新疆石油地质 ›› 2003, Vol. 24 ›› Issue (4): 353-355.

• 讨论与争鸣 • 上一篇    下一篇

低渗透油层测试资料解释方法

毛伟, 余碧君   

  1. 中国石油 大庆油田有限责任公司 勘探开发研究院,黑龙江 大庆 163712
  • 收稿日期:2002-10-28 修回日期:2002-12-27 发布日期:2021-01-13
  • 作者简介:毛伟(1971-),男,辽宁抚顺人,博士,油藏工程。联系电话:0459-5508554

A Discussion about Interpretation Method for DST Date in Low Permeability Formation

MAO Wei, YU Bi-jun   

  1. Research Institute of Exploration and Development, Daqing Oilfield Co.Ltd, PetroChina, Daqing, Heilongjiang 163712, China
  • Received:2002-10-28 Revised:2002-12-27 Published:2021-01-13

摘要: 应用定产量压力导数方法、Peres卷积和反卷积方法对流动段压力资料进行解释,结果表明,在流动时间足够长的情况下,这3种方法能够求得可靠的地层参数。但Peres卷积和反卷积方法只适用于中期径向流动段,对受井筒储存和边界影响的早期和晚期资料无法分析;定产量压力导数方法的导数曲线通常未达到0.5水平线,多解性较严重。而恢复段的测试时间一般比流动段长,导数曲线比流动段完整,能够反映各种模型的流动特征。故提出一种新方法,即用拟稳定时间和拟稳定产量来等效开井流动过程,然后依据这两个参数采用典型曲线拟合和非线性回归分析方法对恢复段进行分析。应用新方法对10口井的恢复段压力资料进行了解释,并和直线分析方法(压力恢复方法一、二、三)以及平均产量方法进行了对比,结果表明,应用新方法能够求得准确可靠的参数,并能对各种边界情况做出判别。

关键词: 低渗透储集层, 油井, 地层压力检测, 解释, 方法

Abstract: Pressure derivative method at constant flow rate, Peres convolution and deconvolution methods are used to interpret pressure data in flow period. The result shows that reliable formation parameters can be obtained when flow period is long enough. Peres convolution and deconvolution methods are applicable to infinite acting radial flow, but can not be applied to analyze pressure data in early and late periods which are affected by wellbore storage and boundary. Pressure derivative method at constant flow rate has multi-solutions because the pres-sure derivative curve is not on the 0.5 horizontal line. Buildup period is longer than flow period, so the pressure derivative curve is more com-plete, reflecting flow regime of various models. A new method is proposed which use pseudo-steady time and pseudo-steady flow rate to sim-ulate flow period. According to these two parameters, typical curve match and non-linear regression methods are used to analyze the buildup period. Pressure buildup data from 10 wells are interpreted using the proposed method. The interpreted results are correlated with results of linear analysis methods (three kinds of pressure buildup methods) and average flow rate method. The results show that the new method is more accurate and reliable and makes identification of variable boundary conditions.

Key words: low permeability reservoir, oil well, formation pressure detection, interpretation, method

中图分类号: