莫西庄油田三工河组二段砂岩储集层物性下限

doi:10.7657/XJPG20200507

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

莫西庄油田三工河组二段储集层总体呈现低孔低渗、非均质性强的特点,基于岩心常规分析、压汞、试油等资料,对比常用的有效储集层物性下限确定方法在研究区的应用效果,确定了三工河组二段储集层物性下限,并对影响储集层物性下限的主要因素进行了分析。研究结果表明,莫西庄油田三工河组二段储集层岩性主要为三角洲前缘沉积的细—中砂岩,储集空间类型以原生粒间孔为主,储集层物性下限求取方法中启动压力梯度法、分布函数曲线法和含油产状法在研究区更具适用性,综合确定孔隙度下限为10.1%,渗透率下限为1.15 mD;沉积相和成岩作用是影响研究区储集层物性下限的主控因素,水下分流河道微相强溶蚀弱压实弱胶结型储集层的物性下限最低,此外,原油性质、埋藏深度等是影响储集层物性下限的次要因素。

关键词: 莫西庄油田, 三工河组, 低孔低渗储集层, 有效储集层, 启动压力梯度法, 分布函数曲线法, 含油产状法, 储集层物性下限

Abstract:

The second member of Sangonghe formation in Moxizhuang oilfield presents the characteristics of low porosity, low permeability and strong heterogeneity. Based on the data of conventional core analysis, mercury injection and formation test, the paper compares the application effects of commonly-used methods to determine the lower limits of physical properties of effective reservoirs in the study area, determines the lower limits of reservoir physical properties in the second member of Sangonghe formation, and analyzes the main factors influencing the lower limits of reservoir physical properties. The results show that the second member of Sangonghe formation in Moxizhuang oilfield is mainly composed of medium-fine sandstone deposited in delta front, the reservoir space of the formation is dominated by primary intergranular pores, and the methods of starting pressure gradient, the distribution function curve and oil-bearing occurrence are very practical for determining the lower limits of reservoir physical properties in the study area, and the lower limits of reservoir porosity and permeability are determined as 10.1% and 1.15 mD, respectively. Sedimentary facies and diagenesis are the main factors affecting the lower limits of reservoir physical properties. Strong dissolution, weak compaction and weak cementation reservoirs of underwater distributary channel microfacies have the lowest limits of physical properties. In addition, crude oil properties and reservoir burial depth are the minor factors affecting the lower limits of reservoir physical properties.

Key words: Moxizhuang oilfield, Sangonghe formation, low porosity and low permeability, effective reservoir, starting pressure gradient method, distribution function curve method, oil-bearing occurrence method, lower limit of reservoir physical property

中图分类号:

TE112.23

孟蕾. 莫西庄油田三工河组二段砂岩储集层物性下限[J]. 新疆石油地质, 2020, 41(5): 557-564.

MENG Lei. Lower Limits of Physical Properties of Sandstone Reservoirs in the Second Member of Sangonghe Formation in Moxizhuang Oilfield[J]. Xinjiang Petroleum Geology, 2020, 41(5): 557-564.

图/表 11

图1

表1

图2

图3

图4

图5

图6

图7

图8

表2

表3

参考文献 25

[1]	曹雪娇. 莫西庄地区三工河组二段油藏储层特征研究[D]. 石家庄:河北地质大学, 2016.
	CAO Xuejiao. Reservoirs features of the second member of Sangonghe formation in Moxizhuang area[D]. Shijiazhuang:Hebei GEO University, 2016.
[2]	刘传鹏. 准噶尔盆地莫西庄地区三工河组二段储层微观特征及有效储层控制因素[J]. 中国地质, 2013,40(5):1 515-1 522
	. LIU Chuanpeng. Reservoir microscopic characteristics and effective reservoir control factors of J₁s₂ in Moxizhuang area,Junggar basin[J]. Geology in China, 2013,40(5):1 515-1 522.
[3]	王孝明. 准中1区侏罗系三工河组低渗透储层特征与有效性评价[D]. 山东青岛:中国石油大学(华东), 2015.
	WANG Xiaoming. Reservoir characteristics and efficiency evaluation of the low permeability reservoirs of Sangonghe formation of Jurassic in the Block 1 of the central part in Junggar basin[D]. Qingdao,Shandong:China University of Petroleum(East China), 2015.
[4]	邓旭波. 准噶尔盆地中部1区块J₁s₂储层发育特征及油藏类型[J]. 石油地质与工程, 2016,30(4):54-57.
	DENG Xubo. Development characteristics and reservoir types of J₁s₂ reservoir in Block 1,central Junggar basin[J]. Petroleum Geology and Engineering, 2016,30(4):54-57.
[5]	乔玉雷, 隋风贵, 林会喜, 等. 准噶尔盆地中部车莫古隆起对油气的控制作用[J]. 石油天然气学报, 2013,35(12):56-61.
	QIAO Yulei, SUI Fenggui, LIN Huixi, et al. The control of Chemo palaeohigh on oil and gas in central Junggar basin[J]. Journal of Oil and Gas Technology, 2013,35(12):56-61.
[6]	毕研斌, 高山林, 朱允辉, 等. 准噶尔盆地莫西庄油田成藏模式[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2011,32(3):318-326. doi: 10.11743/ogg20110302
	BI Yanbin, GAO Shanlin, ZHU Yunhui, et al. Hydrocarbon accumulation patterns of Moxizhuang oilfield,the Junggar basin[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2011,32(3):318-326.
[7]	管永国, 李艳英, 吴春文, 等. 莫西庄油田三工河组砂体精细对比与油气富集规律[J]. 测井技术, 2013,37(5):562-566.
	GUAN Yongguo, LI Yanying, WU Chunwen, et al. The precise comparison and the hydrocarbon accumulation regularity of Sangonghe group Moxizhuang oilfield[J]. Well Logging Technology, 2013,37(5):562-566.
[8]	王延章, 林承焰, 董春梅, 等. 夹层及物性遮挡带的成因及其对油藏的控制作用:以准噶尔盆地莫西庄地区三工河组为例[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2006,33(3):319-321.
	WANG Yanzhang, LIN Chengyan, DONG Chunmei, et al. Origins of interlayer and permeability barrier and their controlling function on reservoir:with Sangonghe formation of Moxizhuang in Junggar basin as an example[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2006,33(3):319-321.
[9]	操应长. 东营凹陷西部沙四上亚段滩坝砂体有效储层的物性下限及控制因素[J]. 沉积学报, 2009,27(2):230-237.
	CAO Yingchang. The petrophysical parameter cutoff and controlling factors of the effective reservoir of beach and bar sandbodies of the upper part of the fourth member of the Shahejie formation in west part of Dongying depression[J]. Acta Sedimentologica Sinica, 2009,27(2):230-237.
[10]	吴康军, 刘洛夫, 徐正建, 等. 鄂尔多斯盆地长7段致密油成藏物性下限研究[J]. 石油实验地质, 2016,38(1):63-69. doi: 10.11781/sysydz201601063
	WU Kangjun, LIU Luofu, XU Zhengjian, et al. Lower limits of pore throat radius,porosity and permeability for tight oil accumulations in the Chang 7 member,Ordos basin[J]. Petroleum Geology & Experiment, 2016,38(1):63-69.
[11]	张凤奇, 钟红利, 魏登峰, 等. 鄂尔多斯盆地陕北斜坡东南部长7段致密砂岩油藏成藏物性下限[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2017,28(2):232-240.
	ZHANG Fengqi, ZHONG Hongli, WEI Dengfeng, et al. Lower limits of porosity and permeability for tight oil accumulations in the Chang 7 member,southeastern Shanbei slope,Ordos basin[J]. Natural Gas Geoscience, 2017,28(2):232-240.
[12]	崔玉峰, 王贵文, 孙艳慧, 等. 低孔低渗储层物性下限确定方法及其适用性[J]. 西南石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2016,38(6):35-48.
	CUI Yufeng, WANG Guiwen, SUN Yanhui, et al. Methods of cutoff determination and applicability analysis in low porosity and low permeability reservoir[J]. Journal of Southwest Petroleum University (Naturnal Science Edition), 2016,38(6):35-48.
[13]	路智勇, 韩学辉, 张欣, 等. 储层物性下限确定方法的研究现状与展望[J]. 中国石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2016,40(5):32-42.
	LU Zhiyong, HAN Xuehui, ZHANG Xin, et al. Research status and outlook for methods of determining petrophysical property cutoffs[J]. Journal of China University of Petroleum (Edition of Natural Science), 2016,40(5):32-42.
[14]	张耀文, 陈强, 董俊昌, 等. 中东地区 Z 油田物性下限值的确定[J]. 国外测井技术, 2014,35(6):30-33.
	ZHANG Yaowen, CHEN Qiang, DONG Junchang, et al. Determination of the physical property lower limits of Z oilfield in the Middle East area[J]. World Well Logging Technology, 2014,35(6):30-33.
[15]	焦翠华, 夏冬冬, 王军, 等. 特低渗砂岩储层物性下限确定方法:以永进油田西山窑组储集层为例[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2009,30(3):379-383. doi: 10.11743/ogg20090319
	JIAO Cuihua, XIA Dongdong, WANG Jun, et al. Methods for determining the petrophysical property cutoffs of extra-low porosity and permeability sandstone reservoirs:an example from the Xishanyao formation reservoirs in Yongjin oilfield[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2009,30(3):379-383.
[16]	张宝收, 鲁雪松, 孙雄伟, 等. 塔里木盆地迪北致密砂岩气藏储层物性下限研究[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2015,27(1):81-88.
	ZHANG Baoshou, LU Xuesong, SUN Xiongwei, et al. Study on the lower limit of physical properties of tight sandstone gas reservoirs in Dibei area,Tarim basin[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2015,27(1):81-88.
[17]	张程恩, 潘保芝, 刘倩茹. 储层品质因子RQI结合聚类算法进行储层分类评价研究[J]. 国外测井技术, 2012,33(4):11-13.
	ZHANG Cheng’en, PAN Baozhi, LIU Qianru. Reservoir classification evaluation research with combination of reservoir quality factor RQI and cluster in galgorithm[J]. World Well Logging Technology, 2012 , 33(4):11-13.
[18]	李中锋, 何顺利. 低渗透储层原油边界层对渗流规律的影响[J]. 大庆石油地质与开发, 2005,24(2):57-59.
	LI Zhongfeng, HE Shunli. Influence of boundary layers upon filtration law in low permeability oil reservoirs[J]. Petroleum Geology & Oilfield Development in Daqing, 2005,24(2):57-59.
[19]	万玲, 孙岩, 魏国齐. 确定储集层物性参数下限的一种新方法及其应用:以鄂尔多斯盆地中部气田为例[J]. 沉积学报, 1999,17(3):454-457.
	WAN Ling, SUN Yan, WEI Guoqi. A new method used to determine the lower limit of the petrophysical parameters for reservoir and its application:a case study on Zhongbu gas field in Ordos basin[J]. Acta Sedimentologica Sinica, 1999,17(3):454-457.
[20]	王艳忠, 操应长, 宋国奇, 等. 东营凹陷古近系深部碎屑岩有效储层物性下限的确定[J]. 中国石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2009,33(4):16-21.
	WANG Yanzhong, CAO Yingchang, SONG Guoqi, et al. Determination of physical property lower limit of deep clastic effective reservoirs of Paleogene in Dongying depression[J]. Journal of China University of Petroleum(Edition of Natural Science), 2009,33(4):16-21.
[21]	郭华军, 单祥, 李亚哲, 等. 玛湖凹陷北斜坡百口泉组储集层物性下限及控制因素[J]. 新疆石油地质, 2018,39(1):63-69.
	GUO Huajun, SHAN Xiang, LI Yazhe, et al. Lower limits of reservoir physical properties and controlling factors of Baikouquan formation on the northern slope of Mahu sag[J]. Xinjiang Petroleum Geology, 2018,39(1):63-69.
[22]	王建东, 王昌, 曹海防, 等. 准噶尔盆地中部4区块致密砂岩有效储集层物性下限[J]. 新疆石油地质, 2018,39(5):609-613.
	WANG Jiandong, WANG Chang, CAO Haifang, et al. Lower limits of physical properties of Jurassic tight sandstone reservoirs in Block 4 of central Junggar basin[J]. Xinjiang Petroleum Geology, 2018,39(5):609-613.
[23]	郭睿. 储集层物性下限值确定方法及其补充[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2004,31(5):140-144.
	GUO Rui. Supplement to determining method of cutoff value of net pay[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2004,31(5):140-144.
[24]	王艳忠. 车镇凹陷古近系深层碎屑岩有效储层物性下限及控制因素[J]. 沉积学报, 2010,28(4):752-761.
	WANG Yanzhong. Lower property limit and controls on deep effective clastic reservoirs of Paleogene in Chezhen depression[J]. Acta Sedimentologica Sinica, 2010,28(4):752-761.
[25]	毕海滨, 王颖惠, 鲁国明. 油水界面张力的经验统计法[J]. 新疆石油地质, 1996,17(2):173-176.
	BI Haibin, WANG Yinghui, LU Guoming. Empirical statistic method of oil-water interfacial tension[J]. Xinjiang Petroleum Geology, 1996,17(2):173-176.

物性下限确定方法	代表性方法	使用资料	前人研究实例	适用性
基于岩心分析的物性下限确定方法	孔渗交会法	孔隙度、渗透率	新疆油田某区块储集层^[12]：孔隙度下限为7.0%,渗透率下限为1.00 mD	应用全区的岩心分析数据,但趋势线类型和拐点的确定受人为因素干扰大
	储集层品质指数法	孔隙度、渗透率	新疆油田某区块储集层^[12]：孔隙度下限为7.0%	应用全区的岩心分析数据,但趋势线类型和拐点的确定受人为因素干扰大
	启动压力梯度法	孔隙度、渗透率、压汞资料		从渗流角度出发,较有说服力
基于测试分析的物性下限确定方法	分布函数曲线法	孔隙度、渗透率、试油结果	东营凹陷西部沙四上亚段滩坝砂储集层（埋深3 400~3 600 m）^[9]：孔隙度下限为11.1%,渗透率下限为1.29 mD	试油结果中干层数量少,无法代表非有效储集层
	正逆累积法	孔隙度、渗透率、试油结果	中东地区Z油田孔隙型碳酸盐岩储集层^[14]：孔隙度下限为6.2%,渗透率下限为0.45 mD	试油结果中干层数量少,无法代表非有效储集层
	试油法	孔隙度、渗透率、试油结果	永进油田西山窑组储集层^[15]：孔隙度下限为6.5%,渗透率下限为0.07 mD	试油资料少,确定的物性下限精度较低
	含油产状法	孔隙度、渗透率、试油结果、岩心含油级别	塔里木盆地迪北气藏阿合组致密砂岩储集层^[16]：孔隙度下限为2.0%,渗透率下限为0.03 mD	试油资料少,但结合了岩心含油产状资料,应用性较好