玛湖凹陷玛页1井风城组页岩油地质甜点优选

doi:10.7657/XJPG20240303

新疆石油地质 ›› 2024, Vol. 45 ›› Issue (3): 271-278.doi: 10.7657/XJPG20240303

玛湖凹陷玛页1井风城组页岩油地质甜点优选

李娜^1a(), 李卉^1a, 刘鸿^1b, 陈方文²(), 杨森^1a, 邹阳^1a

1.中国石油新疆油田分公司 a.勘探开发研究院；b.数据公司，新疆克拉玛依 834000
2.中国石油大学（华东）地球科学与技术学院，山东青岛 266580

收稿日期:2024-01-23 修回日期:2024-03-05 出版日期:2024-06-01 发布日期:2024-05-23
通讯作者: 陈方文（1984-），男，湖北仙桃人，副教授，博士，页岩油气勘探，（Tel）18661856579（Email）chenfw@upc.edu.cn
作者简介:李娜（1989-），女，山东青岛人，工程师，硕士，油气勘探，（Tel）18152901514（Email）lnq05@petrochina.com.cn
基金资助:
新疆维吾尔自治区“天山英才”科技创新领军人才支持项目(2022TSYCJ0070);中国石油前瞻性基础性技术攻关项目(2022DJ0108);山东省自然科学基金(ZR2022YQ30);中国石油攻关性应用性科技专项(2023ZZ15)

Optimization of Geological Sweet Spots for Shale Oil in Fengcheng Formation in Well Maye-1, Mahu Sag

LI Na^1a(), LI Hui^1a, LIU Hong^1b, CHEN Fangwen²(), YANG Sen^1a, ZOU Yang^1a

1. PetroChina Xinjiang Oilfield Company, a.Research Institute of Exploration and Development; b.Data Company, Karamay, Xinjiang 834000, China
2. School of Geosciences, China University of Petroleum, Qingdao, Shandong 266580, China

Received:2024-01-23 Revised:2024-03-05 Online:2024-06-01 Published:2024-05-23

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

玛湖凹陷风城组属于具有物源多、岩性复杂、整体含油、甜点分散等特征的混积型碱湖沉积，为了对页岩油进行高效勘探和开发，需要对页岩油地质甜点优选。以高压压汞、岩石热解等实验结果为基础，对玛页1井风城组储集层及其页岩油可动性等进行评价，构建页岩油地质甜点优选模型，评价页岩油地质甜点垂向分布特征。结果表明：孔隙度、总有机碳含量、脆性矿物含量和游离烃含量与100倍总有机碳含量之差分别是评价风城组储集层储集性能、含油性、脆性和页岩油可动性的参数；利用4个参数构建页岩油地质甜点优选模型，玛页1井风城组一类、二类和三类页岩油地质甜点的页岩油甜点因子分别为大于0.282 3、0.011 1~0.282 3和小于0.011 1；玛页1井风城组一类页岩油地质甜点主要分布在风二段上部和风三段，岩性以泥岩和白云质泥岩为主。

关键词: 准噶尔盆地, 玛湖凹陷, 玛页1井, 风城组, 页岩油, 地质甜点, 高压压汞

Abstract:

The Fengcheng formation in the Mahu sag is a typical alkaline lacustrine deposit characterized by mixed provenance, complex lithology, overall oil possibility, and scattered sweet spots. To efficiently explore and develop the shale oil, it is necessary to optimize geological sweet spots for the shale oil. Based on the results of high-pressure mercury injection and rock pyrolysis experiments, the reservoir and shale oil mobility of the Fengcheng formation in Well Maye-1 were evaluated, a model for optimizing geological sweet spots for the shale oil was constructed, and the vertical distribution of geological sweet spots for the shale oil was assessed. The results show that porosity, total organic carbon content, brittle mineral content, and difference between free hydrocarbon content and 100 times of total organic carbon content are parameters for respectively evaluating the reservoir performance, oil-bearing property, brittleness, and shale oil mobility of the Fengcheng formation. A model for optimizing geological sweet spots for the shale oil was constructed by using these four parameters, with sweet spot factors for Class Ⅰ, Ⅱ, and Ⅲ shale oil geological sweet spots in Well Maye-1 being greater than 0.282 3, ranging from 0.011 1 to 0.282 3, and less than 0.011 1, respectively. Class Ⅰ shale oil geological sweet spots in the Fengcheng formation in Well Maye-1 are mainly distributed in the upper part of the second member of Fengcheng formation and in the third member of Fengcheng formation, with lithology dominated by mudstone and dolomitic mudstone.

Key words: Junggar basin, Mahu sag, Well Maye-1, Fengcheng formation, shale oil, geological sweet spot, high-pressure mercury injection

中图分类号:

TE122

李娜, 李卉, 刘鸿, 陈方文, 杨森, 邹阳. 玛湖凹陷玛页1井风城组页岩油地质甜点优选[J]. 新疆石油地质, 2024, 45(3): 271-278.

LI Na, LI Hui, LIU Hong, CHEN Fangwen, YANG Sen, ZOU Yang. Optimization of Geological Sweet Spots for Shale Oil in Fengcheng Formation in Well Maye-1, Mahu Sag[J]. Xinjiang Petroleum Geology, 2024, 45(3): 271-278.

图/表 8

图1

图2

图3

图4

图5

图6

图7

图8

参考文献 32

[1]	贾承造, 庞雄奇, 宋岩. 论非常规油气成藏机理:油气自封闭作用与分子间作用力[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2021, 48(3):437-452. doi: 10.11698/PED.2021.03.01
	JIA Chengzao, PANG Xiongqi, SONG Yan. The mechanism of unconventional hydrocarbon formation:Hydrocarbon self-containment and intermolecular forces[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2021, 48(3):437-452.
[2]	李志明, 何晋译, 刘雅慧, 等. 陆相页岩油“甜点”段评价关键参数界限探讨[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2023, 44(6):1453-1467.
	LI Zhiming, LIU Yahui, HE Jinyi, et al. Limits of critical parameters for sweet-spot interval evaluation of lacustrine shale oil[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2023, 44(6):1453-1467.
[3]	孙龙德, 赵文智, 刘合, 等. 页岩油“甜点”概念及其应用讨论[J]. 石油学报, 2023, 44(1):1-13. doi: 10.7623/syxb202301001
	SUN Longde, ZHAO Wenzhi, LIU He, et al. Concept and application of “sweet spot” in shale oil[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2023, 44(1):1-13. doi: 10.7623/syxb202301001
[4]	高波, 何文渊, 冯子辉, 等. 松辽盆地古龙页岩岩性、物性、含油性特征及控制因素[J]. 大庆石油地质与开发, 2022, 41(3):68-79.
	GAO Bo, HE Wenyuan, FENG Zihui, et al. Lithology,physical property,oil-bearing property and their controlling factors of Gulong shale in Songliao basin[J]. Petroleum Geology & Oilfield Development in Daqing, 2022, 41(3):68-79.
[5]	邹才能, 冯有良, 杨智, 等. 中国湖盆细粒重力流沉积作用及其对页岩油“甜点段”发育的影响[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2023, 50(5):883-897. doi: 10.11698/PED.20220483
	ZOU Caineng, FENG Youliang, YANG Zhi, et al. Fine-grained gravity flow sedimentation and its influence on development of shale oil sweet spot intervals in lacustrine basins in China[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2023, 50(5):883-897.
[6]	金之钧, 朱如凯, 梁新平, 等. 当前陆相页岩油勘探开发值得关注的几个问题[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2021, 48(6):1276-1287. doi: 10.11698/PED.2021.06.20
	JIN Zhijun, ZHU Rukai, LIANG Xinping, et al. Several issues worthy of attention in current lacustrine shale oil exploration and development[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2021, 48(6):1276-1287.
[7]	金之钧, 梁新平, 王小军, 等. 玛湖凹陷风城组页岩油富集机制与甜点段优选[J]. 新疆石油地质, 2022, 43(6):631-639.
	JIN Zhijun, LIANG Xinping, WANG Xiaojun, et al. Shale oil enrichment mechanism and sweet spot selection of Fengcheng formation in Mahu sag,Junggar basin[J]. Xinjiang Petroleum Geology, 2022, 43(6):631-639.
[8]	刘财广, 季瑞雪, 王伟, 等. 玛湖凹陷风城组页岩油产量影响因素及甜点评价[J]. 新疆石油地质, 2022, 43(6):733-742.
	LIU Caiguang, JI Ruixue, WANG Wei, et al. Factors influencing shale oil production and sweet spot evaluation of Fengcheng formation,Mahu sag[J]. Xinjiang Petroleum Geology, 2022, 43(6):733-742.
[9]	易良平, 杨长鑫, 杨兆中, 等. 天然裂缝带对深层页岩压裂裂缝扩展的影响规律[J]. 天然气工业, 2022, 42(10):84-97.
	YI Liangping, YANG Changxin, YANG Zhaozhong, er al. Influence of natural fracture zones on the propagation of hydraulic fractures in deep shale[J]. Natural Gas Industry, 2022, 42(10):84-97.
[10]	郑国伟, 高之业, 黄立良, 等. 准噶尔盆地玛湖凹陷二叠系风城组页岩储层润湿性及其主控因素[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2022, 43(5):1206-1220.
	ZHENG Guowei, GAO Zhiye, HUANG Liliang, et al. Wettability of the Permian Fengcheng formation shale in the Mahu sag,Junggar basin,and its main control factors[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2022, 43(5):1206-1220.
[11]	李嘉蕊, 杨智, 王兆云, 等. 准噶尔盆地玛湖凹陷二叠系风城组页岩油赋存定量表征及其主控因素[J]. 石油实验地质, 2023, 45(4):681-692.
	LI Jiarui, YANG Zhi, WANG Zhaoyun, et al. Quantitative characterization and main controlling factors of shale oil occurrence in Permian Fengcheng formation,Mahu sag,Junggar basin[J]. Petroleum Geology & Experiment, 2023, 45(4):681-692.
[12]	邹阳, 韦盼云, 曹元婷, 等. 碱湖型页岩油“甜点”分类与主控因素:以准噶尔盆地风城组为例[J]. 石油学报, 2023, 44(3):458-470. doi: 10.7623/syxb202303005
	ZOU Yang, WEI Panyun, CAO Yuanting, et al. Classification and main controlling factors of sweet spots of alkaline lake type shale oil:A case study of Fengcheng formation in Junggar basin[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2023, 44(3):458-470. doi: 10.7623/syxb202303005
[13]	常佳琦, 姜振学, 高之业, 等. 玛湖凹陷风城组不同岩相页岩含油性及可动性特征[J]. 中南大学学报(自然科学版), 2022, 53(9):3354-3367.
	CHANG Jiaqi, JIANG Zhenxue, GAO Zhiye, et al. Oil bearing and mobility characteristics of different lithofacies shales in Fengcheng formation,Mahu sag[J]. Journal of Central South University(Science and Technology), 2022, 53(9):3354-3367.
[14]	冯有良, 杨智, 张洪, 等. 咸化湖盆细粒重力流沉积特征及其页岩油勘探意义:以准噶尔盆地玛湖凹陷风城组为例[J]. 地质学报, 2023, 97(3):839-863.
	FENG Youliang, YANG Zhi, ZHANG Hong, et al. Fine-grained gravity flow sedimentary features and their petroleum significance within saline lacustrine basins:A case study of the Fengcheng formation in Mahu depression,Junggar basin,China[J]. Acta Geologica Sinica, 2023, 97(3):839-863.
[15]	邓儒炳, 阎建国, 张雪纯, 等. 玛湖凹陷风二段页岩油藏甜点地震响应特征不确定性分析[J]. 石油物探, 2021, 60(4):611-620. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-1441.2021.04.010
	DENG Rubing, YAN Jianguo, ZHANG Xuechun, et al. Uncertainty analysis of seismic response of Feng-2 shale oil sweet spots in the Mahu depression[J]. Geophysical Prospecting for Petroleum, 2021, 60(4):611-620. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-1441.2021.04.010
[16]	宋永, 杨智峰, 何文军, 等. 准噶尔盆地玛湖凹陷二叠系风城组碱湖型页岩油勘探进展[J]. 中国石油勘探, 2022, 27(1):60-72.
	SONG Yong, YANG Zhifeng, HE Wenjun, et al. Exploration progress of alkaline lake type shale oil of the Permian Fengcheng formation in Mahu sag,Junggar basin[J]. China Petroleum Exploration, 2022, 27(1):60-72.
[17]	邹阳, 戚艳平, 宋栋, 等. 玛页1井风城组页岩油藏地质特征及甜点评价[J]. 新疆石油地质, 2022, 43(6):714-723.
	ZOU Yang, QI Yanping, SONG Dong, et al. Geological characteristics and sweet spot evaluation of shale oil reservoir in Fengcheng formation in Well Maye-1[J]. Xinjiang Petroleum Geology, 2022, 43(6):714-723.
[18]	王然, 吴涛, 尤新才, 等. 玛湖凹陷二叠系风城组页岩油储层岩相特征及定量评价[J]. 石油学报, 2023, 44(7):1085-1096. doi: 10.7623/syxb202307005
	WANG Ran, WU Tao, YOU Xincai, et al. Petrographic characteristics and quantitative comprehensive evaluation of shale oil reservoirs in Permian Fengcheng formation,Mahu sag[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2023, 44(7):1085-1096. doi: 10.7623/syxb202307005
[19]	高岗, 刘诗局, 靳军, 等. 原油物性演化规律新发现及其对页岩油勘探的启示[J]. 地质学报, 2023, 97(5):1561-1575.
	GAO Gang, LIU Shiju, JIN Jun, et al. A new discovery of physical property evolution of crude oil and insights into shale oil exploration[J]. Acta Geologica Sinica, 2023, 97(5):1561-1575.
[20]	尤新才, 高岗, 吴俊, 等. 准噶尔盆地玛南地区风城组烃源岩地球化学特征及有效性差异[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2021, 32(11):1697-1708.
	YOU Xincai, GAO Gang, WU Jun, et al. Differences of effectivity and geochemical characteristics of the Fengcheng formation source rock in Ma’nan area of the Junggar basin[J]. Natural Gas Geoscience, 2021, 32(11):1697-1708.
[21]	唐勇, 何文军, 姜懿洋, 等. 准噶尔盆地二叠系咸化湖相页岩油气富集条件与勘探方向[J]. 石油学报, 2023, 44(1):125-143. doi: 10.7623/syxb202301008
	TANG Yong, HE Wenjun, JIANG Yiyang, et al. Enrichment conditions and exploration direction of Permian saline lacustrine shale oil and gas in Junggar basin[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2023, 44(1):125-143. doi: 10.7623/syxb202301008
[22]	潘松圻, 郭秋雷, 邹才能, 等. 页岩型与粉砂岩型“页岩油系统”甜点段判识:以鄂尔多斯盆地长7段为例[J]. 中国科学:地球科学, 2023, 53(7):1663-1678.
	PAN Songqi, GUO Qiulei, ZOU Caineng, et al. Identification of sweet spots in shale-type and siltstone-type “shale oil systems”:A case study of the Chang 7 member in Ordos basin[J]. Science China:Earth Sciences, 2023, 53(7):1663-1678.
[23]	CHEN Fangwen, ZHENG Qiang, LU Shuangfang, et al. Classification of the tight oil reservoir storage space in the Raoyang sag of the Jizhong depression in the Bohai Bay basin,China[J]. Energy Science & Engineering, 2020, 8(1):1-15.
[24]	卢双舫, 黄文彪, 陈方文, 等. 页岩油气资源分级评价标准探讨[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2012, 39(2):249-256.
	LU Shuangfang, HUANG Wenbiao, CHEN Fangwen, et al. Classification and evaluation criteria of shale oil and gas resources:Discussion and application[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2012, 39(2):249-256.
[25]	卢双舫, 薛海涛, 王民, 等. 页岩油评价中的若干关键问题及研究趋势[J]. 石油学报, 2016, 37(10):1309-1322. doi: 10.7623/syxb201610012
	LU Shuangfang, XUE Haitao, WANG Min, et al. Several key issues and research trends in evaluation of shale oil[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2016, 37(10):1309-1322. doi: 10.7623/syxb201610012
[26]	印森林, 陈恭洋, 许长福, 等. 陆相混积细粒储集岩岩相构型及其对甜点的控制作用:以准噶尔盆地吉木萨尔凹陷二叠系芦草沟组页岩油为例[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2022, 43(5):1180-1193.
	YIN Senlin, CHEN Gongyang, XU Changfu, et al. Lithofacies architecture of lacustrine fine-grained mixed reservoirs and its control over sweet spot:A case study of Permian Lucaogou formation shale oil reservoir in the Jimsar sag,Juggar basin[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2022, 43(5):1180-1193.
[27]	JARVIE D M. Shale resource systems for oil and gas:Part 2 shale oil resource systems[C]//BREYER J A. Shale reservoirs giant resources for the 21st century:AAPG Memoir 97. Tulsa: American Association of Petroleum Geologists, 2012:89-119.
[28]	孙焕泉, 蔡勋育, 周德华, 等. 中国石化页岩油勘探实践与展望[J]. 中国石油勘探, 2019, 24(5):569-575. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-7703.2019.05.004
	SUN Huanquan, CAI Xunyu, ZHOU Dehua, et al. Practice and prospect of Sinopec shale oil exploration[J]. China Petroleum Exploration, 2019, 24(5):569-575. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-7703.2019.05.004
[29]	赵文智, 卞从胜, 蒲秀刚, 等. 中国典型咸化湖盆页岩油富集与流动特征及在“甜点”评价中的意义[J]. 中国石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2023, 47(5):25-37.
	ZHAO Wenzhi, BIAN Congsheng, PU Xiugang, et al. Enrichment and flow characteristics of shale oil in typical salinized lake basins in China and its significance for “sweet spot” evaluation[J]. Journal of China University of Petroleum(Edition of Natural Science), 2023, 47(5):25-37.
[30]	王伟, 王振林, 刘财广, 等. 页岩油甜点评价关键技术及甜点类型划分:以玛湖凹陷二叠系风城组为例[J]. 地球科学, 2023, 48(1):223-234.
	WANG Wei, WANG Zhenlin, LIU Caiguang, et al. Key technology of shale oil sweet spot evaluation and sweet spot type division in Fengcheng formation of Mahu sag[J]. Earth Science, 2023, 48(1):223-234.
[31]	钱永新, 邹阳, 赵辛楣, 等. 准噶尔盆地玛湖凹陷玛页1井二叠系风城组全井段岩心剖析与油气地质意义[J]. 油气藏评价与开发, 2022, 12(1):204-214.
	QIAN Yongxin, ZOU Yang, ZHAO Xinmei, et al. Full core analysis and petroleum geological significance of Permian Fengcheng formation in Well‑MY1,Mahu sag[J]. Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2022, 12(1):204-214.
[32]	姜福杰, 黄任达, 胡涛, 等. 准噶尔盆地玛湖凹陷风城组页岩油地质特征与分级评价[J]. 石油学报, 2022, 43(7):899-911. doi: 10.7623/syxb202207002
	JIANG Fujie, HUANG Renda, HU Tao, et al. Geological characteristics and classification evaluation of shale oil in Fengcheng formation in Mahu sag,Junggar basin[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2022, 43(7):899-911.

玛湖凹陷玛页1井风城组页岩油地质甜点优选

Optimization of Geological Sweet Spots for Shale Oil in Fengcheng Formation in Well Maye-1, Mahu Sag

RichHTML

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 8

参考文献 32

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	王剑, 刘金, 潘晓慧, 张宝真, 李二庭, 周新艳. 吉木萨尔凹陷芦草沟组页岩油生烃母质及其生烃机理[J]. 新疆石油地质, 2024, 45(3): 253-261.
[2]	蒋奇君, 李勇, 肖正录, 路俊刚, 秦春雨, 张少敏. 川中地区大安寨段页岩热演化史及油气地质意义[J]. 新疆石油地质, 2024, 45(3): 262-270.
[3]	毛锐, 白雨, 王盼, 黄志强. 玛西斜坡区风城组高含盐致密储集层流体识别[J]. 新疆石油地质, 2024, 45(3): 279-285.
[4]	朱越, 伍顺伟, 邓玉森, 刘林, 雷祥辉, 牛有牧. 玛湖凹陷风城组储集层孔喉结构及流体赋存特征[J]. 新疆石油地质, 2024, 45(3): 286-295.
[5]	卞保力, 苏东旭, 蒋文龙, 王学勇, 潘进, 刘龙松, 蒋中发. 玛湖凹陷及周缘白碱滩组勘探突破与新认识[J]. 新疆石油地质, 2024, 45(3): 296-305.
[6]	覃建华, 李映艳, 杜戈峰, 周阳, 邓远, 彭寿昌, 肖佃师. 基于核磁共振测井的页岩油产能分析及甜点评价[J]. 新疆石油地质, 2024, 45(3): 317-326.
[7]	万涛, 张景, 董岩. 玛湖凹陷致密砾岩油藏不同开发方式下原油微观可动性[J]. 新疆石油地质, 2024, 45(3): 327-333.
[8]	宋平, 崔晨光, 张记刚, 刘凯, 邓振龙, 谭龙, 禹希科. 玛湖凹陷上乌尔禾组强敏感油藏CO₂同步吞吐试验[J]. 新疆石油地质, 2024, 45(3): 355-361.
[9]	盖姗姗, 王子振, 刘浩杰, 张文盛, 于文政, 杨崇翔, 王玉萍. 永进油田致密储集层岩石力学参数剖面构建及应用[J]. 新疆石油地质, 2024, 45(3): 362-370.
[10]	支东明, 陈旋, 杨润泽, 刘俊田, 于海跃, 马强. 准噶尔盆地东部残留海相凹陷勘探实践及全油气系统[J]. 新疆石油地质, 2024, 45(2): 127-138.
[11]	刘超威, 李辉, 王泽胜, 王秋玉, 谢知益, 黄志强, 张蓉. 准噶尔盆地阜康凹陷二叠系上乌尔禾组油气勘探突破与启示[J]. 新疆石油地质, 2024, 45(2): 139-150.
[12]	熊婷, 刘宇, 陈文利, 仲伟军, 贾春明, 姜涛, 尚春. 准噶尔盆地沙湾凹陷西斜坡上乌尔禾组油藏成藏模式新认识[J]. 新疆石油地质, 2024, 45(2): 151-162.
[13]	况昊, 周元东, 刘豪, 潘浪, 周润驰, 王钧民, 谭先锋. 沙湾凹陷砂砾岩沸石胶结物与碎屑颗粒粘结差异成因分析[J]. 新疆石油地质, 2024, 45(2): 163-171.
[14]	张德尧. 春风油田沙湾组稠油油藏倾斜油水界面成因[J]. 新疆石油地质, 2024, 45(2): 205-212.
[15]	宋海强, 刘慧卿, 王敬, 斯尚华, 杨潇. 鄂尔多斯盆地东南部长7段页岩油气富集主控因素[J]. 新疆石油地质, 2024, 45(1): 27-34.