低压特低渗透油藏采油、采液指数变化规律

新疆石油地质 ›› 2010, Vol. 31 ›› Issue (5): 521-522.

低压特低渗透油藏采油、采液指数变化规律

王厉强^a, 孙玉凯^b, 刘曰强^b, 崔英怀^b, 罗阳俊^b, 杨丹^b

中国石油吐哈油田分公司 a.博士后工作站; b.勘探开发研究院,新疆哈密 839009

收稿日期:2010-03-18 修回日期:2010-05-12 发布日期:2020-10-21
作者简介:王厉强(1974-),男,山东临沂人,工程师,博士,油气田开发,(Tel)0902-2772244(E-mail)yjywlq@petrochina.com.cn.

Variation of Oil or Liquid Productivity Index in Low-Pressure and Super-Low Permeability Reservoir

WANG Li-qiang^a, SUN Yu-kai^b, LIU Yue-qiang^b, CUI Ying-huai^b, LUO Yang-jun^b, YANG Dan^b

Tuha Oilfield Company, a. Post-Doctoral Station, b. Research Institute of Exploration and Development, PetroChina, Hami, Xinjiang 839009, China

Received:2010-03-18 Revised:2010-05-12 Published:2020-10-21

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 针对低压特低渗透油藏较常规低渗透油藏储集层岩石压力敏感性更强的特点,推导了考虑启动压力和渗透率压力敏感性变化下的无因次采油(液)指数计算公式。以吐哈油田牛圈湖低压特低渗油藏为例,讨论了油水粘度比、启动压力和渗透率变形系数动态变化时无因次采油、采液指数与含水率的变化关系。研究结果表明,低压特低渗油藏启动压力的动态变化对无因次采油指数有较明显的影响;此外,无因次采液指数受启动压力和渗透率变形系数的影响也较常规低渗透油藏更为明显。

关键词: 低压, 低渗透油气藏, 启动压力, 压力梯度, 无因次采油指数, 无因次采液指数

Abstract: Low pressure and super-low permeability reservoir is of more rock pressure sensitivity than conventional permeability reservoir. In this paper, the formula for calculation of non-dimensional oil or liquid productivity index by considering changes of starting-up pressure and permeability pressure sensitivity is deduced. Taking Niujuanhu reservoir with low pressure and super-low permeability in Tuha oil field as an example, the variation between non-dimensional oil or liquid productivity index and water cut is discussed when oil-water viscosity ratio, starting-up pressure and permeability deformation factor are changed dynamically. The studied result shows that the dynamic change of starting-up pressure of such a reservoir has obvious effect on the non-dimensional oil or liquid productivity index. Moreover, this index is much more affected by the starting-up pressure and permeability deformation factor than that of conventional low permeability reservoir.

Key words: low pressure, starting-up, pressure gradient, non-dimensional oil productivity index, non-dimensional liquid productivity index

中图分类号:

TE331
TE348

王厉强, 孙玉凯, 刘曰强, 崔英怀, 罗阳俊, 杨丹. 低压特低渗透油藏采油、采液指数变化规律[J]. 新疆石油地质, 2010, 31(5): 521-522.

WANG Li-qiang, SUN Yu-kai, LIU Yue-qiang, CUI Ying-huai, LUO Yang-jun, YANG Dan. Variation of Oil or Liquid Productivity Index in Low-Pressure and Super-Low Permeability Reservoir[J]. Xinjiang Petroleum Geology, 2010, 31(5): 521-522.

[1]	陈占军, 任战利. 致密砂岩气藏单井动用地质储量和技术可采储量计算方法——以鄂尔多斯盆地延长气田石炭系—二叠系气藏为例[J]. 新疆石油地质, 2022, 43(3): 360-367.
[2]	孟蕾. 莫西庄油田三工河组二段砂岩储集层物性下限[J]. 新疆石油地质, 2020, 41(5): 557-564.
[3]	黄雨1，李晓平1，谭晓华1，张芨强2，杨国超3. 考虑启动压力梯度的复合气藏不稳定压力动态分析[J]. , 2019, 40(2): 1-1.
[4]	孙盼科1，徐怀民1，郑小敏2. 水锁启动压力梯度与应力敏感性对致密气藏产能的影响——以长庆油田苏里格气田XX4气井为例[J]. , 2015, 36(5): 1-1.
[5]	张栋，吴文祥. 不同黏弹性聚合物溶液交替注入提高采收率机理[J]. , 2015, 36(4): 1-1.
[6]	胡书勇1，李勇凯1，马超1,2，尹昭云3，陈力4. 低渗、特低渗油藏极限井距计算新方法[J]. , 2015, 36(4): 1-1.
[7]	高文君a，李宁a，侯程程a，张宁县b. 2种无因次采液指数与含水率关系式的建立及优选[J]. , 2015, 36(1): 1-1.
[8]	魏漪，宋新民，冉启全，童敏. 致密油藏压裂水平井非稳态产能预测模型[J]. , 2014, 35(1): 1-1.
[9]	李传亮. 油藏工程中的若干问题 ——再与窦宏恩先生商榷[J]. , 2013, 34(4): 1-1.
[10]	窦宏恩. 油田开发中岩石压缩系数和孔隙度相关问题探讨[J]. , 2012, 33(5): 1-1.
[11]	张晓亮, 张金庆. 裂缝性低渗透油藏弹性采收率计算新方法[J]. 新疆石油地质, 2011, 32(4): 409-411.
[12]	梁成钢, 刘卫东, 石彦, 王国先, 谢建勇, 蔡军, 王慧清. 低渗透油气藏近破裂压力注水的可行性——以北三台油田北十六油藏为例[J]. 新疆石油地质, 2011, 32(2): 153-155.
[13]	陈光梅, 车雄伟. 弹性驱低渗透油气藏的分区物质平衡方法[J]. 新疆石油地质, 2011, 32(2): 157-159.
[14]	谢全, 何顺利, 焦春艳, 朱华银, 吕志凯. 超低渗单相渗流不存在启动压力梯度的实验[J]. 新疆石油地质, 2011, 32(2): 173-175.
[15]	张作阳. 周期注水技术在辽河滩海油田的应用[J]. 新疆石油地质, 2011, 32(2): 179-180.