Xinjiang Petroleum Geology ›› 2025, Vol. 46 ›› Issue (4): 470-477.doi: 10.7657/XJPG20250410
• RESERVOIR ENGINEERING • Previous Articles Next Articles
LIU Yaoyu(), HE Yunfeng(
), ZHANG Wenxue, MEI Shengwen, CHI Linxian, WANG Ligang
Received:
2025-02-17
Revised:
2025-03-04
Online:
2025-08-01
Published:
2025-07-25
Contact:
HE Yunfeng
E-mail:liuyy.xbsj@sinopec.com;heyunfeng2316697@163.com
CLC Number:
LIU Yaoyu, HE Yunfeng, ZHANG Wenxue, MEI Shengwen, CHI Linxian, WANG Ligang. Performance Evaluation of Water Injection for Energy Replenishment in Fault-Controlled Fractured-Vuggy Reservoirs in Shunbei No.1 Fault Zone, Tarim Basin[J]. Xinjiang Petroleum Geology, 2025, 46(4): 470-477.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Reference Manager|ProCite|BibTeX|RefWorks
Table 1.
Parameters of water injection wells"
井名及注水轮次 | 日产油 增量/t | 压力增量/ MPa | 累计 产油量/t |
---|---|---|---|
SHB1CX井 | 7.86 | 3.91 | 1 591.13 |
SHB5-4H井第1轮注水 | 20.65 | 57.95 | 3 002.06 |
SHB5-4H井第2轮注水 | 24.53 | 78.24 | 3 305.83 |
SHB5-4H井第3轮注水 | 10.02 | 69.58 | 988.82 |
SHB5-4H井第4轮注水 | 34.58 | 32.43 | 7 097.84 |
SHB5-4H井第5轮注水 | 11.26 | 5.21 | 82.44 |
SHB5-11H井第1轮注水 | 0.27 | 21.11 | 9 946.48 |
SHB5-11H井第2轮注水 | 4.72 | 0.98 | 32.69 |
SHB5-2井第1轮注水 | 23.75 | 68.86 | 8 241.80 |
SHB5-2井第2轮注水 | 46.13 | 54.42 | 5 313.46 |
SHB5-2CH井 | 0.97 | 11.40 | 15 044.82 |
SHB5-8CH井 | 8.46 | 5.02 | 1 398.05 |
SHB5-5H井第1轮注水 | 17.55 | 61.51 | 2 350.16 |
SHB5-5H井第2轮注水 | 26.35 | 35.43 | 1 519.34 |
SHB5-5H井第3轮注水 | 5.40 | 18.47 | 881.79 |
SHB5-5H井第4轮注水 | 6.48 | 31.17 | 1 691.32 |
SHB5-5H井第5轮注水 | 15.62 | 5.26 | 884.65 |
Table 3.
Parameters for waterflooding effectiveness evaluation"
井名及注水轮次 | 焖井 时间/d | 周期累计 注水量/m3 | 周期注采比/ (m3·t-1) | 方水换油率/ (t·m-3) | 单位压力恢复 耗水量/(m3·MPa-1) | 提高日产 油量/t |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SHB1CX井 | 29 | 29 | 0.865 4 | 0.193 5 | 1 045.801 5 | 3.9 |
SHB5-4H井第1轮注水 | 22 | 8 220 | 2.159 8 | 0.454 3 | 319.950 1 | 57.9 |
SHB5-4H井第2轮注水 | 10 | 6 607 | 2.705 4 | 0.365 6 | 368.609 8 | 78.2 |
SHB5-4H井第3轮注水 | 69 | 9 042 | 4.644 9 | 0.164 6 | 599.301 4 | 69.5 |
SHB5-4H井第4轮注水 | 42 | 6 005 | 1.008 7 | 0.493 9 | 415.529 2 | 32.4 |
SHB5-4H井第5轮注水 | 6 | 14 369 | 7.725 9 | 0.008 5 | 864.821 4 | 5.2 |
SHB5-11H井第1轮注水 | 29 | 9 686 | 0.494 1 | 16.773 0 | 1 825.925 9 | 21.1 |
SHB5-11H井第2轮注水 | 21 | 593 | 1.476 1 | 0.006 4 | 1 070.550 8 | 0.9 |
SHB5-2井第1轮注水 | 14 | 5 053 | 0.721 4 | 0.662 9 | 523.452 6 | 68.8 |
SHB5-2井第2轮注水 | 16 | 12 432 | 1.828 9 | 0.444 3 | 259.392 6 | 54.4 |
SHB5-2CH井 | 60 | 11 958 | 0.234 7 | 2.449 5 | 6 331.958 7 | 11.4 |
SHB5-8CH井 | 12 | 6 142 | 1.951 0 | 0.456 8 | 361.702 1 | 5.0 |
SHB5-5H井第1轮注水 | 26 | 3 060 | 2.324 7 | 0.296 8 | 451.130 4 | 61.5 |
SHB5-5H井第2轮注水 | 11 | 7 917 | 2.518 0 | 0.236 8 | 243.916 3 | 35.4 |
SHB5-5H井第3轮注水 | 20 | 6 415 | 1.542 6 | 0.291 1 | 560.925 9 | 18.4 |
SHB5-5H井第4轮注水 | 5 | 3 029 | 1.262 2 | 0.537 8 | 485.185 1 | 31.1 |
SHB5-5H井第5轮注水 | 13 | 3 144 | 1.288 2 | 0.175 8 | 322.500 0 | 5.2 |
Table 4.
Statistics of waterflooding performance by classified parameters"
注水效果 分类 | 焖井 时间/d | 周期累计 注水量/m3 | 周期 注采比/(m3·t-1) | 方水换油率/ (t·m-3) | 单位压力恢复 耗水量/(m3·MPa-1) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
注水受效井 | 10~65(25) | 6 005~14 370(9 300) | 1.08~4.64(2.33) | 0.16~0.66(0.39) | 243~599(397) |
注水失效井 | 5~29(15) | 3 029~9 686(5 300) | 0.86~7.72(1.81) | 0.01~0.53(0.23) | 322~1 045(673) |
注水后开泵井 | 29~60(44) | 493~6 142(3 317) | 0.23~0.49(0.36) | 2.44~16.77(9.60) | 1 825~6 331(4 132) |
Table 5.
Oil pressure and daily oil production for water injection cycles of Well SHB5-4H"
注水补能 阶段 | 第1轮注水 | 第2轮注水 | 第3轮注水 | 第4轮注水 | 第5轮注水 | ||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
日期/ 年-月-日 | 油压/ MPa | 日产 油量/t | 日期/ 年-月-日 | 油压/ MPa | 日产 油量/t | 日期/ 年-月-日 | 油压/ MPa | 日产 油量/t | 日期/ 年-月-日 | 油压/ MPa | 日产 油量/t | 日期/ 年-月-日 | 油压/ MPa | 日产 油量/t | |
注水开始 | 2019-01-14 | 0.98 | 2019-04-29 | 0.66 | 2019-08-01 | 0.63 | 2019-12-03 | 0.62 | 2021-02-25 | 0.81 | |||||
注水结束 | 2019-01-31 | 11.44 | 2019-05-22 | 14.71 | 2019-08-12 | 8.00 | 2020-01-07 | 28.45 | 2021-03-18 | 9.28 | |||||
焖井开始 | 2019-02-01 | 11.44 | 2019-05-23 | 14.71 | 2019-08-13 | 8.00 | 2020-01-08 | 28.45 | 2021-03-19 | 9.28 | |||||
焖井结束 | 2019-02-22 | 16.00 | 2019-06-01 | 25.98 | 2019-10-20 | 4.35 | 2020-02-18 | 25.82 | 2021-03-24 | 8.44 | |||||
开井 | 2019-02-23 | 16.00 | 96.7 | 2019-06-02 | 25.98 | 99.0 | 2019-10-21 | 4.35 | 40.0 | 2020-02-19 | 25.82 | 39.1 | 2021-03-25 | 8.44 | 2.7 |
关井 | 2019-04-28 | 0.66 | 20.0 | 2019-07-31 | 0.63 | 10.0 | 2019-12-02 | 0.62 | 10.0 | 2021-02-24 | 0.81 | 0.8 | 2021-04-17 | 2.61 | 20.7 |
Table 6.
Cumulative data for water injection cycles of Well SHB5-4H"
注水轮次 | 累计 注水量/m3 | 累计 产油量/t | 累计 产液量/t | 周期 时长/d | 单位压降 累计产油量/ (t·MPa-1) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
第1轮 | 6 606.97 | 3 002.06 | 3 059.0 | 100 | 195.69 |
第2轮 | 9 042.00 | 3 305.83 | 3 342.2 | 60 | 130.41 |
第3轮 | 6 005.00 | 988.82 | 1 292.8 | 124 | 265.09 |
第4轮 | 14 369.00 | 7 097.84 | 14 244.1 | 450 | 285.23 |
第5轮 | 9 686.00 | 82.40 | 1 253.7 | 24 | 14.13 |
[1] |
李阳, 康志江, 薛兆杰, 等. 中国碳酸盐岩油气藏开发理论与实践[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2018, 45(4):669-678.
doi: 10.11698/PED.2018.04.12 |
LI Yang, KANG Zhijiang, XUE Zhaojie, et al. Theories and practices of carbonate reservoirs development in China[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2018, 45(4):669-678.
doi: 10.11698/PED.2018.04.12 |
|
[2] | 贾承造. 中国塔里木盆地构造特征与油气[M]. 北京: 石油工业出版社,1997:156-165. |
JIA Chengzao. Structural characteristics and oil and gas in Tarim Basin in China[M]. Beijing: Petroleum Industry Press,1997:156-165. | |
[3] | 罗群, 姜振学. 断裂控藏机理与模式[M]. 北京: 石油工业出版社,2007:145-196. |
LUO Qun, JIANG Zhenxue. Mechanism and model of fault controlling petroleum accmulation[M]. Beijing: Petroleum Industry Press,2007:145-196. | |
[4] | 邬光辉, 陈志勇, 郭群英. 碳酸盐岩变形带特征及其与油气关系:以塔里木盆地下古生界为例[J]. 大地构造与成矿学, 2014, 38(3):580-589. |
WU Guanghui, CHEN Zhiyong, GUO Qunying. Characteristics of carbonate deformation band and its significance for hydrocarbon exploration:An example from the Lower Paleozoic in the Tarim Basin[J]. Geotectonica et Metallogenia, 2014, 38(3):580-589. | |
[5] |
林波, 张旭, 况安鹏, 等. 塔里木盆地走滑断裂构造变形特征及油气意义:以顺北地区1号和5号断裂为例[J]. 石油学报, 2021, 42(7):906-923.
doi: 10.7623/syxb202107006 |
LIN Bo, ZHANG Xu. KUANG Anpeng, et al. Structural deformation characterstics of strike-slip faults in Tarim Basin and their hydrocarbon significance:A case study of No.1 fault and No.5 fault in Shunbei area[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2021, 42(7):906-923. | |
[6] |
江同文, 韩剑发, 邬光辉, 等. 塔里木盆地塔中隆起断控复式油气聚集的差异性及主控因素[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2020, 47(2):213-224.
doi: 10.11698/PED.2020.02.01 |
JIANG Tongwen, HAN Jianfa, WU Guanghui, et al. Differences and controlling factors of composite hydrocarbon accumulations in the Tazhong uplift,Tarim Basin,NW China[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2020, 47(2):213-224. | |
[7] |
云露, 邓尚. 塔里木盆地深层走滑断裂差异变形与控储控藏特征:以顺北油气田为例[J]. 石油学报, 2022, 43(6):770-787.
doi: 10.7623/syxb202206003 |
YUN Lu, DENG Shang. Structural styles of deep strike-slip faults in Tarim Basin and characteristics of their control on reservoir formation and hydrocarbon accumulation:A case study of Shunbei oil and gas field[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2022, 43(6):770-787. | |
[8] | 王清华, 杨海军, 汪如军, 等. 塔里木盆地超深层走滑断裂断控大油气田的勘探发现与技术创新[J]. 中国石油勘探, 2021, 26(4):58-71. |
WANG Qinghua, YANG Haijun, WANG Rujun, et al. Discovery and exploration technology of fault-controlled large oil and gas fields of ultra-deep formation in strike slip fault zone in Tarim Basin[J]. China Petroleum Exploration, 2021, 26(4):58-71. | |
[9] | 窦之林, 张烈辉, 鲁新便, 等. 碳酸盐岩缝洞型油藏注水开发研究[J]. 科技资讯, 2016, 14(5):166-167. |
DOU Zhilin, ZHANG Liehui, LU Xinbian, et al. Waterflooding research in fractured-vuggy carbonate reservoirs[J]. Science and Technology Information, 2016, 14(5):166-167. | |
[10] | 缪津津, 张龙, 刘加元, 等. 塔中碳酸盐岩注水规律及不同储集体类型开发效果分析[C]. 2022油气田勘探与开发国际会议论文集Ⅲ,2022:194-201. |
MIAO Jinjin, ZHANG Long, LIU Jiayuan, et al. Analysis of water injection patterns and development effects of different reservoir types in Tazhong carbonate rocks[C]. Proceedings of the 2022 International Conference on Oil and Gas Field Exploration and Development Ⅲ,2022:194-201. | |
[11] | 王志超. 碳酸盐岩油藏注水开发影响因素分析[J]. 化学工程与装备, 2023, 48(1):99-102. |
WANG Zhichao. Analysis of influencing factors on water injection development of carbonate reservoirs[J]. Chemical Engineering and Equipment, 2023, 48(1):99-102. | |
[12] | 闵华军, 陈利新, 王连山, 等. 哈拉哈塘缝洞型油藏油井产水特征及机理分析[J]. 西南石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2017, 39(1):114-123. |
MIN Huajun, CHEN Lixin, WANG Lianshan, et al. Characteristics and mechanism of water production for fractured vuggy carbonate reservoirs,Halahatang oilfield[J]. Journal of Southwest Petroleum University(Science & Technology Edition), 2017, 39(1):114-123. | |
[13] | 伍齐乔, 李景瑞, 曹飞, 等. 顺北1井区奥陶系断溶体油藏岩溶发育特征[J]. 中国岩溶, 2019, 38(3):444-449. |
WU Qiqiao, LI Jingrui, CAO Fei, et al. Characteristics of fault-karst carbonate reservoirs in the Shunbei No.1 well block,Tarim Basin[J]. Carsologica Sinica, 2019, 38(3):444-449. | |
[14] | 左晨晓, 邓钰三, 刘浪, 等. 低渗薄层碳酸盐岩油藏注水开发效果评价与有效开发技术政策研究:以阿曼M油田USH油藏为例[C]. 2022油气田勘探与开发国际会议论文集Ⅲ,2022:428-435. |
ZUO Chenxiao, DENG Yusan, LIU Lang, et al. Evaluation of water injection development effectiveness and research on effective development technology policies for low permeability thin layer carbonate reservoir: A case study of USH reservoir in Oman M oilfield[C]. Proceedings of the 2022 International Conference on Oil and Gas Field Exploration and Development Ⅲ,2022:428-435. | |
[15] | 李小波, 魏学刚, 刘学利, 等. 顺北油田超深断控缝洞型油藏注水开发实践[J]. 新疆石油地质, 2023, 44(6):702-710. |
LI Xiaobo, WEI Xuegang, LIU Xueli, et al. Practice of water injection development in ultra-deep fault-controlled fractured-vuggy reservoirs in Shunbei oilfield[J]. Xinjiang Petroleum Geology, 2023, 44(6):702-710. | |
[16] | 王远征, 曹仁义, 贾品. 断控缝洞型油藏注采井间油水界面预测方法[J]. 深圳大学学报(理工版), 2024, 41(2):152-162. |
WANG Yuanzheng, CAO Renyi, JIA Pin. Prediction method of oil-water interface between injection and production wells in fault-controlled fractured-cavity reservoirs[J]. Journal of Shenzhen University (Science and Engineering), 2024, 41(2):152-162. | |
[17] | 刘利清, 刘培亮, 蒋林. 塔河油田碳酸盐岩缝洞型油藏量化注水开发技术[J]. 石油钻探技术, 2020, 48(2):104-107. |
LIU Liqing, LIU Peiliang, JIANG Lin. Quantitative water injection technology for cavernous fractured karst carbonate reservoirs in the Tahe oilfield[J]. Petroleum Drilling Technology, 2020, 48(2):104-107. | |
[18] | 鲁新便, 荣元帅, 李小波, 等. 碳酸盐岩缝洞型油藏注采井网构建及开发意义:以塔河油田为例[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2017, 38(4):658-664. |
LU Xinbian, RONG Yuanshuai, LI Xiaobo, et al. Construction of injection-production well pattern in fractured-vuggy carbonate reservoir and its development significance:A case study from Tahe oilfield in Tarim Basin[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2017, 38(4):658-664. | |
[19] | 任永琳, 王达, 冯浦涌, 等. 油田注水开发后期提升采油率的技术措施分析[J]. 石油化工建设, 2022, 44(2):167-169. |
REN Yonglin, WANG Da, FENG Puyong, et al. Analysis of technical measures for improving oil recovery in the late stage of oilfield water injection development[J]. Petroleum and Chemical Construction, 2022, 44(2):167-169. | |
[20] | 赵冰, 顾晓敏, 邓海蓉. 超前注水技术改善低渗透油田开发机理的研究[J]. 石油化工应用, 2009, 28(1):39-40. |
ZHAO Bing, GU Xiaomin, DENG Hairong. Research on improving the development mechanism of low permeability oilfield by advanced water injection technology[J]. Petrochemical Industry Application, 2009, 28(1):39-40. | |
[21] | 屈乐, 孙卫, 刘哲, 等. 牛圈湖油田储层潜在裂缝特征及注水开发对策[J]. 西安石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2010, 25(3):33-37. |
QU Le, SUN Wei, LIU Zhe, et al. Potential fracture characteristics and water injection development strategies of Niuquanhu oilfield reservoir[J]. Journal of Xi’an Shiyou University(Natural Science Edition), 2010, 25(3):33-37. | |
[22] | 宋洪才, 马强. 肇212区块超前注水时间优化研究[J]. 黑龙江科学, 2013, 4(10):38-39. |
SONG Hongcai, MA Qiang. Optimization of advanced water injection time in Zhao 212 block[J]. Heilongjiang Science, 2013, 4(10):38-39. | |
[23] | 李庆辉. 改善特低渗透油藏开发效果途径探讨[J]. 中国石油和化工标准与质量, 2012, 33(9):160. |
LI Qinghui. Exploration of ways to improve the development efficiency of ultra low permeability oil reservoirs[J]. China Petroleum and Chemical Standard and Quality, 2012, 33(9):160. | |
[24] | 万海乔, 王盛, 刘学良. 低孔低渗稠油油藏注水增能效果影响因素[J]. 新疆石油地质, 2023, 44(3):347-351. |
WAN Haiqiao, WANG Sheng, LIU Xueliang. Factors influencing water injection effect in low porosity and low permeability heavy oil reservoirs[J]. Xinjiang Petroleum Geology, 2023, 44(3):347-351. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||