724-732.
[11]	刘财广, 季瑞雪, 王伟, 张融. 玛湖凹陷风城组页岩油产量影响因素及甜点评价[J]. 新疆石油地质, 2022, 43(6): 733-742.
[12]	吕焕泽, 邹妞妞, 蔡宁宁, 黄永志, 宁诗坦, 朱彪. 玛湖凹陷北斜坡百口泉组碳酸盐胶结物形成机理及其地质意义[J]. 新疆石油地质, 2022, 43(5): 554-562.
[13]	王亚如, 张昌民, 冀冬升, 朱锐, 付文俊, 王泽宇, 刘家乐. 齐古断褶带头屯河组—清水河组地球化学特征及古环境[J]. 新疆石油地质, 2022, 43(5): 563-571.
[14]	王泉, 王彬, 闫利恒, 汪洋, 罗建新, 杜果. 呼探1井井口压力波动特征及成因机理[J]. 新疆石油地质, 2022, 43(5): 587-591.
[15]	于洪洲, 王越, 周健, 薛雁. 准噶尔盆地西北缘哈山地区二叠系风城组沉积体系[J]. 新疆石油地质, 2022, 43(4): 396-403.