基于核磁共振的天然气驱储集层孔喉动用下限

doi:10.7657/XJPG20230108

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

依据核磁共振原理，推导岩心核磁共振弛豫时间与孔喉半径的关系，结合岩心高压压汞孔喉半径分布，利用数值差值和最小二乘法，将核磁共振T₂谱转换为孔喉半径分布。在此基础上，利用岩心驱替过程中含油饱和度和核磁共振信号幅度同步逐渐降低的规律，分析不同注气速度、注气压力和位置下不同孔喉半径的核磁共振信号幅度变化，确定不同开发方式下的孔喉动用下限。研究表明，微米级孔隙中的原油是水驱采收率的主要贡献者，低注气速度下孔喉动用下限为0.04 μm，高注气速度下孔喉动用下限为0.01 μm；注气压力由5.0 MPa升高到17.0 MPa时，孔喉动用下限从0.05 μm下降到0.01 μm；注气压力较高时，岩心整体孔喉动用较均匀；随着注气压力的升高，主要动用半径小于0.01 μm孔隙内的剩余油。

关键词: 天然气驱, 水驱, 核磁共振, 高压压汞, 孔喉半径, 动用下限, 注气速度, 注气压力

Abstract:

Based on the principle of nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR)，the relationship between NMR relaxation time and pore throat radius of core sample was derived. Combining with the pore throat radius distribution obtained from high-pressure mercury intrusion test，the NMR T₂ spectrum was converted into the pore throat radius distribution by using the numerical difference and the least square methods. Then，according to the law that the oil saturation and NMR signal amplitude gradually decrease synchronously during core displacement process，the changes in the NMR signal amplitude of different pore throat radii under different gas injection rates，gas injection pressures and positions were analyzed，and the lower pore throat producing limits for different development patterns were determined. The results show that the crude oil in micron-sized pores is the main contributor to water flooding recovery. The minimum pore throat producing limit is 0.04 μm at low gas injection rate and 0.01 μm at high gas injection rate. When the gas injection pressure increases from 5.0 MPa to 17.0 MPa，the lower pore throat producing limit decreases from 0.05 μm to 0.01 μm. When the gas injection pressure is high，the overall pore throat producing degree of the core is relatively uniform. With the increase of gas injection pressure，the remaining oil in the pores with the radius less than 0.01 μm is mainly produced.

Key words: natural gas drive, water flooding, NMR, high-pressure mercury intrusion, pore throat radius, producing limit, gas injection rate, gas injection pressure

中图分类号:

TE122.23

白振强, 王清华, 宋文波. 基于核磁共振的天然气驱储集层孔喉动用下限[J]. 新疆石油地质, 2023, 44(1): 58-63.

BAI Zhenqiang, WANG Qinghua, SONG Wenbo. Lower Limits of Pore Throat Producing in Natural Gas Drive Reservoirs Based on Nuclear Magnetic Resonance[J]. Xinjiang Petroleum Geology, 2023, 44(1): 58-63.

图/表 7

图1

图2

图3

图4

图5

图6

图7

参考文献 20

[1]	江同文, 孙雄伟. 中国深层天然气开发现状及技术发展趋势[J]. 石油钻采工艺, 2020, 42(5):610-621.
	JIANG Tongwen, SUN Xiongwei. Development status and technology development trend of deep natural gas in China[J]. Oil Drilling & Production Technology, 2020, 42(5):610-621.
[2]	SHENG J J. Enhanced oil recovery in shale reservoirs by gas injection[J]. Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering, 2015, 22:252-259. doi: 10.1016/j.jngse.2014.12.002
[3]	WANG Lei, TIAN Ye, YU Xiangyu, et al. Advances in improved/enhanced oil recovery technologies for tight and shale reservoirs[J]. Fuel, 2017, 210:425-445. doi: 10.1016/j.fuel.2017.08.095
[4]	PU Wanfen, WEI Bing, JIN Fayang, et al. Experimental investigation of CO₂ huff-n-puff process for enhancing oil recovery in tight reservoirs[J]. Chemical Engineering Research and Design, 2016, 111:269-276. doi: 10.1016/j.cherd.2016.05.012
[5]	LUO Peng, LUO Weiguo, LI Sheng. Effectiveness of miscible and immiscible gas flooding in recovering tight oil from Bakken reservoirs in Saskatchewan,Canada[J]. Fuel, 2017, 208:626-636. doi: 10.1016/j.fuel.2017.07.044
[6]	陈世杰, 孙雷, 潘毅, 等. 潜山油藏微球-天然气驱实验评价[J]. 新疆石油地质, 2022, 43(4):468-473.
	CHEN Shijie, SUN Lei, PAN Yi, et al. Experimental evaluation on microsphere-natural gas flooding in buried-hill reservoirs[J]. Xinjiang Petroleum Geology, 2022, 43(4):468-473.
[7]	李爱芬, 任晓霞, 王桂娟, 等. 核磁共振研究致密砂岩孔隙结构的方法及应用[J]. 中国石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2015, 39(6):92-98.
	LI Aifen, REN Xiaoxia, WANG Guijuan, et al. Characterization of pore structure of low permeability reservoirs using a nuclear magnetic resonance method[J]. Journal of China University of Petroleum(Edition of Natural Science), 2015, 39(6):92-98.
[8]	唐红娇, 梁宝兴, 刘伟洲, 等. 吉木萨尔凹陷芦草沟组页岩储集层流动孔喉下限[J]. 新疆石油地质, 2021, 42(5):612-616.
	TANG Hongjiao, LIANG Baoxing, LIU Weizhou, et al. Lower limits of pore throat radius for movable fluids in shale reservoirs of Lucaogou formation in Jimsar sag[J]. Xinjiang Petroleum Geology, 2021, 42(5):612-616.
[9]	崔哲治, 孙卫. 基于高压压汞与核磁共振的致密砂岩孔隙结构研究:以苏里格气田山西组与下石盒子组为例[J]. 非常规油气, 2020, 7(2):49-55.
	CUI Zhezhi, SUN Wei. Study on pore structure of tight sandstone based on high pressure mercury and nuclear magnetic resonance:take Shanxi formation and Shihezi formation in Sulige gas field as examples[J]. Unconventional Oil & Gas, 2020, 7(2):49-55.
[10]	王振华, 陈刚, 李书恒, 等. 核磁共振岩心实验分析在低孔渗储层评价中的应用[J]. 石油实验地质, 2014, 36(6):773-779.
	WANG Zhenhua, CHEN Gang, LI Shuheng, et al. Application of NMR core experimental analysis in evaluation of low-porosity and low-permeability sandstone reservoirs[J]. Petroleum Geology & Experiment, 2014, 36(6) :773-779.
[11]	孙小龙, 张宪国, 林承焰, 等. 基于核磁共振标定的高压压汞孔喉分布定量评价方法[J]. 岩矿测试, 2017, 36(6):601-607.
	SUN Xiaolong, ZHANG Xianguo, LIN Chengyan, et al. Quantita-tive evaluation method of HPMI pore-throat distribution based on NMR calibration[J]. Rock and Mineral Analysis, 2017, 36(6):601-607.
[12]	肖佃师, 卢双舫, 陆正元, 等. 联合核磁共振和恒速压汞方法测定致密砂岩孔喉结构[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2016, 43(6):961-970.
	XIAO Dianshi, LU Shuangfang, LU Zhengyuan, et al. Combining nuclear magnetic resonance and rate-controlled porosimetry to probe the pore-throat structure of tight sandstones[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2016, 43(6):961-970.
[13]	DURRETT R. Oriented percolation in two dimensions[J]. Annuls of Probability, 1984, 12(4):999-1 040.
[14]	TOUMELIN E, TORRES-VERDIN C, SUN B, et al. Random-walk technique for simulating NMR measurements and 2D NMR maps of porous media with relaxing and permeable boundaries[J]. Journal of Magnetic Resonance, 2007, 188(1):83-96. pmid: 17632022
[15]	运华云, 赵文杰, 刘兵开, 等. 利用T₂分布进行岩石孔隙结构研究[J]. 测井技术, 2002, 26(1):18-21.
	YUN Huayun, ZHAO Wenjie, LIU Bingkai, et al. Researching rock pore structure with T₂ distribution[J]. Well Logging Technology, 2002, 26(1):18-21.
[16]	王学武, 杨正明, 李海波, 等. 核磁共振研究低渗透储层孔隙结构方法[J]. 西南石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2010, 32(2):69-72.
	WANG Xuewu, YANG Zhengming, LI Haibo, et al. Nuclear magnetic resonance study on pore structure of low permeability reservoirs[J]. Journal of Southwest Petroleum University(Science & Technology Edition), 2010, 32(2):69-72.
[17]	李艳, 范宜仁, 邓少贵, 等. 核磁共振岩心实验研究储层孔隙结构[J]. 勘探地球物理进展, 2008, 31(2):129-132.
	LI Yan, FAN Yiren, DENG Shaogui, et al. Nuclear magnetic resonance core experiment study on reservoir pore structure[J]. Progress in Exploration Geophysics, 2008, 31(2):129-132.
[18]	WANG Kewen, LI Ning. Numerical simulation of rock pore-throat structure effects on NMR T₂ distribution[J]. Applied Geophysics, 2008, 5(2):86-91. doi: 10.1007/s11770-008-0013-7
[19]	冯波, 刘万涛, 刘广峰, 等. 陇东长7致密油藏气驱喉道动用半径下限[J]. 大庆石油地质与开发, 2019, 38(3):159-166.
	FENG Bo, LIU Wantao, LIU Guangfeng, et al. Developed radius limit for the throat by the gas flooding in Longdong Chang-7 tight oil reservoir[J]. Petroleum Geology & Oilfield Development in Daqing, 2019, 38(3):159-166.
[20]	WAN Tao, WANG Weimin, JIANG Jiaqi, et al. Pore-scale analysis of gas huff-n-puff enhanced oil recovery and water flooding process[J]. Fuel, 2018, 215:561-571. doi: 10.1016/j.fuel.2017.11.033