准噶尔盆地南缘呼图壁背斜变形机理物理模拟实验

doi:10.7657/XJPG20200115

新疆石油地质 ›› 2020, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (1): 120-126.doi: 10.7657/XJPG20200115

• 应用技术 • 上一篇

准噶尔盆地南缘呼图壁背斜变形机理物理模拟实验

张希晨¹, 马德龙¹(), 魏凌云², 王宏斌¹, 王彦君¹, 刘文强¹, 杨秀磊¹

1.中国石油 a.油藏描述重点实验室;b.勘探开发研究院西北分院,兰州 730020
2.中国石油新疆油田分公司勘探开发研究院地球物理研究所,乌鲁木齐 830013

收稿日期:2019-12-05 修回日期:2019-12-22 出版日期:2020-02-01 发布日期:2020-03-31
通讯作者: 马德龙 E-mail:zhenmadelong@126.com
作者简介:张希晨（1993-），男，河北涿州人，助理工程师，硕士，构造地质，（Tel）0931-86866617（E-mail）zhangxchen@petrochina.com.cn
基金资助:
国家油气重大专项(2016ZX05003-002);国家油气重大专项(2016ZX05003-005)

Deformation Mechanism of Hutubi Anticline in the Southern Margin of Junggar Basin: Insights From Physical Simulation Experiment

ZHANG Xichen¹, MA Delong¹(), WEI Lingyun², WANG Hongbin¹, WANG Yanjun¹, LIU Wenqiang¹, YANG Xiulei¹

1.PetroChina, a.Key Laboratory of Reservoir Description; b.Northwest Branch, Research Institute of Petroleum Exploration and Development, Lanzhou, Gansu 730020, China
2.Geophysics Institute, Research Institute of Exploration and Development, Xinjiang Oilfield Company, PetroChina, Urumqi, Xinjiang 830013, China

Received:2019-12-05 Revised:2019-12-22 Online:2020-02-01 Published:2020-03-31
Contact: MA Delong E-mail:zhenmadelong@126.com

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

准噶尔盆地南缘褶皱—冲断带具有多期叠加变形的特点,呼图壁背斜位于逆冲前缘,虽然距离天山较远,在剖面上却发育双层构造形态:深层为二叠系断陷—古隆起结构,浅层为侏罗系及上覆层断背斜构造,两者垂向叠置。为了明确呼图壁浅层背斜形成主控因素以及深层和浅层垂向叠置的变形机理,在明确构造样式和变形规律的基础上,设计5组模型,采用控制变量和对比分析的方法进行物理模拟实验研究。结果表明,大断陷—古隆起模型控制下的实验结果与地震剖面形态相似,断陷边缘古隆起作为主控因素,诱使上覆层优先变形发育背斜,证明呼图壁背斜深层和浅层构造具有时空耦合关系。浅层背斜的发育形态还受到下伏断陷规模、上覆层厚度和同构造沉积作用的联合控制。通过物理模拟实验揭示垂向叠置构造关联和变形机理科学有效,为指导准噶尔盆地南缘前陆地区的勘探生产提供更多依据。

关键词: 准噶尔盆地, 呼图壁背斜, 变形机理, 物理模拟, 先存断陷, 古隆起, 上覆层厚度, 同构造沉积, 控制因素

Abstract:

The fold-thrust belts in the southern margin of Junggar basin are characterized by multi-stage superimposition and deformation. The Hutubi anticline located in the front of the thrust is far away from the Tianshan Mountains and shows a double-layer structure, among which the deep layer is a Permian fault-depression-paleohigh and the shallow layer is a fault anticline of Jurassic with its overlying strata. To investigate the main controls on the shallow anticline formation and the vertical deformation mechanism of the Hutubi anticline, 5 groups of models are designed to perform physical simulation study by using control variable and comparative analysis methods on the basis of the identification of structural style and deformation laws. The study results show that the experimental result of the fault-depression-paleohigh model is similar to the seismic interpretation result. As the main controlling factor, the paleohigh in the fault-depression margin induced the overlying strata to deform into anticlines, which can prove the time-space coupling relations between the deep layer and shallow layer in the Hutubi anticline. The shape of the shallow anticline is also controlled by the combination of the scale of the underlying fault-depression, the thickness of the overlying strata and the syntectonic sedimentation. It is a scientific and effective method to reveal the correlation and deformation mechanism of vertical superimposed structures by using physical simulation experiments, which could provide more basis for petroleum exploration and production in the foreland area of the southern margin of Junggar basin.

Key words: Junggar basin, Hutubi anticline, deformation mechanism, physical simulation, pre-existing fault-depression, paleohigh, overly- ing layer thickness, syntectonic sedimentation, controlling factor

中图分类号:

P542.2

张希晨, 马德龙, 魏凌云, 王宏斌, 王彦君, 刘文强, 杨秀磊. 准噶尔盆地南缘呼图壁背斜变形机理物理模拟实验[J]. 新疆石油地质, 2020, 41(1): 120-126.

ZHANG Xichen, MA Delong, WEI Lingyun, WANG Hongbin, WANG Yanjun, LIU Wenqiang, YANG Xiulei. Deformation Mechanism of Hutubi Anticline in the Southern Margin of Junggar Basin: Insights From Physical Simulation Experiment[J]. Xinjiang Petroleum Geology, 2020, 41(1): 120-126.

图/表 7

图1

图2

表1

表2

图3

图4

图5

参考文献 21

[1]	AVOUAC J P, TAPPONNIER P, BAI M , et al. Active thrusting and folding along the northern Tien Shan and Late Cenozoic rotation of the Tarim relative to Dzungaria and Kazakhstan[J]. Journal of Geophysical Research, 1993,98(B4):6 755-6 804.
[2]	杨迪生, 肖立新, 阎桂华 , 等. 准噶尔盆地南缘四棵树凹陷构造特征与油气勘探[J]. 新疆石油地质, 2019,40(2):138-144.
	YANG Disheng, XIAO Lixin, YAN Guihua , et al. Structural characteristics and petroleum exploration in Sikeshu sag,southern margin of Junggar basin[J]. Xinjiang Petroleum Geology, 2019,40(2):138-144.
[3]	何登发, 李德生, 王成善 , 等. 中国沉积盆地深层构造地质学的研究进展与展望[J]. 地学前缘, 2017,24(3):219-233.
	HE Dengfa, LI Desheng, WANG Chengshan , et al. Advances and challenge of structural geology of deep sedimentary basins in China[J]. Earth Science Frontiers, 2017,24(3):219-233.
[4]	贾承造, 庞雄奇 . 深层油气地质理论研究进展与主要发展方向[J]. 石油学报, 2015,36(12):1 457-1 469.
	JIA Chengzao, PANG Xiongqi . Research progress and main development directions of deep hydrocarbon geological theories[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2015,36(12):1 457-1 469.
[5]	马德龙, 何登发, 魏东涛 , 等. 准噶尔盆地南缘古牧地背斜多期构造变形特征[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2017,47(6):1 695-1 704.
	MA Delong, HE Dengfa, WEI Dongtao , et al. Multiple phase deformation of Gumudi anticline at south margin of Junggar basin[J]. Journal of Jilin University(Earth Science Edition), 2017,47(6):1 695-1 704.
[6]	陈书平, 漆家福, 于福生 , 等. 准噶尔盆地南缘构造变形特征及其主控因素[J]. 地质学报, 2007,81(2):151-157.
	CHEN Shuping, QI Jiafu, YU Fusheng , et al. Deformation characteristics in the southern margin of the Junggar basin and their controlling factors[J]. Acta Geologica Sinica, 2007,81(2):151-157.
[7]	李忠权, 张寿庭, 应丹琳 , 等. 准噶尔盆地南缘托斯台地区构造特征研究[J]. 成都理工大学学报(自然科学版), 2010,37(6):593-598.
	LI Zhongquan, ZHANG Shouting, YING Danlin , et al. The characteristics of the structure section in Tuositai region on the south edge of Junggar basin,Xinjiang,China[J]. Journal of Chengdu University of Technology(Science & Technology Edition), 2010,37(6):593-598.
[8]	马德龙, 袁剑英, 张虎权 , 等. 基于高密度地震反射和砂箱实验的准噶尔盆地南缘霍尔果斯背斜深层构造解析[J]. 中国石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2018,42(6):9-18.
	MA Delong, YUAN Jianying, ZHANG Huquan , et al. Deep structure analysis of Huoerguosi anticline at the southern margin of Junggar basin based on high-density seismic reflection and sandbox modeling[J]. Journal of China University of Petroleum(Edition of Natural Science), 2018,42(6):9-18.
[9]	卢华复, 王胜利, 贾承造 . 准噶尔南缘新生代断裂的形成机制[J]. 地学前缘, 2007,14(4):168-174.
	LU Huafu, WANG Shengli, JIA Chengzao . The mechanism of the southern Junggar Cenozoic thrusts[J]. Earth Science Frontiers, 2007,14(4):168-174.
[10]	于福生, 李国志, 杨光达 , 等. 准噶尔盆地南缘褶皱—冲断带变形特征及成因机制模拟[J]. 大地构造与成矿学, 2009,33(3):386-395.
	YU Fusheng, LI Guozhi, YANG Guangda , et al. Deformation feature and genesis simulation of fold-and-thrust belts in the southern margin,Junggar basin[J]. Geotectonica et Metallogenia, 2009,33(3):386-395.
[11]	张玉兰, 王伟锋, 马宗晋 . 准噶尔盆地南缘构造物理模拟实验[J]. 石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2003,27(3):1-5.
	ZHANG Yulan, WANG Weifeng, MA Zongjin . Physical simulation experiment on geological structures in the south of Juggar basin[J]. Journal of the University of Petroleum,China, 2003,27(3):1-5.
[12]	马德龙, 何登发, 袁剑英 , 等. 准噶尔盆地南缘前陆冲断带深层地质结构及对油气藏的控制作用:以霍尔果斯—玛纳斯—吐谷鲁褶皱冲断带为例[J]. 地学前缘, 2019,26(1):165-177.
	MA Delong, HE Dengfa, YUAN Jianying , et al. The deep structures in the southern Junggar foreland thrust belt and their control on petroleum accumulation:insights from the Huoerguosi-Manasi-Tugulu fold and thrust belt[J]. Earth Science Frontiers, 2019,26(1):165-177.
[13]	于福生, 李定华, 赵进雍 , 等. 双层滑脱构造的物理模拟:对准噶尔盆地南缘褶皱冲断带的启示[J]. 地球科学与环境学报, 2012,34(2):15-23.
	YU Fusheng, LI Dinghua, ZHAO Jinyong , et al. Physical simulation of double decollements:insights into the fold-and-thrust belt in the southern front of Junggar basin[J]. Journal of Earch Sciences and Environment, 2012,34(2):15-23.
[14]	周建勋, 周建生 . 渤海湾盆地新生代构造变形机制:物理模拟和讨论[J]. 中国科学D辑:地球科学, 2006,36(6):507-519.
	ZHOU Jianxun, ZHOU Jiansheng . Mechanism of Cenozoic structural deformation in Bohai Bay basin:physical simulation and discussion[J]. Science in China Series D:Earth Sciences, 2006,36(6):507-519.
[15]	能源, 李勇, 徐丽丽 , 等. 克拉苏构造带盐下超深层断背斜裂缝带发育模式及预测方法[J]. 大地构造与成矿学, 2017,41(1):61-68.
	NENG Yuan, LI Yong, XU Lili , et al. Patterns of fracture zone in the deep subsalt layer of Kelasu structural belt and prospecting method[J]. Geotectonica et Metallogenia, 2017,41(1):61-68.
[16]	BURCHFIEL B C, BROWN E T, QIDONG D , et al. Crustal shortening on the margins of the Tien Shan,Xinjiang,China[J]. International Geology Review, 1999,41(8):665-700.
[17]	SCHARER K M, BURBANK D W, CHEN J , et al. Detachment folding in the southwestern Tian Shan-Tarim foreland,China:shortening estimates and rates[J]. Journal of Structural Geology, 2004,26(11):2 119-2 137.
[18]	郭召杰, 张志诚, 吴朝东 , 等. 中、新生代天山隆升过程及其与准噶尔、阿尔泰山比较研究[J]. 地质学报, 2006,80(1):1-15.
	GUO Zhaojie, ZHANG Zhicheng, WU Chaodong , et al. The Mesozoic and Cenozoic exhumation history of Tianshan and comparative studies to the Junggar and Altai mountains[J]. Acta Geologica Sinica, 2006,80(1):1-15.
[19]	马德龙, 潘建国, 张虎权 , 等. 准噶尔盆地南缘小渠子背斜T/P同构造不整合几何学、运动学特征及地质意义[J]. 地质科学, 2018,53(1):146-154.
	MA Delong, PAN Jianguo, ZHANG Huquan , et al. The geometry and kinematic characteristics of T/P syn-tectonic unconformities at Xiaoquzi anticline and its geological significance to tectonic evolution at the south margin of Junggar basin[J]. Chinese Journal of Geology, 2018,53(1):146-154.
[20]	陈涛, 魏东涛, 杨海波 , 等. 准南前陆冲断带构造特征及其对油气成藏的影响[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2006,17(5):711-718.
	CHEN Tao, WEI Dongtao, YANG Haibo , et al. The tectonic characteristics on the foreland thrust belt and its influence on reservoiring of oil and natural gas in southern Junggar basin[J]. Natural Gas Geoscience, 2006,17(5):711-718.
[21]	卓勤功, 赵孟军, 邹开真 , 等. 中国中西部前陆冲断带油气分布规律及勘探领域[J]. 新疆石油地质, 2018,39(2):125-133.
	ZHUO Qingong, ZHAO Mengjun, ZOU Kaizhen , et al. Petroleum distribution in foreland thrust belts and its exploration areas in midwest China[J]. Xinjiang Petroleum Geology, 2018,39(2):125-133.

准噶尔盆地南缘呼图壁背斜变形机理物理模拟实验

Deformation Mechanism of Hutubi Anticline in the Southern Margin of Junggar Basin: Insights From Physical Simulation Experiment

RichHTML

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 7

参考文献 21

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	阿力甫江·热合木吐力, 潘龙, 李献民, 林娟, 马晶晶, 窦强峰. 基于双平方根算子的速度建模方法及应用[J]. 新疆石油地质, 2023, 44(1): 119-124.
[2]	况昊, 周润驰, 王钧民, 刘豪, 谭先锋, 蔡鑫勇, 肖振兴. 玛湖凹陷与沙湾凹陷上乌尔禾组储集层差异及成因[J]. 新疆石油地质, 2023, 44(1): 18-24.
[3]	代兰, 邬光辉, 陈鑫, 朱永峰, 陈思锜, 罗鑫, 胡明. 共轭走滑断裂形成演化的控制因素及物理模拟实验[J]. 新疆石油地质, 2023, 44(1): 43-50.
[4]	邱浩, 文敏, 吴怡, 幸雪松, 马楠, 李占东, 郭天姿. 南海油田惠州潜山裂缝性凝析油气藏控水实验[J]. 新疆石油地质, 2023, 44(1): 84-92.
[5]	何海清, 唐勇, 邹志文, 郭华军, 徐洋, 李亚哲. 准噶尔盆地中央坳陷西部风城组岩相古地理及油气勘探[J]. 新疆石油地质, 2022, 43(6): 640-653.
[6]	唐勇, 雷德文, 曹剑, 刘寅, 黄立良, 李卉. 准噶尔盆地二叠系全油气系统与源内天然气勘探新领域[J]. 新疆石油地质, 2022, 43(6): 654-662.
[7]	何文军, 宋永, 汤诗棋, 尤新才, 白雨, 赵毅. 玛湖凹陷二叠系风城组全油气系统成藏机理[J]. 新疆石油地质, 2022, 43(6): 663-673.
[8]	龚德瑜, 刘海磊, 杨海波, 李宗浩, 王瑞菊, 吴卫安. 准噶尔盆地风城组烃源岩生气潜力与天然气勘探领域[J]. 新疆石油地质, 2022, 43(6): 674-683.
[9]	蒋文龙, 阿布力米提·依明, 卞保力, 王韬, 任海姣, 韩杨. 准噶尔盆地西北缘风城组烃源岩热演化生物标志化合物变化及意义[J]. 新疆石油地质, 2022, 43(6): 684-692.
[10]	钱门辉, 王绪龙, 黎茂稳, 李志明, 冷筠莹, 孙中良. 玛页1井风城组页岩含油性与烃类赋存状态[J]. 新疆石油地质, 2022, 43(6): 693-703.
[11]	单祥, 窦洋, 晏奇, 陈希光, 彭博, 易俊峰. 玛南斜坡区风城组致密油藏储集层特征及控制因素[J]. 新疆石油地质, 2022, 43(6): 704-713.
[12]	雷海艳, 齐婧, 周妮, 陈俊, 孟颖, 张锡新, 陈锐兵. 玛湖凹陷玛页1井风城组富硅页岩成因及其油气意义[J]. 新疆石油地质, 2022, 43(6): 724-732.
[13]	刘财广, 季瑞雪, 王伟, 张融. 玛湖凹陷风城组页岩油产量影响因素及甜点评价[J]. 新疆石油地质, 2022, 43(6): 733-742.
[14]	吕焕泽, 邹妞妞, 蔡宁宁, 黄永志, 宁诗坦, 朱彪. 玛湖凹陷北斜坡百口泉组碳酸盐胶结物形成机理及其地质意义[J]. 新疆石油地质, 2022, 43(5): 554-562.
[15]	王亚如, 张昌民, 冀冬升, 朱锐, 付文俊, 王泽宇, 刘家乐. 齐古断褶带头屯河组—清水河组地球化学特征及古环境[J]. 新疆石油地质, 2022, 43(5): 563-571.