海拉尔油田不同区块地应力分布规律

新疆石油地质 ›› 2009, Vol. 30 ›› Issue (1): 81-84.

海拉尔油田不同区块地应力分布规律

程玉琪^1,2, 王树立³, 周志军⁴, 王宏伟⁴, 马英卓⁵, 谷明志⁵

1.南京大学地球科学系,南京210093;
2.中国石油大庆油田有限责任公司第一采油厂,黑龙江大庆163001;
3.中国地质大学,北京100083;
4.大庆石油学院石油工程学院,黑龙江大庆163318;
5.中国石油大庆油田有限责任公司呼伦贝尔分公司,内蒙古海拉尔021000

收稿日期:2008-06-10 修回日期:2008-06-10 出版日期:2009-02-01 发布日期:2020-08-21
作者简介:程玉琪（1965-）,女,黑龙江明水人,高级工程师,在读硕士研究生,油田开发,（Tel）0459-5886322（E-mail）chengyqanna@sina.com.
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金（50634020）重点项目资助,提高油气采收率教育部重点实验室资助

Distribution Rules of Ground Stress in Different Blocks in Hailaer Oilfield

CHENG Yu-qi^1,2, WANG Shu-li³, ZHOU Zhi-jun⁴, WANG Hong-wei⁴, MA Ying-zhuo⁵, GU Ming-zhi⁵

1. Department of Earth Sciences, Nanjing University, Nanjing, Jiangsu 210093, China;
2. No.1 Oil Production Plant, Daqing Oilfield Company Ltd., Daqing, Heilongjiang 163001, China;
3. China University of Geosciences, Beijing 100083, China;
4. Institute of Petroleum Engineering, Daqing Petroleum Institute, Daqing, Heilongjiang 163318, China;
5. Hulunbeier Branch, Daqing Oilfield Company Ltd., PetroChina, Hailaer, Inner Mongolia 021000, China

Received:2008-06-10 Revised:2008-06-10 Online:2009-02-01 Published:2020-08-21

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 海拉尔油田兴安岭群含凝灰质沉积岩及布达特群浅变质岩均属于低孔特低渗储集层,储集层物性差,自然产能低,压裂后油井增加的产能与压裂的效果密切相关。认识储集层的地应力特征,有助于压裂设计时确定裂缝的产状、缝长和缝宽等参数,提高压裂效果。综合分析了已有的地应力计算模型,采用考虑构造应力和热应力影响的地应力计算模式,利用海拉尔油田实际测井资料,分贝28、贝16 及苏131 三个区块进行地应力综合解释,计算出沿深度连续的地应力剖面数据、岩石力学参数等,给出了海拉尔油田不同区块适用的地应力计算数学模型,得出了分区块的纵向和平面地应力分布规律。兴安岭群沉积岩储集层地应力水平较低,在不同深度上表现出较好的线性分布特征;布达特群浅变质岩储集层地应力差值较大,线性规律性不明显。应用波速各向异性、粘滞剩磁法、井筒崩落法和热应变恢复法,确定了海拉尔油田水平最大主应力方向为99~107°,水平最小主应力为9~17°.

关键词: 海拉尔油田, 地应力, 测井曲线, 岩石力学参数

Abstract: The Xing'anling group's tuffaceous sedimentary rock and the Budate group's epimetamorphic rock in Hailaer oilfield belong to low porosity and extra-low permeability reservoir, being characterized by poor physical property, low natural productivity and sensitive hydraulic fracturing effectiveness. A thorough understanding of the current ground stress of the reservoirs can help to determine such parameters as occurrence, length and width of fractures in fracturing design, reducing blindness of hydraulic fracturing operation. Analysis of the existed stress calculation model considering both tectonic stress and thermal stress is made in combination with real well logging data from this oilfield, and the ground stress interpretations of Bei-28, Bei-16 and Su-131 blocks are given, obtaining the stress profiles and the lithomechanics parameters along depth, and mathematical models for stress calculations in different blocks. The calculated vertical and plane stress distribution rules indicate that Xing'anling group's sedimentary reservoir is in lower ground stress and preferable linear distribution feature in different depths, while Budate group's epimetamorphic reservoir appears in big difference of stress, with unclean the linear distribution rule. Applying wave velocity's anisotropy, viscous remanence method, the wellbore caving method and thermal strain recovery method, it is determined that the maximal plane major stress direction ranges from 99° to 107° and the minimal plane major stress direction is from 9°and 17°.

Key words: Hailaer oilfield, ground stress, well logs, lithomechanics parameter

中图分类号:

TU45

程玉琪, 王树立, 周志军, 王宏伟, 马英卓, 谷明志. 海拉尔油田不同区块地应力分布规律[J]. 新疆石油地质, 2009, 30(1): 81-84.

CHENG Yu-qi, WANG Shu-li, ZHOU Zhi-jun, WANG Hong-wei, MA Ying-zhuo, GU Ming-zhi. Distribution Rules of Ground Stress in Different Blocks in Hailaer Oilfield[J]. Xinjiang Petroleum Geology, 2009, 30(1): 81-84.

[1]	于江龙, 陈刚, 吴俊军, 李维, 杨森, 唐廷明. 玛湖凹陷风城组页岩油地质工程甜点地震预测方法及应用[J]. 新疆石油地质, 2022, 43(6): 757-766.
[2]	程正华, 艾池, 张军, 严茂森, 陶飞宇, 白明涛. 胶结型天然裂缝对水力压裂裂缝延伸规律的影响[J]. 新疆石油地质, 2022, 43(4): 433-439.
[3]	王振宇, 林伯韬, 于会永, 石善志, 寇向荣. 克拉玛依油田七区八道湾组砂砾岩油藏地应力特征[J]. 新疆石油地质, 2020, 41(3): 314-320.
[4]	王硕, 覃建华, 杨新平, 李晓山, 张艺, 王英伟. 玛湖地区致密砾岩人工裂缝垂向延伸机理应力模拟[J]. 新疆石油地质, 2020, 41(2): 193-198.
[5]	何小东1，马俊修1，刘刚2，石善志1，游俊2，吴俊涛3. 玛湖油田砾岩储集层岩石力学分析及缝网评价[J]. , 2019, 40(6): 1-1.
[6]	范宇，周小金，曾波，宋毅，周拿云，陈娟. 密切割分段压裂工艺在深层页岩气Zi2井的应用[J]. , 2019, 40(2): 1-1.
[7]	张辉，尹国庆，王志民，王海应. 库车坳陷深层裂缝性砂岩气藏可压裂性评价[J]. , 2019, 40(1): 1-1.
[8]	赵凯1，赵文龙2，石林2，李波3，高辉1，刘顺1. 断块油气藏开采对地应力和破裂压力的影响规律[J]. , 2017, 38(6): 1-1.
[9]	陈胜，张辉，王海应，王益民，刘新宇，袁芳. 塔里木盆地克拉2气田地应力对气田出水的影响[J]. , 2016, 37(5): 1-1.
[10]	琚岩，范坤宇，赵崴，谢恩，徐秋云，张文. 基于地应力特征的水平井井眼轨迹与分段压裂优化技术——以塔里木盆地塔中地区碳酸盐岩储集层为例[J]. , 2016, 37(5): 1-1.
[11]	杨明合1，张杨1，杨虎2，文乾彬2，石建刚2，陈伟峰2. 应用约束分析法建立地应力模型[J]. , 2016, 37(5): 1-1.
[12]	尚飞1，刘峥君2，解习农1. 有机碳含量测井预测方法在泌阳凹陷的应用[J]. , 2016, 37(1): 1-1.
[13]	程林林，程远方，祝东峰，邓文彪，陈冲. 体积压裂技术在煤层气开采中的可行性研究[J]. , 2014, 35(5): 1-1.
[14]	赵振峰1，王文雄1，邹雨时2，雷鑫2，肖博2. 致密砂岩油藏体积压裂裂缝扩展数值模拟研究[J]. , 2014, 35(4): 1-1.
[15]	尹继尧1，王小军1，杨荣荣1，谢宗瑞1，刘作强2. 多测井曲线拟声波重构技术的应用[J]. , 2014, 35(4): 1-1.