基于示踪剂监测和数值模拟的低渗透油藏注采连通性评价

doi:10.7657/XJPG20210613

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

长庆油田作为中国低渗透油藏开发的典型油田,拥有储量巨大的致密油气资源。由于其储集层非均质性强、注采连通性差,油藏采收率普遍不高,亟需对油藏开发单元进行精细描述,以提高中—高含水期井组开发效果。以长庆油田Q011-35井组为研究对象,基于目的层长6₁砂体接触类型划分,采用微量物质示踪剂监测与油藏数值模拟结合的方法,从平面和剖面综合评价井组水驱效果。结果表明：Q011-35井组储集层非均质性较强,平面上,在西北和正西方向发育高渗条带;剖面上,长$6^2_1$砂体较长$6^1_1$砂体水洗程度高,长$6^1_1$剩余油更富集,明确了砂体连通状态和注采对应关系为剩余油分布的主控因素。微量物质示踪剂监测与油藏数值模拟结合的方法克服了采用单一方法评价井间连通性的局限性,结果更加准确可靠,为精细评价低渗透油藏水驱开发效果、制定剩余油挖潜措施提供借鉴。

关键词: 长庆油田, 低渗透油藏, 示踪剂监测, 数值模拟, 非均质性, 砂体接触类型, 连通通道, 水驱效果

Abstract:

As a typical oilfield developing low-permeability reservoirs in China, Changqing oilfield has huge resources of tight oil and gas. However, strong reservoir heterogeneity, poor injection-production connectivity and low oil recovery make it urgent to describe the reservoir development units in details to improve the development effects of well groups at medium-high water cut stage. Taking well group Q011-35 as a case, this study evaluated the waterflooding development effect of the well group based on the contact types of the target Chang 6₁ sand bodies and the results of tracer monitoring and reservoir numerical simulation. It is concluded that the well group Q011-35 is strongly heterogeneous. Laterally, there are high-permeability zones in the northwest and southwest, while vertically, Chang $6^2_1$ is flooded more completely than Chang $6^1_1$, and the remaining oil in Chang $6^1_1$ is richer, indicating reservoir connectivity and injection-production relationship are controlling factors on the distribution of remaining oil. The combination of tracer monitoring and reservoir numerical simulation eliminates the limitations caused by a single method in evaluating interwell connectivity, therefore the results are more accurate and reasonable. The conclusion is a reference to fine evaluation on waterflooding development effect of low-permeability reservoirs and taking effective measures for potential tapping of remaining oil.

Key words: Changqing oilfield, low-permeability reservoir, tracer monitoring, numerical simulation, heterogeneity, sand body contact type, communication channel, waterflooding effect

中图分类号:

TE348

李宁, 杨林, 郑小敏, 张金海, 刘怡辰, 马炯. 基于示踪剂监测和数值模拟的低渗透油藏注采连通性评价[J]. 新疆石油地质, 2021, 42(6): 735-740.

LI Ning, YANG Lin, ZHENG Xiaomin, ZHANG Jinhai, LIU Yichen, MA Jiong. Evaluation on Injection-Production Connectivity of Low-Permeability Reservoirs Based on Tracer Monitoring and Numerical Simulation[J]. Xinjiang Petroleum Geology, 2021, 42(6): 735-740.

图/表 7

图1

图2

图3

表1

图4

图5

表2

参考文献 27

[1]	吴天江, 刘显, 杨海恩, 等. 低渗透油藏注采动态连通性评价方法[J]. 断块油气田, 2014, 21(1):79-82.
	WU Tianjiang, LIU Xian, YANG Haien, et al. A method to evaluate dynamic connectivity of injection and production in low permeability reservoir[J]. Fault-Block Oil & Gas Field, 2014, 21(1):79-82.
[2]	李文龙. 密井网区井震结合储层描述方法[J]. 大庆石油地质与开发, 2016, 35(4):137-142.
	LI Wenlong. Reservoir describing technique by the well-seismic combination for the dense well patterns[J]. Petroleum Geology and Oilfield Development in Daqing, 2016, 35(4):137-142.
[3]	陈坤, 何文祥, 魏君. 井间示踪剂在油藏连通性分析中的应用:以马厂油田为例[J]. 长江大学学报(自科版), 2015, 12(8):70-73.
	CHEN Kun, HE Wenxiang, WEI Jun. Application of interwell tracer method in analysis of reservoir connectivity[J]. Journal of Yangtze University(Natural Science Edition), 2015, 12(8):70-73.
[4]	赵辉, 康志江, 孙海涛, 等. 水驱开发多层油藏井间连通性反演模型[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2016, 43(1):99-106.
	ZHAO Hui, KANG Zhijiang, SUN Haitao, et al. An interwell connectivity inversion model for waterflooded multilayer reservoirs[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2016, 43(1):99-106.
[5]	刘妍, 司志伟, 廖磊, 等. F区块长$2_2^2$小层井间砂体连通性分析及应用[J]. 科技通报, 2020, 36(1):32-37.
	LIU Yan, SI Zhiwei, LIAO Lei, et al. Interwell sandbody connectivity analysis and application of Chang $2_2^2$ small layer in Block F,Ordos basin[J]. Bulletin of Science and Technology, 2020, 36(1):32-37.
[6]	聂新强, 周玉辉, 钱致颖, 等. 砂体井间连通动态特征的精细刻画及分类表征方法[J]. 辽宁工程技术大学学报(自然科学版), 2021, 40(1):14-27.
	NIE Xinqiang, ZHOU Yuhui, QIAN Zhiying, et al. Fine description and classification characterization method for dynamic feature of interwell connectivity in sandstone reservoirs[J]. Journal of Liaoning Technical University(Natural Science), 2021, 40(1):14-27.
[7]	王任一. 基于生产动态数据的井间储层连通性识别方法[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2019, 40(2):443-450.
	WANG Renyi. An approach to recognize interwell reservoir connectivity based on production data[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2019, 40(2):443-450.
[8]	宋吉水, 王岩楼, 廖广志, 等. 井间示踪技术[M]. 北京: 石油工业出版社, 2003.
	SONG Jishui, WANG Yanlou, LIAO Guangzhi, et al. Interwell tracer technique[M]. Beijing: Petroleum Industry Press, 2003.
[9]	BRIGHAM W E, SMITH D H. Prediction of tracer behavior in five-spot flow[R]. SPE 1130, 1965.
[10]	李淑霞, 冯其红. 用图版法分析示踪剂产出曲线[J]. 石油钻采工艺, 2003, 25(3):51-54.
	LI Shuxia, FENG Qihong. Type-curve matching method to analyze multi-well tracer test[J]. Oil Drilling & Production Technology, 2003, 25(3):51-54.
[11]	孙涛, 窦宏恩, 邹存友, 等. 井间动态连通性评价新方法研究[J]. 特种油气藏, 2017, 24(2):110-114.
	SUN Tao, DOU Hong’en, ZOU Cunyou, et al. A new method for inter-well dynamic communication evaluation[J]. Special Oil and Gas Reservoirs, 2017, 24(2):110-114.
[12]	张新宝, 李留仁. 碳酸盐岩缝洞型油藏井间连通性的示踪剂监测:以塔河油田T402注采井组为例[J]. 西安石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2019, 34(6):55-59.
	ZHANG Xinbao, LI Liuren. Tracer monitoring of inter-well connectivity in fracture-vuggy carbonate reservoir:a case study of T402 injection-production well group in Tahe oilfield[J]. Journal of Xi’an Shiyou University(Natural Science Edition), 2019, 34(6):55-59.
[13]	王文环, 彭缓缓, 李光泉, 等. 特低渗透油藏水驱规律及最佳驱替模式[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2019, 40(1):182-189.
	WANG Wenhuan, PENG Huanhuan, LI Guangquan, et al. Waterflooding and optimum displacement pattern for ultra low permeability reservoirs[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2019, 40(1):182-189.
[14]	吴忠宝, 南北杰, 王改娥. 低渗透油藏大型整体压裂数值模拟:以鄂尔多斯盆地靖安油田五里湾一区为例[J]. 油气地质与采收率, 2006, 13(6):101-104.
	WU Zhongbao, NAN Beijie, WANG Gaie. Numerical simulation of large-scale integral fracturing in low-permeability oil reservoirs: taking No.1 Wuliwan block in Jing’an oilfield,Ordos basin as an example[J]. Petroleum Geology and Recovery Efficiency, 2006, 13(6):101-104.
[15]	李小波, 彭小龙, 史英. 井间示踪剂测试在缝洞型油藏的应用[J]. 石油天然气学报, 2008, 30(6):271-274.
	LI Xiaobo, PENG Xiaolong, SHI Ying. Application of interwell tracer testing in fracture-cavity reservoirs[J]. Journal of Oil and Gas Technology, 2008, 30(6):271-274.
[16]	赵辉, 姚军, 吕爱民, 等. 利用注采开发数据反演油藏井间动态连通性[J]. 中国石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2010, 34(6):91-94.
	ZHAO Hui, YAO Jun, LÜ Aimin, et al. Reservoir interwell dynamic connectivity inversion based on injection and production data[J]. Journal of China University of Petroleum(Edition of Natural Science), 2010, 34(6):91-94.
[17]	袁士宝, 刘文强, 蒋海岩, 等. 基于储层特性的碳酸盐岩缝洞型油藏开发方式[J]. 油气地质与采收率, 2021, 28(1):80-87.
	YUAN Shibao, LIU Wenqiang, JIANG Haiyan, et al. Investigation into development modes of fracture-cavity carbonate reservoirs based on reservoir characteristics[J]. Petroleum Geology and Recovery Efficiency, 2021, 28(1):80-87.
[18]	屈亚光, 孙敬. 复杂断块油藏砂体连通性对水驱效果的影响[J]. 特种油气藏, 2017, 24(2):94-98.
	QU Yaguang, SUN Jing. Influence of sandbody connectivity in complex fault block reservoirs on water flooding effect[J]. Special Oil and Gas Reservoirs, 2017, 24(2):94-98.
[19]	郑忠博, 刘月田, 冯月丽, 等. 非均质复杂断块油藏渗流规律与挖潜研究[J]. 油气井测试, 2016, 25(1):30-32.
	ZHENG Zhongbo, LIU Yuetian, FENG Yueli, et al. Reservoir seepage law and the potential research of heterogeneous complicated fault block[J]. Well Testing, 2016, 25(1):30-32.
[20]	李宁, 郑小敏, 刘东明, 等. 井震结合综合评价低渗透裂缝油藏水驱效果[J]. 测井技术, 2017, 41(6):718-722.
	LI Ning, ZHENG Xiaomin, LIU Dongming, et al. Well-seismic comprehensive assessment water injection effect for X well group[J]. Well Logging Technology, 2017, 41(6):718-722.
[21]	秦民君, 李宁, 郑小敏, 等. 生产测井资料在低渗透裂缝性油藏精细数值模拟中的应用[J]. 测井技术, 2018, 42(6):684-688.
	QIN Minjun, LI Ning, ZHENG Xiaomin, et al. Application of production logging data in the fine numerical simulation of low-permeability fractured reservoir[J]. Well Logging Technology, 2018, 42(6):684-688.
[22]	曹琳, 修建龙, 黄立信, 等. 基于无网格法的微生物驱数值模拟[J]. 新疆石油地质, 2021, 42(2):206-212.
	CAO Lin, XIU Jianlong, HUANG Lixin, et al. Meshless method-based numerical simulation of microbial flooding[J]. Xinjiang Petroleum Geology, 2021, 42(2):206-212.
[23]	宿晓岑, 巩磊, 高帅, 等. 陇东地区长7段致密储集层裂缝特征及定量预测[J]. 新疆石油地质, 2021, 42(2):161-167.
	SU Xiaocen, GONG Lei, GAO Shuai, et al. Characteristics and quantitative prediction of fractures of tight reservoir in Chang 7 member in Longdong area[J]. Xinjiang Petroleum Geology, 2021, 42(2):161-167.
[24]	赵向原, 吕文雅, 王策, 等. 低渗透砂岩油藏注水诱导裂缝发育的主控因素:以鄂尔多斯盆地安塞油田W区长6油藏为例[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2020, 41(3):586-595.
	ZHAO Xiangyuan, LYU Wenya, WANG Ce, et al. Major factors controlling waterflooding-induced fracture development in low-permeability reservoirs:a case study of Chang 6 reservoir in W block in Ansai oilfield,Ordos basin[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2020, 41(3):586-595.
[25]	林博. 胜坨油田河流相储层建筑结构分析与剩余油分布研究[D]. 山东青岛:中国石油大学(华东), 2007.
	LIN Bo. Shengtuo oilfield fluvial facies reservoir architectural elements analysis and remaining oil research[D]. Qingdao,Shandong:China University of Petroleum(East China), 2007.
[26]	陈欢庆, 赵应成, 舒治睿, 等. 储层构型研究进展[J]. 特种油气藏, 2013, 20(5):7-13.
	CHEN Huanqing, ZHAO Yingcheng, SHU Zhirui, et al. Advances in reservoir architecture research[J]. Special Oil and Gas Reservoirs, 2013, 20(5):7-13.
[27]	张国辉, 任晓娟, 张宁生. 微裂缝对低渗储层水驱油渗流规律的影响[J]. 西安石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2007, 22(5):44-47.
	ZHANG Guohui, REN Xiaojuan, ZHANG Ningsheng. Experimental study on the effect of micro-fracture on the water displacing oil law in low-permeability reservoir[J]. Journal of Xi’an Shiyou University(Natural Science Edition), 2007, 22(5):44-47.