›› 2015, Vol. 36 ›› Issue (4): 1-1.doi: 10.7657/XJPG20150415

• 论文 •    

新疆油田红浅1井区火驱开采效果评价

张霞林1,关文龙1,刁长军2,席长丰1   

  1. (1.中国石油 勘探开发研究院,北京 100083;2.中国石油 新疆油田分公司 勘探开发研究院,新疆 克拉玛依 834000)
  • 出版日期:2019-01-01 发布日期:1905-07-14

Evaluation of Recovery Effect in Hongqian1Wellblock by InSitu Combustion Process in Xinjiang Oilfield

ZHANG Xialin1, GUAN Wenlong1, DIAO Changjun2, XI Changfeng1   

  1. (1. Research Institute of Petroleum Exploration and Development, PetroChina, Beijing100083, China;2.Research Institute of Exploration and Development, Xinjiang Oilfield Company, PetroChina, Karamay, Xinjiang834000, China)
  • Online:2019-01-01 Published:1905-07-14

摘要: 以新疆油田红浅1井区火驱先导试验为例,分别利用广义产量递减法和油藏数值模拟法对注蒸汽开发后期转火驱开采效果进行了评价。结果表明,红浅1井区火驱先导试验区在注蒸汽开采之后,通过火驱的接替开采,最终采收率可达到59.9%,火驱阶段至少可提高采收率30.0%. 两种方法的对比应用表明,广义产量递减法评价火驱开采效果是切实可行的;广义产量递减法较油藏数值模拟法所需资料较少,更为简捷实用。

Abstract: Taking the in?situ combustion pilot test in Wellblock Hongqian?1in Xinjiang oilfield as an example, the recovery effect by in?situ combustion process converted from steam injection process including steam stimulation and steam drive is evaluated using generalized production decline and numerical simulation methods. The results show that the steam injection followed by in?situ combustion process applied in this pilot test area has obtained ultimate recovery efficiency of59.9%, of which in?situ combustion stage can get at least30%of the EOR. Also, the comparison of these two methods indicates that the generalized production decline method is actually feasible for evaluation of in?situ combustion recovery effect, less data are needed than numerical simulation method, and more simple to use

中图分类号: