新疆石油地质 ›› 2009, Vol. 30 ›› Issue (3): 366-368.

• 油藏工程 • 上一篇    下一篇

用白庙气田气井资料对携液模型进行对比分析

高武彬1, 李闽1, 洪舒娜1, 姜逸伟2, 毕建霞2   

  1. 1.西南石油大学 油气藏地质及开发工程国家重点实验室,成都610500;
    2.中原油田 勘探开发研究院,河南 濮阳457001
  • 收稿日期:2008-08-14 修回日期:2008-11-10 出版日期:2009-06-01 发布日期:2020-10-29
  • 作者简介:高武彬(1985-),男,四川合江人,在读硕士研究生,油气田开发,(Tel)028-83034269(E-mail)g-wubing@163.com.

Analysis and Comparison of Liquid Loading Models with Gas Well Information in Baimiao Gas Field

GAO Wu-bin1, LI Min1, HONG Shu-na1, JIANG Yi-wei2, BI Jian-xia2   

  1. 1. State Key Laboratory of Oil and Gas Reservoir Geology and Exploitation, Southwest Petroleum University, Chengdu, Sichuan 610500,China;
    2. Research Institute of Exploration and Development, Zhongyuan Oilfield Company, PetroChina, Puyang, Henan 457001, China
  • Received:2008-08-14 Revised:2008-11-10 Online:2009-06-01 Published:2020-10-29

摘要: 当前用于计算气井携 液临界流量的著名的模型有Tumer、Coleman、Nosseir和李闽携液模型。在确定气井携液的临界流量中,前三种模型的计算结果相差不大,而李闽模型计算值仅有Turmer临界流量的38%.用白庙气田气井资料对Turmer和李闽携液模型进行了比较研究,结果表明,用后者确定的气井携液的临界流量更准确。

关键词: 白庙气田, 气井, 积液, 携液模型, 临界流速, 临界流量

Abstract: There are four famous models for calculation of liquid loading critical flow rate in a gas well, such as Turner model, Coleman model, Nosseir model and Li Min model. Among these models, the first three models are of small discrepancies, but Li Min model only accounts for 38 percent of Turner model in calculated value. In order to make good use of these critical flow models, a comparative study of Turner model and Li Min model is conducted using the actual field data in this paper. The result shows that the liquid loading critical flow rate in gas well determined by Li Min model is more accurate than that by Turner model.

Key words: Baimiao gas field, gas well, liquid loading, liquid loading model, critical flow rate

中图分类号: