庆城油田长7段页岩油藏长水平井轨迹调整技术

doi:10.7657/XJPG20250314

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

庆城油田长7段页岩储集层为泥页岩夹多期薄层粉—细砂岩组合，长水平井轨迹优化调整难度大，继而影响油田开发效果。对长水平井轨迹调整成熟的井震结合分频属性融合技术、地震构造约束精细三维地质建模、轨迹与地层匹配法和曲线移位法进行阐述，其调整成功率分别为87.9%、88.3%、89.8%和92.5%。进一步对3种技术的适用范围、技术优势及局限性进行评价，根据评价结果对复杂疑难井提出联合应用综合分析方法。对华池区中部268口水平井根据11项参数评价各类技术的应用效果，在传统录井导向技术基础上，增加1种井轨迹调整技术，油层钻遇率提升至79.4%，联合应用综合分析方法的油层钻遇率为84.2%。

关键词: 庆城油田, 延长组, 长7段, 页岩油, 长水平井, 轨迹调整, 旋转导向, 井震结合

Abstract:

The shale reservoirs of the Chang 7 member in the Qingcheng oilfield are characterized by the combination of mud shale and multi-stage thin layers of fine to silty sandstone, posing significant challenges for optimizing and adjusting long horizontal well trajectories, which in turn affects the overall oilfield development effect. Four mature trajectory adjustment techniques, i.e. logging-seismic combined frequency-division attribute fusion, fine 3D geological modeling constrained by seismic structure, trajectory-stratigraphy matching, and curve shifting, were described with the adjustment success rates of 87.9%, 88.3%, 89.8% and 92.5%, respectively. Furthermore, the 3 techniques were evaluated regarding application scope, advantage, and limitation. Based on the evaluation results, a comprehensive analysis method was proposed for complex and challenging wells. The performances of these techniques were evaluated with respect to 11 parameters for 268 horizontal wells in the central Huachi area of Qingcheng oilfield. It is found that the application of the conventional mud-logging geosteering technique in conjunction with one trajectory adjustment technique increases the reservoir encountered rate to 79.4%, while the comprehensive analysis method improves the reservoir encountered rate to 84.2%.

Key words: Qingcheng oilfield, Yanchang formation, Chang 7 member, shale oil, long horizontal well, trajectory adjustment, rotary steering, logging-seismic combination

中图分类号:

TE348

杨永兴, 朱冠臣, 王德刚, 朱家良, 任奕霖, 王博. 庆城油田长7段页岩油藏长水平井轨迹调整技术[J]. 新疆石油地质, 2025, 46(3): 367-374.

YANG Yongxing, ZHU Guanchen, WANG Degang, ZHU Jialiang, REN Yilin, WANG Bo. Trajectory Adjustment Technology for Long Horizontal Wells in Chang 7 Shale Oil Reservoirs, Qingcheng Oilfield[J]. Xinjiang Petroleum Geology, 2025, 46(3): 367-374.

图/表 9

图1

图2

图3

图4

图5

表1

图6

图7

表2

参考文献 30

[1]	付锁堂, 付金华, 牛小兵, 等. 庆城油田成藏条件及勘探开发关键技术[J]. 石油学报, 2020, 41(7):777-795. doi: 10.7623/syxb202007001
	FU Suotang, FU Jinhua, NIU Xiaobing, et al. Accumulation conditions and key exploration and development technologies in Qingcheng oilfield[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2020, 41(7):777-795. doi: 10.7623/syxb202007001
[2]	赵振峰, 李楷, 赵鹏云, 等. 鄂尔多斯盆地页岩油体积压裂技术实践与发展建议[J]. 石油钻探技术, 2021, 49(4):85-91.
	ZHAO Zhenfeng, LI Kai, ZHAO Pengyun, et al. Practice and development suggestions for volumetric fracturing technology for shale oil in the Ordos Basin[J]. Petroleum Drilling Techniques, 2021, 49(4):85-91.
[3]	李国欣, 吴志宇, 李桢, 等. 陆相源内非常规石油甜点优选与水平井立体开发技术实践:以鄂尔多斯盆地延长组7段为例[J]. 石油学报, 2021, 42(6):736-750. doi: 10.7623/syxb202106004
	LI Guoxin, WU Zhiyu, LI Zhen, et al. Optimal selection of unconventional petroleum sweet spots inside continental source kitchens and actual application of three-dimensional development technology in horizontal wells:A case study of the member 7 of Yanchang formation in Ordos Basin[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2021, 42(6):736-750. doi: 10.7623/syxb202106004
[4]	何永宏, 李桢, 樊建明, 等. 鄂尔多斯盆地页岩油开发井网优化技术及实践:以庆城油田为例[J]. 石油学报, 2024, 45(4):683-695. doi: 10.7623/syxb202404006
	HE Yonghong, LI Zhen, FAN Jianming, et al. Optimization technique of development well pattern of shale oil in Ordos Basin and its application:A case study of Qingcheng oilfield[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2024, 45(4):683-695. doi: 10.7623/syxb202404006
[5]	许冬进, 廖锐全, 石善志, 等. 致密油水平井体积压裂工厂化作业模式研究[J]. 特种油气藏, 2014, 21(3):1-6.
	XU Dongjin, LIAO Ruiquan, SHI Shanzhi, et al. Research on factory-like volumetric fracturing in horizontal wells for tight oil[J]. Special Oil & Gas Reservoirs, 2014, 21(3):1-6.
[6]	李国欣, 朱如凯. 中国石油非常规油气发展现状、挑战与关注问题[J]. 中国石油勘探, 2020, 25(2):1-13. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-7703.2020.02.001
	LI Guoxin. ZHU Rukai. Progress,challenges and key issues of unconventional oil and gas development of CNPC[J]. China Petroleum Exploration, 2020, 25(2):1-13. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-7703.2020.02.001
[7]	崔龙涛, 郝帅, 王春平, 等. 鄂尔多斯盆地镇原北部三叠系延长组长7—长6油层组古地貌与砂体分布特征[J]. 古地理学报, 2015, 17(6):805-812. doi: 10.7605/gdlxb.2015.06.066
	CUI Longtao, HAO Shuai, WANG Chunping, et al. Palaeogeomorphology reconstruction and sandbody distribution of the Chang 7-6 intervals of Triassic Yanchang formation in northern Zhenyuan area,Ordos Basin[J]. Journal of Palaeogeography, 2015, 17(6):805-812. doi: 10.7605/gdlxb.2015.06.066
[8]	李相博, 刘化清, 张忠义, 等. 深水块状砂岩碎屑流成因的直接证据:“泥包砾”结构:以鄂尔多斯盆地上三叠统延长组研究为例[J]. 沉积学报, 2014, 32(4):611-621.
	LI Xiangbo, LIU Huaqing, ZHANG Zhongyi, et al. “Argillaceous parcel” structure:A direct evidence of debris flow origin of deep-water massive sandstone of Yanchang formation,Upper Triassic,the Ordos Basin[J]. Acta Sedimentologica Sinica, 2014, 32(4):611-621.
[9]	孙宁亮, 钟建华, 刘绍光, 等. 鄂尔多斯盆地南部延长组重力流致密储层成岩作用及物性演化[J]. 地球科学, 2017, 42(10):1802-1815.
	SUN Ningliang, ZHONG Jianhua, LIU Shaoguang, et al. Diagenesis and physical property evolution of gravity flow tight reservoir of Yanchang formation in southern Ordos Basin[J]. Earth Science, 2017, 42(10):1802-1815.
[10]	杨华, 李士祥, 刘显阳. 鄂尔多斯盆地致密油、页岩油特征及资源潜力[J]. 石油学报, 2013, 34(1):1-11.
	YANG Hua, LI Shixiang, LIU Xianyang. Characteristics and resource prospects of tight oil and shale oil in Ordos Basin[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2013, 34(1):1-11. doi: 10.7623/syxb201301001
[11]	张文正, 杨华, 杨伟伟, 等. 鄂尔多斯盆地延长组长7 湖相页岩油地质特征评价[J]. 地球化学, 2015, 44(5):505-515.
	ZHANG Wenzheng, YANG Hua, YANG Weiwei, et al. Assessment of geological characteristics of lacustrine shale oil reservoir in Chang 7 member of Yanchang formation,Ordos Basin[J]. Geochimica, 2015, 44(5):505-515.
[12]	杨智, 付金华, 郭秋麟, 等. 鄂尔多斯盆地三叠系延长组陆相致密油发现、特征及潜力[J]. 中国石油勘探, 2017, 22(6):9-15. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-7703.2017.06.002
	YANG Zhi, FU Jinhua, GUO Qiulin, et al. Discovery,characteristics and resource potential of continental tight oil in Triassic Yanchang formation,Ordos Basin[J]. China Petroleum Exploration, 2017, 22(6):9-15.
[13]	付锁堂, 姚泾利, 李士祥, 等. 鄂尔多斯盆地中生界延长组陆相页岩油富集特征与资源潜力[J]. 石油实验地质, 2020, 42(5):698-710.
	FU Suotang, YAO Jingli, LI Shixiang, et al. Enrichment characteristics and resource potential of continental shale oil in Mesozoic Yanchang formation,Ordos Basin[J]. Petroleum Geology & Experiment, 2020, 42(5):698-710.
[14]	宋海强, 刘慧卿, 王敬, 等. 鄂尔多斯盆地东南部长7段页岩油气富集主控因素[J]. 新疆石油地质, 2024, 45(1):27-33.
	SONG Haiqiang, LIU Huiqing, WANG Jing, et al. Main controlling factors of shale oil and gas enrichment in Chang 7 member,southeastern Ordos Basin[J]. Xinjiang Petroleum Geology, 2024, 45(1):27-33.
[15]	何发岐, 朱建辉, 齐荣, 等. 基于天文周期等时格架预测细粒沉积岩相展布:以鄂尔多斯盆地富县地区三叠系长7段为例[J]. 石油实验地质, 2024, 46(5):927-940.
	HE Faqi, ZHU Jianhui, QI Rong, et al. Prediction of fine-grained sedimentary lithofacies distribution based on astronomical cycle isochronous lattice:A case study of Triassic Chang 7 member of Fuxian area,Ordos Basin[J]. Petroleum Geology & Experiment, 2024, 46(5):927-940.
[16]	解馨慧, 邓虎成, 胡蓝霄, 等. 湖相细粒沉积岩颗粒微观力学特征及类型划分:以鄂尔多斯盆地上三叠统延长组7段页岩为例[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2024, 45(4):1079-1088.
	XIE Xinhui, DENG Hucheng, HU Lanxiao, et al. Micromechanical characteristics and classification of the grains of lacustrine fine-grained sedimentary rocks:A case study of shales in the 7th member of the Upper Triassic Yanchang formation,Ordos Basin[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2024, 45(4):1079-1088.
[17]	郭惠, 赵红格, 李莹, 等. 鄂尔多斯盆地西部古峰庄地区三叠系延长组长7—长9段裂缝特征及油气意义[J]. 石油实验地质, 2023, 45(1):109-121.
	GUO Hui, ZHAO Hongge, LI Ying, et al. Fracture characteristics and hydrocarbon significance in the Chang 7 to Chang 9 members of Triassic Yanchang formation of Gufengzhuang area,western Ordos Basin[J]. Petroleum Geology & Experiment, 2023, 45(1):109-121.
[18]	卢皓, 张皎生, 李超, 等. 鄂尔多斯盆地西南部三叠系延长组7段页岩层系层理缝发育特征与主控因素[J]. 石油实验地质, 2024, 46(4):698-709.
	LU Hao, ZHANG Jiaosheng, LI Chao, et al. Development characteristics and main controlling factors of bedding-parallel lamellated fractures in shale in 7th member of Triassic Yanchang formation,southwestern Ordos Basin[J]. Petroleum Geology & Experiment, 2024, 46(4):698-709.
[19]	王梓毅, 付金华, 刘显阳, 等. 鄂尔多斯盆地上三叠统延长组7段埋藏期热液活动对页岩油储层的影响[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2023, 44(4):899-909.
	WANG Ziyi, FU Jinhua, LIU Xianyang, et al. The influence of hydrothermal activities on shale oil reservoirs during the burial period of the Upper Triassic Chang 7 member,Ordos Basin[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2023, 44(4):899-909.
[20]	李倩文, 马晓潇, 高波, 等. 美国重点页岩油区勘探开发进展及启示[J]. 新疆石油地质, 2021, 42(5):630-640.
	LI Qianwen, MA Xiaoxiao, GAO Bo, et al. Progress and enlightenment of exploration and development of major shale oil zones in the USA[J]. Xinjiang Petroleum Geology, 2021, 42(5):630-640.
[21]	卫嘉鑫, 张妍, 尚教辉, 等. 页岩油开发初期产能控制因素分析:以长庆油田里151区为例[J]. 油气藏评价与开发, 2021, 11(4):550-558.
	WEI Jiaxin, ZHANG Yan, SHANG Jiaohui, et al. Principal factor analysis on initial productivity in shale oil development:A case study of Block Li-151 in Changqing oilfield[J]. Petroleum Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2021, 11(4):550-558.
[22]	薛婷, 黄天镜, 成良丙, 等. 鄂尔多斯盆地庆城油田页岩油水平井产能主控因素及开发对策优化[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2021, 32(12):1880-1888. doi: 10.11764/j.issn.1672-1926.2021.11.002
	XUE Ting, HUANG Tianjing, CHENG Liangbing, et al. Dominating factors on shale oil horizontal well productivity and development strategies optimization in Qingcheng oilfield,Ordos Basin[J]. Natural Gas Geoscience, 2021, 32(12):1880-1888. doi: 10.11764/j.issn.1672-1926.2021.11.002
[23]	覃建华, 李映艳, 杜戈峰, 等. 基于核磁共振测井的页岩油产能分析及甜点评价[J]. 新疆石油地质, 2024, 45(3):317-324.
	QIN Jianhua, LI Yingyan, DU Gefeng, et al. NMR logging-based productivity analysis and sweet spot evaluation for shale oil[J]. Xinjiang Petroleum Geology, 2024, 45(3):317-324.
[24]	曾义金, 王敏生, 光新军, 等. 中国石化智能钻井技术进展与展望[J]. 石油钻探技术, 2024, 52(5):1-8.
	ZENG Yijin, WANG Minsheng, GUANG Xinjun, et al. Progress and prospects of Sinopec’s intelligent drilling technologies[J]. Petroleum Drilling Techniques, 2024, 52(5):1-8.
[25]	杨永兴, 杨军, 孙钿翔, 等. 纵向强非均质性储层水平井提高油层钻遇率技术[J]. 科学技术与工程, 2017, 17(30):202-206.
	YANG Yongxing, YANG Jun, SUN Dianxiang, et al. Technology of increasing oil drilling rate in horizontal well with vertical strong heterogeneity reservoir[J]. Science Technology and Engineering, 2017, 17(30):202-206.
[26]	OLIVIER G. Using an E&P digital twin in well construction[EB/OL]. (2022-01-07) [2024-08-12]. https://www.halliburton.com/en/software/decisionspace-365-enterprise/decisionspace-365-well-construction .
[27]	LAI S W, NG J, EDDY A, et al. Large-scale deployment of a closed-loop drilling optimization system:Implementation and field results[R]. SPE 199601, 2020.
[28]	梁卫卫, 党海龙, 崔鹏兴, 等. 三维地质建模技术在致密砂岩油藏水平井开发中的应用:以鄂尔多斯盆地S区块为[J]. 新疆石油地质, 2020, 41(5):616-620.
	LIANG Weiwei, DANG Hailong, CUI Pengxing, et al. Application of 3D geological modeling in horizontal well development of tight sandstone oil reservoirs:A case study of Block S in Ordos Basin[J]. Xinjiang Petroleum Geology, 2020, 41(5):616-620.
[29]	周东华, 蔡苗, 高明, 等. 一种旋转导向钻井工具未知全驱系统的智能容错控制方法:CN202410034504.9[P]. 2024-01-10.
	ZHOU Donghua, CAI Miao, GAO Ming, et al. An intelligent fault-tolerant control method for the unknown full drive system of a rotary steering drilling tool:CN202410034504.9[P]. 2024-01-10.
[30]	李晓强, 杨彬, 杨志华. 水平段地质导向技术分析[J]. 测井技术, 2024, 48(5):691-699.
	LI Xiaoqiang, YANG Bin, YANG Zhihua. Technical analysis of horizontal section geosteering[J]. Well Logging Technology, 2024, 48(5):691-699.

序号	自然伽马特征	成像形态变化特征	地质认识	井斜角与地层倾角的关系	调整措施
1	方位上自然伽马先上升，方位下自然伽马下降	先上切，再下切	上切出层，下切回层	井斜角>地层倾角	降斜后回层
2	方位下自然伽马先上升，方位上自然伽马下降	先下切，再上切	下切出层，上切回层	井斜角<地层倾角	增斜后回层
3	方位上自然伽马先上升，方位下自然伽马紧跟上升	持续上切	上穿隔夹层	井斜角>地层倾角	上穿层一定厚度后降斜
4	方位下自然伽马先上升，方位上自然伽马紧跟上升	持续下切	下穿隔夹层	井斜角<地层倾角	下穿层一定厚度后增斜
5	局部方位上自然伽马先上升后下降，方位下自然伽马基本不变	弱上切	上蹭局部夹层	井斜角≈地层倾角	缓降或稳斜
6	局部方位下自然伽马先上升后下降，方位上自然伽马基本不变	弱下切	下蹭局部夹层	井斜角≈地层倾角	缓增或稳斜

调整技术	井数/ 口	油层厚度/ m	隔夹层数/ 个	设计水平段长度/m	实钻水平段长度/m	水平段轨迹调整频次/ （次·口^-1）	轨迹调整决策时间/ （h·口^-1）	油层钻遇率/ %	Ⅰ类油层钻遇率/%	油层平均自然伽马/ API	录井油层气测含量/%	井均折合百米水平段可压裂段数	井均折合百米水平段可压裂簇数	压裂一次起压率/%	压裂液压裂砂无效利用率/%
传统录井导向技术	122	8.7	3.8	1 500	1 402	18	34.2	72.3	51.9	106.5	12.5	1.2	6.2	97.2	2.4
传统录井导向技术结合1种调整技术	86	8.2	4.1	1 500	1 452	12	15.6	79.4	60.1	98.2	14.6	1.3	6.4	98.1	1.8
联合应用综合分析方法	60	7.2	4.0	1 500	1 489	9	13.5	84.2	66.4	84.5	19.5	1.5	6.6	99.2	0.8