Field Application of Steam Foam Flooding in Foreign Oilfields

doi:10.7657/XJPG20210117

Abstract

Abstract:

This paper reviews field applications of steam foam flooding in foreign oilfields, analyzes and summarizes the rules based on 18 oilfield cases. Specifically, we investigated how steam temperature, steam dryness, surfactant type, surfactant concentration, and timing and method of injecting surfactants influence the stimulation effect of steam foam flooding. Steam foam has been widely used to improve the sweep efficiency of steam flooding or cyclic steam stimulation, and consequently improving thermal recovery. The technology has been successfully piloted and applied on an industrial scale in many oil fields such as in the United States, Canada, and Venezuela. Finally, according to the field performances, we put forward some proposals for improving steam foam flooding, with the intent to provide referential support to field application of steam foam flooding.

Key words: steam foam flooding, steam huff and puff, steam flooding, enhanced oil recovery, field performances, controlling factor, oilfield case analysis

CLC Number:

TE345

GONG Yuning, WANG Yuhao, ZHU Zhouyuan. Field Application of Steam Foam Flooding in Foreign Oilfields[J]. Xinjiang Petroleum Geology, 2021, 42(1): 120-126.

Figures/Tables 6

Table 1

Fig. 1.

Fig. 2.

Fig. 3.

References 27

[1]	HIRASKI G J . The steam-foam process[J]. Journal of Petroleum Technology, 1989,41(5):449-456.
[2]	钟立国, 王成, 刘建斌 , 等. 中深层稠油油藏蒸汽-氮气复合吞吐技术[J]. 新疆石油地质, 2019,40(2):194-198.
	ZHONG Liguo, WANG Cheng, LIU Jianbin , et al. Nitrogen assisted steam stimulation technology for mid-deep heavy oil reservoirs[J]. Xinjiang Petroleum Geology, 2019,40(2):194-198.
[3]	冯翠菊, 王春生, 张蓉 , 等. 稠油重力泄水辅助蒸汽驱三维物理模拟实验[J]. 新疆石油地质, 2019,40(4):464-467.
	FENG Cuiju, WANG Chunsheng, ZHANG Rong , et al. Gravity water-drainage assisted steam flooding of heavy oil:3D physical modeling experiment[J]. Xinjiang Petroleum Geology, 2019,40(4):464-467.
[4]	ADKINS J D . Field results of adding surfactant to cyclic steam wells[R]. SPE 12007, 1983.
[5]	SANDER P R, CLARK G J, LAU E C . Steam-foam diversion process developed to overcome steam override in Athabasca[R]. SPE 22630, 1991.
[6]	PLOEG J F, DUERKSEN J H . Two successful steam/foam field tests,Sections 15A and 26C,Midway-Sunset field[R]. SPE 13609, 1985.
[7]	FRIEDMANN F, SMITH M E, GUICE W R , et al. Steam-foam mechanistic field trial in the Midway-Sunset field[J]. SPE Reservoir Engineering, 1994,9(4):297-304. doi: 10.2118/21780-PA
[8]	PATZEK T W, KOINIS M T . Kern River steam-foam pilots[J]. Journal of Petroleum Technology, 1990,42(4):496-503. doi: 10.2118/17380-PA
[9]	PATZEK T W, MYHILL N A . Simulation of the Bishop steam foam pilot[R]. SPE 18786, 1989.
[10]	ESON R L . Improvement in sweep efficiencies in thermal oil-recovery projects through the application of in-situ foams[R]. SPE 11806, 1983.
[11]	MOHAMMADI S S, MCCOLLUM T J . Steam-foam pilot project in Guadalupe field,California[R]. SPE 15054, 1989.
[12]	BAUTISTA L S, WANINGER E A . The effect of steam/foam injection in a steamflood experiencing downdip steam migration[R]. SPE 25783, 1993.
[13]	ESON R L, O,NESKY S K. The application of in-situ steam foams to improve recovery in mature steam drives[R]. SPE 11704, 1983.
[14]	DELAMAIDE E, CUENCA A, CHABERT M . State of the art review of the steam foam process[R]. SPE 181160, 2016.
[15]	DJABBARAH N F, WEBER S L, FREEMAN D C , et al. Laboratory design and field demonstration of steam diversion with foam[R]. SPE 20067, 1990.
[16]	MOHAMMADI S S, COOMBE D A, STEVENSON V M . Test of steam-foam process for mobility control in South Casper Creek reservoir[J]. Journal of Canadian Petroleum Technology, 1993,32(10):49-54.
[17]	YANNIMARAS D V, KOBBE R K . Evaluation of steam-surfactant-fuel gas co-current injection into two patterns of a mature steamflood[R]. SPE 17382, 1988.
[18]	KEIJZER P P M, MUIJS H M, JANSSEN-VAN R R, et al. Application of steam foam in the Tia Juana field,Venezuela:laboratory tests and field results[R]. SPE 14905, 1986.
[19]	MENDEZ Z, ALVAREZ J M, ESCOBAR E , et al. Cyclic steam injection with additives:laboratory and field test results of steam/foam and steam/solvent processes[R]. SPE 24632, 1982.
[20]	ROBAINA R M, ZIRITT J L . Evaluation of a surfactant:steam-soak pilot test in the Bolivar Coast,Venezuela[R]. SPE 17386, 1988.
[21]	ELLIOT C S, ALDEA C H, CALARASU D , et al. Field trial results obtained with a foam block during a steam drive experiment in the Romanian Levantine-Moreni reservoir[R]. Stavanger, Norway:6th European Symposium on Improved Oil Recovery, 1991.
[22]	MOHAMMADI S S, VAN SL KE D C, GANONG B L. Steam-foam pilot project in Dome-Tumbador,Midway-Sunset field[R]. SPE 16736, 1989.
[23]	MOHAMMADI S S, TENZER J R . Steam-foam pilot project at Dome-Tumbador,Midway-Sunset field:part 2[R]. SPE 20201, 1990.
[24]	ESON R L, COOKE R W A. Comprehensive analysis of steam foam diverters and application methods[R]. SPE 18785, 1989.
[25]	GAUGLITZ P A, SMITH M E, HOLTZCLAW M I , et al. Optimization of steam/foam for profile control:Midway-Sunset 26C[R]. SPE 25781, 1993.
[26]	PATZEK T W . Field applications of steam foam for mobility improvement and profile control[J]. SPE Reservoir Engineering, 1996,11(2):79-86. doi: 10.2118/29612-PA
[27]	VAN LOOKEREN J . Calculation methods for linear and radial steam flow in oil reservoirs[J]. Society of Petroleum Engineers Journal, 1983,23(3):427-439. doi: 10.2118/6788-PA

油田所在地	油田名称	区块名称	蒸汽泡沫驱年份	油藏埋深/m	原油黏度/ (mPa·s)	原油密度/ (g·cm^-3)	初始开发方式	油藏厚度/m	孔隙度/%	渗透率/ mD
美国加州	Midway-Sunset	15A	1983	335	900	0.979	蒸汽驱	95.00	36.5	3 900
美国加州	Midway-Sunset	26C	1983	365	1 500	0.973	蒸汽驱	79.00	29.0	1 390
美国加州	Midway-Sunset	Dome- Tumbador	1985—1988	490		0.992	蒸汽驱	134.00	34.0	2 150
美国加州	Kern River	Bishop	1982	185		0.979	蒸汽吞吐, 蒸汽驱	16.00	30.0
美国加州	Kern River	Mecca	1980—1985	305		0.979	蒸汽吞吐, 蒸汽驱	22.50	30.0
美国加州	Kern River	McManus 208		133			蒸汽吞吐, 蒸汽驱	30.00	35.0	1 800
美国加州	Guadalupe		1984—1986	850	560	1.007	蒸汽驱	8.50	35.0	1 550
美国加州	Cymric	Section 26W	1991	330	2 000	0.982	蒸汽驱	7.00~23.00	39.0	500~ 2 000
美国加州	Kern Front	Witmer B2-3	1982	477			蒸汽吞吐, 蒸汽驱	18.00	33.0	2 210
美国加州	Kern Front	Witmer B2-5	1982	595			蒸汽吞吐, 蒸汽驱	15.00	33.0	2 210
美国加州	South Belridge		1987	180	1 600	0.980	蒸汽驱	30.00	35.0	1 500~ 3 500
美国加州	Cat Canyon			1 051~1 318		1.014	蒸汽吞吐	107.00~ 152.00	30.0	450
美国怀俄明州	South Casper Creek		1990	790	600	0.975	蒸汽驱
美国怀俄明州	Winkleman Dome Nugget		1983	373	800~1 100	0.973	蒸汽驱	55.00	22.8	481
加拿大阿尔伯塔省	Athabasca	Glisp	1989	180~240	2 000 000		蒸汽驱	47.00	35.0
委内瑞拉	Tia Juana		1984—1985	305	2 000~6 000		蒸汽吞吐	24.00~51.00	38.1
委内瑞拉	Bolivar		1984—1986	300~650	100~10 000		蒸汽吞吐	20.00~ 120.00	30.0~38.0	750
罗马尼亚	Levantine- Moreni	Mio-Pliocen Area	1988		800	0.950	蒸汽驱	38.66	29.0	986