砾岩储集层岩石矿物组成及其结构对聚合物表面活性剂二元复合驱提高采收率的影响

doi:10.7657/XJPG20250213

新疆石油地质 ›› 2025, Vol. 46 ›› Issue (2): 231-239.doi: 10.7657/XJPG20250213

砾岩储集层岩石矿物组成及其结构对聚合物表面活性剂二元复合驱提高采收率的影响

张朝良(), 李钧, 晏晓龙, 吕建荣(), 张德富, 窦萍

1.中国石油新疆油田分公司勘探开发研究院，新疆克拉玛依 834000
2.陕西科技大学化学与化工学院，西安 710021
3.中国科学院大学渗流流体力学研究所，北京 100049

收稿日期:2024-06-19 修回日期:2024-08-11 出版日期:2025-04-01 发布日期:2025-03-26
通讯作者: 吕建荣（1980-），男，甘肃靖远人，高级工程师，博士研究生，提高原油采收率，（Tel）0990-6879279（Email）lvjianrong1@163.com
作者简介:张朝良（1990-），男，吉林松原人，工程师，硕士，油田化学，（Tel）15709904525（Email）958004918@qq.com
基金资助:
中国石油科技专项(2023ZZ22);新疆维吾尔自治区天山英才青年拔尖人才计划(2023TSYCCX0003)

Impacts of Rock Mineral Composition and Structure of Conglomerate Reservoirs on Enhanced Oil Recovery of Polymer-Surfactant Binary Flooding

ZHANG Chaoliang(), LI Jun, YAN Xiaolong, LYU Jianrong(), ZHANG Defu, DOU Ping

1. Research Institute of Exploration and Development, Xinjiang Oilfield Company, PetroChina, Karamay, Xinjiang 834000, China
2. College of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Shaanxi University of Science and Technology, Xi’an, Shaanxi 710021, China
3. Institute of Percolation and Fluid Mechanics, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China

Received:2024-06-19 Revised:2024-08-11 Online:2025-04-01 Published:2025-03-26

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

针对砾岩储集层矿物组成复杂、表面物理化学性质活跃、易与聚合物和表面活性剂发生相互作用，造成二元复合驱配方体系在地下发生损失与改变的问题，选取不同类型砾岩储集层岩心开展微观结构研究，分析矿物组成及含量，测定比表面和Zeta电位，建立化学剂在不同类型砾岩储集层岩心上的吸附图版，最后通过驱油实验，验证不同类型砾岩储集层岩石矿物组成及其结构对二元复合驱采出程度的影响。结果表明，砾岩储集层中，黏土矿物和沸石类矿物比表面大，Zeta电位较高，其活跃的物理化学性质会影响驱油效率。Ⅰ类储集层的岩心物性最好，总采出程度最高；活跃矿物含量最少的Ⅱ类储集层岩心化学驱驱油效率最高；Ⅲ类储集层岩心驱油效率最低。

关键词: 砾岩储集层, 矿物组成, 表面活性剂, 聚合物, 物理化学性质, 吸附, 采收率

Abstract:

The complex mineral components of conglomerate reservoirs have active surface physical and chemical properties, making them liable to interact with polymers and surfactants. These interactions may result in loss and alteration of binary flooding formulations underground. By using core samples from different types of conglomerate reservoirs, the microscopic structure and mineral composition/content were investigated, specific surface area and Zeta potential were measured, and the adsorption charts of chemical agents on the cores were established. Through oil displacement experiments, the impacts of rock mineral composition and structure of conglomerate reservoirs on the recovery of polymer-surfactant binary flooding was validated. The results show that in conglomerate reservoirs, clay and zeolite minerals have large specific surface areas and high Zeta potentials, and their active physical and chemical properties affect oil displacement efficiency. The cores from Class I reservoirs with the best petrophysical properties exhibited the highest ultimate recovery factor, the cores from Class II reservoirs with the lowest content of active minerals achieved the highest chemical flooding efficiency, while the cores from Class III reservoirs showed the lowest oil displacement efficiency.

Key words: conglomerate reservoir, mineral composition, surfactant, polymer, physical and chemical property, adsorption, recovery factor

中图分类号:

TE39

张朝良, 李钧, 晏晓龙, 吕建荣, 张德富, 窦萍. 砾岩储集层岩石矿物组成及其结构对聚合物表面活性剂二元复合驱提高采收率的影响[J]. 新疆石油地质, 2025, 46(2): 231-239.

ZHANG Chaoliang, LI Jun, YAN Xiaolong, LYU Jianrong, ZHANG Defu, DOU Ping. Impacts of Rock Mineral Composition and Structure of Conglomerate Reservoirs on Enhanced Oil Recovery of Polymer-Surfactant Binary Flooding[J]. Xinjiang Petroleum Geology, 2025, 46(2): 231-239.

图/表 13

表1

表2

图1

图2

图3

表3

表4

图4

图5

图6

图7

图8

图9

参考文献 27

[1]	廖广志, 王强, 王红庄, 等. 化学驱开发现状与前景展望[J]. 石油学报, 2017, 38(2):196-207. doi: 10.7623/syxb201702007
	LIAO Guangzhi, WANG Qiang, WANG Hongzhuang, et al. Chemical flooding development status and prospect[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2017, 38(2):196-207. doi: 10.7623/syxb201702007
[2]	HAMMOND P S, UNSAL E. Spontaneous imbibition of surfactant solution into an oil-wet capillary:Wettability restoration by surfactant contaminant complexation[J]. Langmuir, 2011, 27(8):4412-4429.
[3]	周雅萍, 刘家林, 于涛, 等. 碱/表面活性剂二元复合驱提高普通稠油采收率室内实验研究[J]. 精细石油化工进展, 2009, 10(9):20-23.
	ZHOU Yaping, LIU Jialin, YU Tao, et al. Laboratory experimental study on improving the recovery rate of ordinary heavy oil by alkaline/surfactant binary composite flooding[J]. Progress in Fine Petrochemical Industry, 2009, 10(9):20-23.
[4]	王德民. 走向新世纪的大庆油田开发:王德民院士报告论文集[M]. 北京: 石油工业出版社, 2001.
	WANG Demin. Daqing oilfield development towards the new century:Collected papers of academician Wang Demin’s report[M]. Beijing: Petroleum Industry Press, 2001.
[5]	关文婷, 张晓芹, 蔡志彪, 等. 大庆油田三类油层弱碱三元复合驱表面活性剂浓度优化[J]. 大庆石油地质与开发, 2023, 42(2):99-107.
	GUAN Wenting, ZHANG Xiaoqin, CAI Zhibiao, et al. Surfactant concentration optimization of weak alkali ASP flooding system for Class Ⅲ reservoirs in Daqing oilfield[J]. Petroleum Geology & Oilfield Development in Daqing, 2023, 42(2):99-107.
[6]	闫强伟, 韩创辉, 李文娟. 一种新型低伤害有机碱三元复合驱油体系[J]. 大庆石油地质与开发, 2023, 42(1):115-122.
	YAN Qiangwei, HAN Chuanghui, LI Wenjuan. New low-damage organic alkali ASP flooding system[J]. Petroleum Geology & Oilfield Development in Daqing, 2023, 42(1):115-122.
[7]	HIRASAKI G J, MILLER C A, PUERTO M. Recent advances in surfactant EOR[J]. SPE Journal, 2011, 16(4):889-907.
[8]	王杰, 黎鸿屿, 吕栋梁, 等. 非均质油藏层间干扰室内实验优化[J]. 新疆石油地质, 2024, 45(2):199-204.
	WANG Jie, LI Hongyu, LYU Dongliang, et al. Optimized laboratory experiment on interlayer interference in heterogeneous reservoirs[J]. Xinjiang Petroleum Geology, 2024, 45(2):199-204.
[9]	付亚荣, 窦勤光, 刘泽, 等. 中国老油田二次开发现状及前景[J]. 新疆石油地质, 2023, 44(6):739-750.
	FU Yarong, DOU Qinguang, LIU Ze, et al. Secondary development of mature oilfields in China: Current status and prospects[J]. Xinjiang Petroleum Geology, 2023, 44(6):739-750.
[10]	周成裕, 萧瑛, 张斌. 国内化学驱油技术的研究进展[J]. 日用化学工业, 2011, 41(2):131-135.
	ZHOU Chengyu, XIAO Ying, ZHANG Bin. Progress of research work on chemical flooding technology in China[J]. China Surfactant Detergent & Cosmetics, 2011, 41(2):131-135.
[11]	周雅萍, 赵庆辉, 刘宝良, 等. 化学驱油方法提高稠油油藏采收率实验研究[J]. 精细石油化工进展, 2011, 12(5):3-9.
	ZHOU Yaping, ZHAO Qinghui, LIU Baoliang, et al. Laboratory study on increasing oil recovery of heavy oil reservoir by chemical flooding[J]. Advances in Fine Petrochemicals, 2011, 12(5):3-9.
[12]	刚永恒, 和慧, 胡莉, 等. 二元复合驱提高采收率技术的发展综述[J]. 油气田地面工程, 2010, 29(12):61-62.
	GANG Yongheng, HE Hui, HU Li, et al. A review of the development of binary composite flooding technology for enhancing oil recovery[J]. Oil-Gas Field Surface Engineering, 2010, 29(12):61-62.
[13]	钱根葆, 许长福, 陈玉琨, 等. 砂砾岩储集层聚合物驱油微观机理:以克拉玛依油田七东1区克拉玛依组下亚组为例[J]. 新疆石油地质, 2016, 37(1):56-61.
	QIAN Genbao, XU Changfu, CHEN Yukun, et al. Microscopic mechanism of polymer flooding in glutenite reservoir of lower Karamay formation in east District-7(1),Karamay oilfield[J]. Xinjiang Petroleum Geology, 2016, 37(1):56-61.
[14]	朱水桥, 钱根葆, 刘顺生, 等. 克拉玛依砾岩油藏二次开发[M]. 北京: 石油工业出版社, 2015.
	ZHU Shuiqiao, QIAN Genbao, LIU Shunsheng, et al. Secondary development of conglomerate reservoir in Karamay[M]. Beijing: Petroleum Industry Press, 2015.
[15]	YU Zhichao, WANG Zhizhang, DANIEL A C. Genesis of authigenic clay minerals and their impacts on reservoir quality in tight conglomerate reservoirs of the Triassic Baikouquan formation in the Mahu sag,Junggar Basin,western China[J]. Marine and Petroleum Geology, 2023,148:106041.
[16]	LI Bowen, SUN Linghui, LIU Xiangu, et al. Effects of clay mineral content and types on pore-throat structure and interface properties of the conglomerate reservoir:A case study of Baikouquan formation in the Junggar Basin[J]. Minerals, 2023,13:1-26.
[17]	郭晖, 纪宝强, 杨森, 等. 准噶尔盆地环玛湖凹陷二叠系砂砾岩储层沸石类胶结物的形成及石油地质意义[J]. 石油学报, 2022, 43(3):341-354. doi: 10.7623/syxb202203002
	GUO Hui, JI Baoqiang, YANG Sen, et al. Formation of zeolite cements in Permian sandy conglomerate reservoir in the circum-Mahu sag,Junggar Basin and its petroleum geological significance[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2022, 43(3):341-354. doi: 10.7623/syxb202203002
[18]	栾和鑫, 唐文洁, 陈艳萍, 等. 砾岩油藏复合驱过程中化学剂的吸附滞留规律[J]. 油田化学, 2021, 38(3):504-507.
	LUAN Huoxin, TANG Wenjie, CHEN Yanping, et al. Adsorption and retention law of chemicals agent in process of compound flooding in conglomerate reservoir[J]. Oilfield Chemistry, 2021, 38(3):504-507.
[19]	中华人名共和国国家发展和改革委员会.岩石毛管压力曲线测定法:SY/T 5346—2005[S]. 北京: 中国石油工业出版社, 2005.
	National Development and Reform Commission.Rock capillary pressure measurement:SY/T 5346—2005[S]. Beijing: China Petroleum Industry Press, 2005.
[20]	国家能源局.沉积岩中黏土矿物和常见非黏土矿物X射线衍射分析方法:SY/T 5163—2018[S]. 北京: 中国石油工业出版社, 2018.
	National Energy Administration.Analysis method for clay minerals and ordinary non-clay minerals in sedimentary rocks by X-ray diffraction:SY/T 5163—2018[S]. Beijing: China Petroleum Industry Press, 2018.
[21]	ZHONG Xun, PU Hui, ZHOU Yanxia, et al. Comparative study on the static adsorption behavior of zwitterionic surfactants on minerals in middle Bakken formation[J]. Energy & Fuels, 2019,33:1007-1015.
[22]	赵帅, 田雨, 郑皓轩, 等. 非离子表面活性剂在黏土矿物表面的吸附规律研究[J]. 应用化工, 2023, 52(9):2728-2732.
	ZHAO Shuai, TIAN Yu, ZHENG Haoxuan, et al. Study on the adsorption law of non ionic surfactants on the surface of clay minerals[J]. Applied Chemical Industry, 2023, 52(9):2728-2732.
[23]	陈权生, 张恩瑜, 刘卫东, 等. ASP复合驱油体系在新疆砾岩储集层中的吸附特性分析[J]. 科学技术与工程, 2016, 16(22):53-59.
	CHEN Quansheng, ZHANG Enyu, LIU Weidong, et al. Analysis of ASP compound flooding adsorption behavior on conglomerate reservoirs in Xinjiang[J]. Science Technology and Engineering, 2016, 16(22):53-59.
[24]	赵福麟. 油田化学[M]. 山东东营: 中国石油大学出版社, 2010.
	ZHAO Fulin. Oilfield chemistry[M]. Dongying,Shandong: China University of Petroleum Press, 2010.
[25]	DERJAGUIN B, LANDAU L. Theory of the stability of strongly charged lyophobic sols and of the adhesion of strongly charged particles in solutions of electrolytes[J]. Progress in Surface Science, 1993,43:30-59.
[26]	ELIMELECH M, O’MELIA C R. Kinetics of deposition of colloidal particles in porous media[J]. Environmental Science & Technology, 1990, 24(10):1528-1536.
[27]	李道山. 三元复合驱表面活性剂吸附及碱的作用机理研究[D]. 黑龙江大庆: 东北石油大学, 2003.
	LI Daoshan. Study on the adsorption mechanism of surfactant and alkali in ternary composite flooding[D]. Daqing, Heilongjiang: Northeast Petroleum University, 2003.

岩心编号	分选系数	偏态	峰态	变异系数	饱和度中值压力/ MPa	饱和度中值半径/ μm	排驱压力/ MPa	最大孔喉半径/μm	视退汞效率/%	视孔喉体积比	平均毛细管半径/μm	均质系数	非饱和孔隙体积/ %
Y1	3.46	0.31	1.77	0.46	0.17	4.30	0.01	81.75	25.50	2.92	18.58	0.18	3.47
Y2	3.31	0.07	1.65	0.30	1.63	1.16	0.02	30.30	36.79	1.72	8.20	0.16	10.59
Y3	2.30	-0.38	1.92	0.21	3.98	0.18	0.50	1.66	51.56	0.94	0.91	0.14	21.87
Y4	1.10	-2.08	6.67	0.08			1.91	0.38	29.35	2.41	0.08	0.14	53.62

储集层类型	孔隙类型	孔隙结构参数					物性参数
储集层类型	孔隙类型	变异系数	中值压力/MPa	排驱压力/MPa	孔喉半径/μm	最大连通喉道半径/μm	孔隙度/%	渗透性
Ⅰ类	原生粒间孔、粒间溶孔	>0.30	<2.2	较低	>80	<15.00	>20、>100	好—极好
Ⅱ类	原生粒间孔、粒间溶孔	0.15~0.30	2.2~4.0	0.2~0.7	<80	7.50~1.40	15~20、50~100	中等
Ⅲ类	杂基内微孔、晶间孔	0.16~0.22	4.0~6.0	0.5~1.1	偏小	1.40~0.83	10~15、30~50	差
Ⅳ类	杂基内微孔、晶间孔	<0.10	<4.0	>1.0	很小	0.38	<10、<30	很差

储集层矿物组构	样品名称	BET比表面积/ （m²·g^-1）	Langmuir比表面积/ （m²·g^-1）
岩石骨架矿物	石英	0.05	0.12
岩石骨架矿物	长石	1.47	2.89
碳酸盐矿物	方解石	3.67	5.71
碳酸盐矿物	白云石	0.84	1.67
黏土矿物	高岭石	15.70	22.67
	伊利石	20.62	21.06
	绿泥石	23.76	25.87
	蒙脱石	40.21	57.54
硅铝酸盐矿物	沸石	31.58	43.24
砾岩储集层天然岩心	Y1	3.50	4.94
	Y2	2.13	3.12
	Y3	4.40	5.45
	Y4	2.12	3.15

样品名称	Zeta电位/mV
高岭石	-8.98
蒙脱石	-21.03
伊利石	-8.18
绿泥石	-17.80
方解石	0.22
长石	-4.75
沸石	-24.47
Y1	-28.45
Y2	-18.21
Y3	-21.57
Y4	-19.41
聚合物	-3.87
KPS表面活性剂	-37.70

砾岩储集层岩石矿物组成及其结构对聚合物表面活性剂二元复合驱提高采收率的影响

Impacts of Rock Mineral Composition and Structure of Conglomerate Reservoirs on Enhanced Oil Recovery of Polymer-Surfactant Binary Flooding

RichHTML

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 13

参考文献 27

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	赵吉儿, 冉崎, 谢冰, 赖强, 白利, 朱迅. 四川盆地凉高山组全尺寸孔隙半径分布表征方法[J]. 新疆石油地质, 2025, 46(2): 181-191.
[2]	代金友, 雷禧桢, 师洋阳, 潘志扬, 沈小述, 张立娟, 周晓峰. 致密砂岩气藏低采收率成因[J]. 新疆石油地质, 2025, 46(2): 224-230.
[3]	张琦, 朱永贤, 韩天会. 三塘湖油田NJH区块中黏油CO₂近混相驱实验及应用[J]. 新疆石油地质, 2025, 46(1): 114-120.
[4]	魏鸿坤, 王健, 王丹翎, 路宇豪, 周娅芹, 赵鹏. 高盐低渗透油藏CO₂泡沫微观尺度耐盐性及调驱效果[J]. 新疆石油地质, 2024, 45(6): 703-710.
[5]	李远铎, 丁帅伟, 张蒙, 许川, 樊纹宇, 屈传超. 考虑封存机理的低渗透油藏CO₂驱油与封存注采参数敏感性分析[J]. 新疆石油地质, 2024, 45(6): 711-718.
[6]	陈军军, 杨兴利, 辛毅超, 柳朝阳, 仝波文. 鄂尔多斯盆地延长油田双河西区块长6油藏开发参数[J]. 新疆石油地质, 2024, 45(5): 552-559.
[7]	周丛丛, 曹瑞波, 孙洪国, 樊宇, 郭松林, 梁国良. 大庆油田二类B油层聚驱剖面动用规律及其改善[J]. 新疆石油地质, 2024, 45(5): 567-573.
[8]	黄召庭, 李春涛, 汪斌, 乔霞, 付莹, 闫炳旭. 带油环凝析气藏衰竭式开发中—后期提高采收率[J]. 新疆石油地质, 2024, 45(4): 470-474.
[9]	肖志朋, 张彦斌, 李启航, 李宜强, 韩继凡, 闫茜, 吴永恩. 玉果油田果8区块减氧空气驱低温氧化对采收率的影响[J]. 新疆石油地质, 2024, 45(3): 334-339.
[10]	宋平, 崔晨光, 张记刚, 刘凯, 邓振龙, 谭龙, 禹希科. 玛湖凹陷上乌尔禾组强敏感油藏CO₂同步吞吐试验[J]. 新疆石油地质, 2024, 45(3): 355-361.
[11]	丁帅伟, 张蒙, 李远铎, 许川, 周义鹏, 高群, 于红岩. 致密油藏CO₂吞吐驱油和封存注采参数敏感性分析——以鄂尔多斯盆地延长组长7段致密油藏典型储集层为例[J]. 新疆石油地质, 2024, 45(2): 181-188.
[12]	魏鸿坤, 王健, 许天寒, 路宇豪, 周娅芹, 王俊衡. CO₂对稠油油藏的物性调控及辅助蒸汽驱提高采收率[J]. 新疆石油地质, 2024, 45(2): 221-227.
[13]	吕晓光, 李伟. 多层砂岩油田热采油藏管理提高采收率[J]. 新疆石油地质, 2024, 45(1): 65-71.
[14]	赵晨云, 窦松江, 窦煜, 柳朝阳, 黄博, 王振宇, 李刚. 高含水期油藏剩余油聚集度表征方法[J]. 新疆石油地质, 2023, 44(6): 690-695.
[15]	李世瑞, 赵凯, 徐江伟, 木尔扎提·艾斯卡尔, 徐金禄, 张星. 三塘湖盆地MZ区块致密油藏CO₂吞吐提高采收率[J]. 新疆石油地质, 2023, 44(5): 572-576.