风城油田超稠油油藏非均质储集层地应力场特征

doi:10.7657/XJPG20200213

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

风城油田浅层超稠油油藏非均质储集层具有埋藏浅、非均质性强、隔夹层发育等特点,阻碍SAGD蒸汽腔的发育,需要利用水力压裂建立渗流通道。为指导储集层压裂,分析了非均质储集层沉积特征、地应力场分布,以及隔夹层对地应力场的影响,结合岩石力学室内实验、测井资料解释和地应力测试结果,建立埋藏深度为282~332 m储集层三维应力场模型。模拟结果与小型压裂测试比较显示,建立的三维应力场模型贴合实际地层侧向压力系数和最大水平主应力与垂向主应力的比值,能较好地反映储集层岩性交界面和应力特征。超稠油储集层以垂向主应力为主,利于引导垂向裂缝;岩性交界面地应力突变,储集层砂岩最小水平主应力小于泥岩隔夹层最小水平主应力。泥岩隔夹层具有较高的破裂压力、杨氏模量和最小水平主应力,裂缝扩展能力弱于油砂段。压裂设计应选择隔夹层内或下方射孔,控制缝高,避免砂堵,以达到较好改善渗流能力的目的。

关键词: 风城油田, 超稠油油藏, 非均质储集层, 三维模型, 泥岩隔夹层, 主应力分布, 破裂压力

Abstract:

The heterogeneous ultra-heavy oil reservoir in the Fengcheng oilfield is characterized by shallow-burial, strong heterogeneity and developed interlayers, which are the main obstacles for the steam chamber development during SAGD. In order to form flowing channels by hydraulic fracturing, the paper analyzes sedimentary characteristics, in-situ stress field distribution and the influences of interlayers on in-situ stress field and establishes a 3D stress field model for the reservoir with the burial depth of 282~332 m based on the results of rock mechanics experiment, logging data interpretation and stress test. The comparison of the simulation results with mini-fracturing test shows that the established 3D stress field model accords with the actual lateral formation pressure coefficient and the ratio of the max. horizontal principal stress to vertical principal stress, which can better reflect the features of lithology interfaces and stresses in the reservoir. The ultra-heavy oil reservoir is dominated by vertical principal stress which is in favor of guiding vertical fractures. The sudden stress changes at lithology interfaces result in the min. horizontal principle stress of sandstone being lower than that of mudstone interlayer. The mudstone interlayer has relatively high breakdown pressure, Young modulus and min. horizontal principle stress, and the fracture propagation capacity of the mudstone interlayer is lower than that of oil sand interval. The positions within interlayers or below interlayers should be selected for perforation during fracturing design, by which fracture height can be controlled, sand plugging can be avoided and reservoir seepage can be improved.

Key words: Fengcheng oilfield, ultra-heavy oil reservoir, heterogeneous reservoir, 3D model, mudstone interlayer, principal stress distribution, fracture pressure

中图分类号:

TE112.23

吴寒, 林伯韬, 潘竟军, 陈森. 风城油田超稠油油藏非均质储集层地应力场特征[J]. 新疆石油地质, 2020, 41(2): 217-222.

WU Han, LIN Botao, PAN Jingjun, CHEN Sen. Characteristics of In-Situ Stress Field in Heterogeneous Ultra-Heavy Oil Reservoir of Fengcheng Oilfield[J]. Xinjiang Petroleum Geology, 2020, 41(2): 217-222.

图/表 15

表1

图1

图2

图3

图4

表2

图5

表3

图6

图7

表4

表5

表6

图8

表7

参考文献 20

[1]	陈森, 窦升军, 游红娟 , 等. 新疆风城油田SAGD蒸汽腔非标准发育治理技术研究[J]. 油气地球物理, 2013,11(4):70-72.
	CHEN Sen, DOU Shengjun, YOU Hongjuan , et al. Research of the SAGD steam chamber non-standardization growth repair technology in Fengcheng oilfield in Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region[J]. Petroleum Geophysics, 2013,11(4):70-72.
[2]	高彦芳, 陈勉, 林伯韬 , 等. SAGD井挤液扩容水力波及范围模型[J]. 新疆石油地质, 2018,39(2):202-208.
	GAO Yanfang, CHEN Mian, LIN Botao , et al. An analytical model for water swept area in SAGD wells[J]. Xinjiang Petroleum Geology, 2018,39(2):202-208.
[3]	AITMATOV I T, VDOVIN K D, KOJOGULOV K C , et al. State of stress in rock and rock-burst proneness in seismic active folded areas[J]. Federation Proceedings, 1987,6(1):344.
[4]	景锋, 盛谦, 张勇慧 , 等. 不同地质成因岩石地应力分布规律的统计分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2008,29(7):1 877-1 883.
	JING Feng, SHENG Qian, ZHANG Yonghui , et al. Statistical analysis of geostress distribution laws for different rocks[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2008,29(7):1 877-1 883.
[5]	MITSAKAKI C, SAKELLARIOU M G, TSINAS D . A study of the crust stress field for the Aegean region(Greece)[J]. Tectonophysics, 2013,597(4):50-72.
[6]	杨红, 许亮, 何衡 , 等. 利用测井、压裂资料求取储层地应力的方法[J]. 断块油气田, 2014,21(4):509-512.
	YANG Hong, XU Liang, HE Heng , et al. Method for obtaining ground stress of reservoir using logging and fracturing data[J]. Fault-Block Oil & Gas Field, 2014,21(4):509-512.
[7]	ZOBACK M D, BARTON C A, BRUDY M , et al. Determination of stress orientation and magnitude in deep wells[J]. International Journal of Rock Mechanics & Mining Sciences, 2003,40(7-8):1 049-1 076.
[8]	ZOBACK M D. Reservoir geomechanics[M]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007: 206-265.
[9]	王金安, 李飞 . 复杂地应力场反演优化算法及研究新进展[J]. 中国矿业大学学报, 2015,44(2):189-205.
	WANG Jin’an, LI Fei . Review of inverse optimal algorithm of in-situ stress filed and new achievement[J]. Journal of China University of Mining & Technology, 2015,44(2):189-205.
[10]	LIN B, JIN Y, PANG H , et al. Experimental investigation on dilation mechanisms of land-facies Karamay oil sand reservoirs under water injection[J]. Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering, 2016,49:1 425-1 439.
[11]	孙新革, 程中疆, 李海燕 , 等. 风城油田重32井区SAGD试验区储层构型研究[J]. 石油天然气学报, 2014,36(3):15-18.
	SUN Xinge, CHENG Zhongjiang, LI Haiyan , et al. Reservoir architecture in SAGD area of wellblock Zhong 32 of Fengcheng oilfield[J]. Journal of Oil and Gas Technology, 2014,36(3):15-18.
[12]	林伯韬, 刘星, 陈森 , 等. 新疆风城油田重18井区稠油储集层非均质性定量评价[J]. 新疆石油地质, 2017,38(5):575-579.
	LIN Botao, LIU Xing, CHEN Sen , et al. Quantitative heterogeneity evaluation of heavy oil reservoirs in wellblock Zhong-18 of Feng-cheng oilfield,Xinjiang[J]. Xinjiang Petroleum Geology, 2017,38(5):575-579.
[13]	马建海, 孙建孟 . 用测井资料计算地层应力[J]. 测井技术, 2002,26(4):347-352.
	MA Jianhai, SUN Jianmeng . Calculation of formation stress using logging data[J]. Well Logging Technology, 2002,26(4):347-352.
[14]	RAAENAM, BRUDY M . Pump-in/flowback tests reduce the estimate of horizontal in-situ stress significantly[R]. SPE-71637-MS, 2001.
[15]	RAAEN A M, SKOMEDAL E, KJØRHOLT H , et al. Stress determination from hydraulic fracturing tests:the system stiffness approach[J]. International Journal of Rock Mechanics & Mining Sciences, 2001,38(4):529-541.
[16]	李海燕, 高阳, 王延杰 , 等. 辫状河储集层夹层发育模式及其对开发的影响:以准噶尔盆地风城油田为例[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2015,42(3):364-373.
	LI Haiyan, GAO Yang, WANG Yanjie , et al. Intercalation pattern and its impact on development of braided river reservoirs:a case of Fengcheng oilfield,Junggar basin,NW China[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2015,42(3):364-373.
[17]	DRUCKER D C, PRAGER W . Soil mechanics and plastic analysis or limit design[J]. Quarterly of Applied Mathematics, 1952,10(2):157-165.
[18]	余琪祥, 宫瑞, 余风华 , 等. 准噶尔盆地乌伦古坳陷WC1井高电阻率泥岩成因分析[J]. 录井工程, 2015,26(3):88-93.
	YU Qixiang, GONG Rui, YU Fenghua , et al. Causes analysis for well WC 1 high-resistivity mudstone in Wulungu depression,Junggar basin[J]. Mud Logging Engineering, 2015,26(3):88-93.
[19]	HAIMSON B, FAIRHURST C . Initiation and extension of hydraulic fractures in rocks[R]. SPE 1710-PA, 1967.
[20]	李传亮, 孔祥言 . 油井压裂过程中岩石破裂压力计算公式的理论研究[J]. 石油钻采工艺, 2000,22(2):54-56
	. LI Chuanliang, KONG Xiangyan . A theoretical study on rock breakdown pressure calculation equations of fracturing process[J]. Oil Drilling & Production Technology, 2000,22(2):54-56.