大城凸起煤层地震频率域含气性预测

doi:10.7657/XJPG20200406

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

大城凸起煤层含气性横向变化较大,各向异性强,部分新井钻遇水层,需要进行煤层含气性精细预测。在多井多频正演和地震频谱分析中发现频率对煤层含气性敏感,故采用小波分解和傅里叶变换方法,计算高低频调谐能量比进行煤层含气性预测。通过多井井旁地震高低频调谐能量比与钻采结果统计分析,建立高低频调谐能量比划分煤层含气性的标准,将研究区太原组Ⅵ煤层组划分为3类含气有利区,预测结果与钻探结果符合率达88.9%,取得较好效果。该方法突破了二维地震传统的定性预测,对煤层气井生产部署有较好的指导意义,在类似地区具有推广应用价值。

关键词: 渤海湾盆地, 大城凸起, 二维地震, 煤层, 含气性, 频率域, 高低频调谐能量比, 有利区预测

Abstract:

The coal bed in Dacheng swell is characterized by large lateral variation of gas-bearing property and strong anisotropy. Aquifer has been penetrated in partial newly-drilled wells so that detailed prediction of gas-bearing property needs to be performed for the coal bed. During multi-well multi-frequency forward modeling and seismic spectrum analysis, it is found that frequency is sensitive to coalbed methane, so wavelet decomposition and Fourier transform are used to calculate high/ow frequency tuning energy ratio for gas bearing prediction. Based on the statistical analysis of the tuning energy ratio of multi-well near-well seismic, drilling and production data, the standards for gas-bearing property division with tuning energy ratio are established. According to which the VI coal bed of Taiyuan formation in the study area is divided into three types of favorable gas-bearing areas, and the coincidence rate of the predicted results with the actual drilling data reaches 88.9%, showing a good effect. This method breaks through the traditional qualitative prediction in 2D work area, which can be a guidance for production deployment in coalbed gas wells and is worth promoting and applying in similar areas.

Key words: Bohai Bay basin, Dacheng swell, 2D seismic, coal bed, gas bearing property, frequency domain, tuning energy ratio, favorable area prediction

中图分类号:

P631.414

王云鹏, 苏芮, 毛传龙, 关小曲, 李广业. 大城凸起煤层地震频率域含气性预测[J]. 新疆石油地质, 2020, 41(4): 422-429.

WANG Yunpeng, SU Ri, MAO Chuanlong, GUAN Xiaoqu, LI Guangye. Prediction of Gas Bearing Property in Seismic Frequency Domain for Coal Beds in Dacheng Swell[J]. Xinjiang Petroleum Geology, 2020, 41(4): 422-429.

图/表 12

图1

图2

图3

图4

图5

图6

图7

图8

图9

图10

表1

图11

参考文献 19

[1]	夏志刚, 徐从汤. 大城凸起成藏条件分析[J]. 长江大学学报(自然科学版), 2015,9(5):87-89.
	XIA Zhigang, XU Congtang. Analysis of reservoir forming conditions of Dacheng uplift[J]. Journal of Yangtze University (Natural Science Edition), 2015,9(5):87-89.
[2]	梁生正, 赵克镜, 冯国良, 等. 论大城煤层气藏的发现[J]. 中国煤层气, 1995,1(1):21-23.
	LIANG Shengzheng, ZHAO Kejing, FENG Guoliang, et al. On the discovery of Dacheng coalbed methane reservoir[J]. China Coalbed Methane, 1995,1(1):21-23.
[3]	任朋英. 河北大城煤田煤炭资源概况分析[J]. 能源技术与管理, 2015,40(4):147-148.
	REN Pengying. Analysis of coal resources in Dacheng coalfield,Hebei province[J]. Energy Technology and Management, 2015,40(4):147-148.
[4]	刘玉芳, 于海蓉. 大城勘查区煤层赋存规律及影响因素研究[J]. 煤炭与化工, 2013,36(7):15-17.
	LIU Yufang, YU Hairong. Study on coal seam occurrence and influencing factors in Dacheng exploration area[J]. Coal and Chemical Industry, 2013,36(7):15-17.
[5]	孟美辰, 王彦春, 毛庆辉, 等. 频率衰减梯度属性在沁水盆地南部煤层气预测中的应用[J]. 科学技术与工程, 2016,16(7):139-145.
	MENG Meichen, WANG Yanchun, MAO Qinghui, et al. Application of frequency attenuation gradient attribute in prediction of coalbed methane in the south of Qinshui basin[J]. Science Technology and Engineering, 2016,16(7):139-145.
[6]	刘慧, 张浩, 冯小英. 地球物理含气性预测技术在煤层气中的应用[J]. 中国煤层气, 2019,16(3):226-233.
	LIU Hui, ZHANG Hao, FENG Xiaoying. Application of geophysical gas bearing prediction technology in coalbed methane[J]. China Coalbed Methane, 2019,16(3):226-233.
[7]	张猛刚, 洪忠, 窦玉坛, 等. 时频分析在苏里格地区含气性检测中的应用[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2013,25(5):76-80.
	ZHANG Menggang, HONG Zhong, DOU Yutan, et al. Application of time-frequency analysis in the detection of gas bearing property in Sulige area[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2013,25(5):76-80.
[8]	彭军, 周家雄, 马光克, 等. 高精度三参数小波谱分析法在薄储集层预测中的应用[J]. 新疆石油地质, 2018,39(2):230-235.
	PENG Jun, ZHOU Jiaxiong, MA Guangke, et al. Application of high-precision three-parameter wavelet spectrum analysis in thin reservoir prediction[J]. Xinjiang Petroleum Geology, 2018,39(2):230-235.
[9]	周长友, 李瑞, 杨帆, 等. 基于小波变换的频率衰减梯度属性含气性检测[J]. 石油化工应用, 2010,29(11):59-62.
	ZHOU Changyou, LI Rui, YANG Fan, et al. Gas content detection of frequency attenuation gradient attribute based on wavelet transform[J]. Petrochemical Industry Applications, 2010,29(11):59-62.
[10]	任浩, 李宗杰, 薛姣, 等. 基于稀疏反演的多道匹配追踪地震信号去噪方法及其应用[J]. 石油物探, 2019,58(2):199-207.
	REN Hao, LI Zongjie, XUE Jiao, et al. Denoising method of multi-channel matching tracking seismic signal based on sparse inversion and its application[J]. Geophysical Prospecting for Petroleum, 2019,58(2):199-207.
[11]	朱正平, 雷克辉, 潘仁芳. 沁水盆地和顺区块基于地震多属性分析的煤层含气量预测[J]. 石油物探, 2015,54(2):226-233.
	ZHU Zhengping, LEI Kehui, PAN Renfang. Prediction of coalbed gas content based on seismic multi-attribute analysis in Heshun block Qinshui basin[J]. Geophysical Prospecting for Petroleum, 2015,54(2):226-233.
[12]	陈芳芳, 姜越, 刘金滚, 等. 地震频谱衰减特征在基岩气藏气井分类评价中的应用:以东坪基岩气藏为例[J]. 新疆石油地质, 2019,40(5):600-604.
	CHEN Fangfang, JIANG Yue, LIU Jingun, et al. Application of characteristics of seismic frequency spectrum attenuation in classification and evaluation of gas wells in basement gas reservoirs: a case of Dongping basement gas reservoir[J]. Xinjiang Petroleum Geology, 2019,40(5):600-604.
[13]	李曙光, 徐天吉, 唐建明, 等. 基于频率域小波的地震信号多子波分解及重构[J]. 石油地球物理勘探, 2009,44(6):675-679.
	LI Shuguang, XU Tianji, TANG Jianming, et al. Multi wavelet decomposition and reconstruction of seismic signal based on frequency domain wavelet[J]. Oil Geophysical Prospecting, 2009,44(6):675-679.
[14]	董臣强, 王军, 张金伟. 时频分析技术在三角洲层序分析中的应用[J]. 断块油气田, 2002,9(2):18-20.
	DONG Chenqiang, WANG Jun, ZHANG Jinwei. Application of time-frequency analysis technology in delta sequence analysis[J]. Fault-Block Oil ＆ Gas Field, 2002,9(2):18-20.
[15]	袁志云, 孔令洪, 王成林. 频谱分解技术在储层预测中的应用[J]. 石油地球物理勘探, 2006,41(增刊):11-15.
	YUAN Zhiyun, KONG Linghong, WANG Chenglin. Application of spectrum decomposition technology in reservoir prediction[J]. Oil Geophysical Prospecting, 2006,41(Supp.):11-15.
[16]	徐丽英, 徐鸣洁, 陈振岩. 利用谱分解技术进行薄储层预测[J]. 石油地球物理勘探, 2006,41(3):299-302.
	XU Liying, XU Mingjie, CHEN Zhenyan. Thin reservoir prediction by spectral decomposition technology[J]. Oil Geophysical Prospecting, 2006,41(3):299-302.
[17]	邹文, 陈爱萍, 顾汉明. 联合时频分析技术在地震勘探中的应用[J]. 勘探地球物理进展, 2004,27(4):246-250.
	ZOU Wen, CHEN Aiping, GU Hanming. Application of joint time-frequency analysis technology in seismic exploration[J]. Progress in Exploration Geophysics, 2004,27(4):246-250.
[18]	李海鹏. 基于分频属性反演的涠西南凹陷流三段储层预测[J]. 西部探矿工程, 2020,32(2):85-87.
	LI Haipeng. Reservoir prediction of the third member of Liuxi sag based on frequency division attribute inversion[J]. West-China Exploration Engineering, 2020,32(2):85-87.
[19]	吴波, 王佐强. 地震勘探技术在山西某矿煤层气(瓦斯)预测中的探索研究[J]. 西部探矿工程, 2019,31(11):169-171.
	WU Bo, WANG Zuoqiang. A study on the application of seismic exploration technology in the prediction of coalbed methane (gas) in a mine of Shanxi province[J]. West-China Exploration Engineering, 2019,31(11):169-171.

井名	含气/含水性预测	试采日产量/m³	高低频调谐能量比	预测符合情况
D8井	含水	288.00（水）	0.69	符合
D10井	含水	74.36（水）	0.74	符合
DC1井	低含气	547.00（气）	0.71	不符合
DS1井	含水	3.96（水）	0.81	符合
G8井	含气	177.60（水）	0.65	符合
Sheng1井	含气	干层	0.64	符合
D2井	可凝气层	未测试	0.84	符合
D3井	可凝气层	15.50（水）	0.86	符合
D4井	可凝气层	未测试	0.67	符合
D5井	气浸	未测试	0.68	符合
D9井	含水	42.23（水）	0.63	不符合
DP1井	含水	110.00（水）	0.76	符合
DP3井	含气	1 325.00（气）	0.56	符合
DT2井	高含水	未测试	1.00	符合
DT4x井	含气	未测试	0.62	符合
DT6井	含气	2 898.00（气）	0.61	符合
DT7井	含气	2 898.00（气）	0.53	符合
DT9井	含气	未测试	0.56	符合