从闷井压力反演页岩油水平井压裂裂缝参数和地层压力

doi:10.7657/XJPG20220517

新疆石油地质 ›› 2022, Vol. 43 ›› Issue (5): 624-629.doi: 10.7657/XJPG20220517

• 应用技术 • 上一篇

从闷井压力反演页岩油水平井压裂裂缝参数和地层压力

王飞¹, 吴宝成², 廖凯³, 石善志², 张士诚¹, 李建民², 索杰林¹

1.中国石油大学（北京）石油工程学院,北京 102249
2.中国石油新疆油田分公司工程技术研究院,新疆克拉玛依 834000
3.中国石油大学（北京）克拉玛依校区石油学院,新疆克拉玛依 834000

收稿日期:2021-10-13 修回日期:2022-02-15 出版日期:2022-10-01 发布日期:2022-09-22
通讯作者: 廖凯
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金(51974332);新疆维吾尔自治区自然科学基金(2022D01B79)

Inversion of Fracture Parameters and Formation Pressure for Fractured Horizontal Wells in Shale Oil Reservoir Based on Soaking Pressure

WANG Fei¹, WU Baocheng², LIAO Kai³, SHI Shanzhi², ZHANG Shicheng¹, LI Jianmin², SUO Jielin¹

1. School of Petroleum Engineering, China University of Petroleum, Beijing 102249, China
2. Research Institute of Engineering Technology, Xinjiang Oilfield Company, PetroChina, Karamay, Xinjiang 834000, China
3. School of Petroleum Engineering, Karamay Campus, China University of Petroleum (Beijing), Karamay, Xinjiang 834000, China

Received:2021-10-13 Revised:2022-02-15 Online:2022-10-01 Published:2022-09-22
Contact: LIAO Kai

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

页岩油压裂水平井投产前普遍先闷井,为快速评价体积压裂效果,提出基于页岩油藏闷井压力数据的压后评估方法。通过闷井数值模拟,表征压裂水平井缝网改造区域的压力扩散与流体运移规律,并建立闭合后线性流计算模型和裂缝储集控制数学模型,形成反演裂缝参数与地层压力的计算方法。结果表明,压裂停泵后改造区域依次经历井筒末段裂缝控制、全井段裂缝控制以及储集层基质控制下的9个流动阶段,其压降导数在双对数坐标下为不同斜率的多个直线段;应用于吉木萨尔凹陷4口典型页岩油水平井,证明了闷井压力数据能用于裂缝参数和地层压力反演,也验证了提出方法的适用性,可供评价压裂作业效果和优化平台井距借鉴。

关键词: 吉木萨尔凹陷, 页岩油, 水平井, 体积压裂, 闷井, 压降, 地层压力, 数值模拟

Abstract:

A fractured horizontal well in shale oil reservoir should be soaked before it is put into production. In order to quickly evaluate the effect of volume fracturing, a post-frac evaluation method based on the data of soaking pressure of shale oil reservoirs was proposed. Through numerical simulation of well soaking, the pressure diffusion and fluid migration in the stimulation area controlled by the fractured horizontal well were characterized, and a post-closure linear flow calculation model and a fracture storage control calculation model were established. Then a calculation method for inverting fracture parameters and formation pressure was formed. The results show that after pump is stopped, the stimulation area goes through 9 flow stages such as flows controlled by fractures in end section of wellbore, by fractures in the whole wellbore and by reservoir matrix, and the pressure drop derivatives appear as multiple straight-line segments with different slopes in log-log coordinates. This method has been applied to four typical shale oil horizontal wells in Jimsar sag, which proves that the data of soaking pressure can be used for the inversion of fracture parameters and formation pressure, and also verifies the applicability of the proposed method. The study results provide a reference for evaluating fracturing effect and optimizing well spacing.

Key words: Jimsar sag, shale oil, horizontal well, volume fracturing, well soaking, pressure drop, formation pressure, numerical simulation

中图分类号:

TE357

王飞, 吴宝成, 廖凯, 石善志, 张士诚, 李建民, 索杰林. 从闷井压力反演页岩油水平井压裂裂缝参数和地层压力[J]. 新疆石油地质, 2022, 43(5): 624-629.

WANG Fei, WU Baocheng, LIAO Kai, SHI Shanzhi, ZHANG Shicheng, LI Jianmin, SUO Jielin. Inversion of Fracture Parameters and Formation Pressure for Fractured Horizontal Wells in Shale Oil Reservoir Based on Soaking Pressure[J]. Xinjiang Petroleum Geology, 2022, 43(5): 624-629.

图/表 5

参考文献 23

[1]	杨智, 侯连华, 林森虎, 等. 吉木萨尔凹陷芦草沟组致密油、页岩油地质特征与勘探潜力[J]. 中国石油勘探, 2018, 23(4):76-85. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-7703.2018.04.009
	YANG Zhi, HOU Lianhua, LIN Senhu, et al. Geological characteristics and exploration potential of tight oil and shale oil in Lucaogou formation in Jimusar sag[J]. China Petroleum Exploration, 2018, 23(4):76-85.
[2]	孟庆民, 张士诚, 王莉, 等. 数据挖掘技术在气田压裂效果评价中的应用[J]. 中国石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2008, 32(5):165-169.
	MENG Qingmin, ZHANG Shicheng, WANG Li, et al. Application of data mining to postfracture response evaluation in gas field[J]. Journal of China University of Petroleum(Natural Science Edition), 2008, 32(5):165-169.
[3]	SONG Bo, EHLIG C. Rate-normalized pressure analysis for determination of shale gas well performance[R]. SPE 144031, 2011.
[4]	SOLIMAN M Y. Analysis of buildup tests with short producing time[J]. SPE Formation Evaluation, 1986, 1(4):363-371. doi: 10.2118/11083-PA
[5]	SOLIMAN M Y, AZARI M, ANSAH J, et al. Review and application of short-term pressure transient testing of wells[R]. SPE 93560, 2005.
[6]	BOURDET D, AYOUB J A, PIRARD Y M. Use of pressure derivative in well-test interpretation[J]. SPE Formation Evaluation, 1989, 4(2):293-302. doi: 10.2118/12777-PA
[7]	MOHAMED I M, NASRALLA R A, SAYAD M A, et al. Evaluation of after-closure analysis techniques for tight and shale gas formations[R]. SPE 140136, 2011.
[8]	BACHMAN R C, WALTERS D A, HAWKES R A, et al. Reappraisal of the G time concept in mini-frac analysis[R]. SPE 160169, 2012.
[9]	王飞, 张士诚, 蔡久杰. 一种简便的测试压裂压力递减分析方法[J]. 西南石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2014, 36(3):115-120.
	WANG Fei, ZHANG Shicheng, CAI Jiujie. Fast pressure decline analysis of fracture calibration tests[J]. Journal of Southwest Petroleum University(Science & Technology Edition), 2014, 36(3):115-120.
[10]	ZANGANEH B, CLARKSON C R, JONES J R. Reinterpretation of flow patterns during DFITs based on dynamic fracture geometry,leakoff and afterflow[R]. SPE 189840, 2018.
[11]	WANG Fei, LI Baoman, CHEN Qiaoyun, et al. Simulation of proppant distribution in hydraulically fractured shale network during shut-in periods[J]. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 2019, 178:467-474. doi: 10.1016/j.petrol.2019.03.046
[12]	曹元婷, 潘晓慧, 李菁, 等. 关于吉木萨尔凹陷页岩油的思考[J]. 新疆石油地质, 2020, 41(5):622-630.
	CAO Yuanting, PAN Xiaohui, LI Jing, et al. Discussion on shale oil in Jimsar sag,Junggar basin[J]. Xinjiang Petroleum Geology, 2020, 41(5):622-630.
[13]	苏玉亮, 陈征, 唐梅荣, 等. 致密储层不同驱替方式下超临界CO₂蓄能返排效果实验研究[J]. 油气地质与采收率, 2020, 27(5):79-85.
	SU Yuliang, CHEN Zheng, TANG Meirong, et al. Experimental study of supercritical CO₂ storage and flowback under different displacement methods in tight reservoirs[J]. Petroleum Geology and Recovery Efficiency, 2020, 27(5):79-85.
[14]	马明伟, 祝健, 李嘉成, 等. 吉木萨尔凹陷芦草沟组页岩油储集层渗吸规律[J]. 新疆石油地质, 2021, 42(6):702-708.
	MA Mingwei, ZHU Jian, LI Jiacheng, et al. Imbibition law of shale oil reservoirs in the Lucaogou formation in Jimsar sag[J]. Xinjiang Petroleum Geology, 2021, 42(6):702-708.
[15]	王飞, 阮颖琪, 陈巧韵, 等. 考虑压裂液渗吸换油效应的压裂焖井压降模型[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2021, 48(6):1 250-1 257.
	WANG Fei, RUAN Yingqi, CHEN Qiaoyun, et al. A pressure drop model of post-fracturing shut-in considering the effect of fracturing-fluid imbibition and oil replacement[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2021, 48(6):1 250-1 257.
[16]	LIAO Kai, ZHANG Shicheng, MA Xinfang, et al. Numerical investigation of fracture compressibility and uncertainty on water-loss and production performance in tight oil reservoirs[J]. Energies, 2019, 12(7):1 189. doi: 10.3390/en12071189
[17]	WANG Fei, CHEN Qiaoyun, ZHANG Jingchen, et al. Numerical investigation of oil-water exchange behaviors in shale during post-fracturing soaking periods[J]. Frontiers in Earth Science, 2021, 9:1-10.
[18]	WANG Hanyi, ELLIOTT B, SHARMA M. Pressure decline analysis in fractured horizontal wells:comparison between diagnostic fracture injection test,flowback,and main stage falloff[J]. SPE Drilling & Completion, 2021, 36(3):717-729.
[19]	ABBASI M A, EZULIKE D O, DEHGHANPOUR H, et al. A comparative study of flowback rate and pressure transient behavior in multifractured horizontal wells completed in tight gas and oil reservoirs[J]. Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering, 2014, 17:82-93. doi: 10.1016/j.jngse.2013.12.007
[20]	吴宝成, 李建民, 邬元月, 等. 准噶尔盆地吉木萨尔凹陷芦草沟组页岩油上甜点地质工程一体化开发实践[J]. 中国石油勘探, 2019, 24(5):679-690. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-7703.2019.05.014
	WU Baocheng, LI Jianmin, WU Yuanyue, et al. Development practices of geology-engineering integration on upper sweet spots of Lucaogou formation shale oil in Jimsar sag,Junggar basin[J]. China Petroleum Exploration, 2019, 24(5):679-690. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-7703.2019.05.014
[21]	王小军, 杨智峰, 郭旭光, 等. 准噶尔盆地吉木萨尔凹陷页岩油勘探实践与展望[J]. 新疆石油地质, 2019, 40(4):402-413.
	WANG Xiaojun, YANG Zhifeng, GUO Xuguang, et al. Practices and prospects of shale oil exploration in Jimsar sag of Junggar basin[J]. Xinjiang Petroleum Geology, 2019, 40(4):402-413.
[22]	冯其红, 李东杰, 时贤, 等. 基于扩展有限元的水平井改进拉链式压裂数值模拟[J]. 中国石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2019, 43(2):105-112.
	FENG Qihong, LI Dongjie, SHI Xian, et al. Numerical simulation of modified zipper-type hydraulic fracture propagation in horizontal wells based on extended finite element method[J]. Journal of China University of Petroleum(Natural Science Edition), 2019, 43(2):105-112.
[23]	FU Yingkun, DEHGHANPOUR H, EZULIKE D, et al. Estimating effective fracture pore volume from flowback data and evaluating its relationship to design parameters of multistage-fracture completion[J]. SPE Production & Operations, 2017, 32(4):423-439.

从闷井压力反演页岩油水平井压裂裂缝参数和地层压力

Inversion of Fracture Parameters and Formation Pressure for Fractured Horizontal Wells in Shale Oil Reservoir Based on Soaking Pressure

RichHTML

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 5

参考文献 23

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	顾浩, 康志江, 尚根华, 张冬丽, 李红凯, 黄孝特. 超深层断控缝洞型油藏油井合理产能优化方法及应用[J]. 新疆石油地质, 2023, 44(1): 64-69.
[2]	郭海平, 吴承美, 张金风, 徐田录, 肖佃师, 郭雪燚. 吉木萨尔凹陷芦草沟组混积型页岩油可动性实验[J]. 新疆石油地质, 2023, 44(1): 76-83.
[3]	邱浩, 文敏, 吴怡, 幸雪松, 马楠, 李占东, 郭天姿. 南海油田惠州潜山裂缝性凝析油气藏控水实验[J]. 新疆石油地质, 2023, 44(1): 84-92.
[4]	钱门辉, 王绪龙, 黎茂稳, 李志明, 冷筠莹, 孙中良. 玛页1井风城组页岩含油性与烃类赋存状态[J]. 新疆石油地质, 2022, 43(6): 693-703.
[5]	邹阳, 戚艳平, 宋栋, 陈文顺, 韦盼云. 玛页1井风城组页岩油藏地质特征及甜点评价[J]. 新疆石油地质, 2022, 43(6): 714-723.
[6]	刘财广, 季瑞雪, 王伟, 张融. 玛湖凹陷风城组页岩油产量影响因素及甜点评价[J]. 新疆石油地质, 2022, 43(6): 733-742.
[7]	余佩蓉, 郑国庆, 孙福泰, 王振林. 玛湖凹陷风城组页岩油藏水平井压裂裂缝扩展模拟[J]. 新疆石油地质, 2022, 43(6): 750-756.
[8]	于江龙, 陈刚, 吴俊军, 李维, 杨森, 唐廷明. 玛湖凹陷风城组页岩油地质工程甜点地震预测方法及应用[J]. 新疆石油地质, 2022, 43(6): 757-766.
[9]	宋俊强, 李晓山, 王硕, 顾开放, 潘虹, 王鑫. 致密油藏压裂水平井产量预测[J]. 新疆石油地质, 2022, 43(5): 580-586.
[10]	雷泽萱, 辛显康, 喻高明, 王立. 基于数值模拟的油藏生产动态优化算法[J]. 新疆石油地质, 2022, 43(5): 612-616.
[11]	郭小哲, 赵健, 高旺来, 蒲雅男, 李成格尔, 高能. 稠油油藏多轮次减氧空气吞吐后复合注气增油机理[J]. 新疆石油地质, 2022, 43(4): 450-455.
[12]	萧汉敏, 罗永成, 赵新礼, 张海琴, 刘学伟. 水平井CO₂缝间驱替产能影响因素[J]. 新疆石油地质, 2022, 43(4): 479-483.
[13]	周晋冲, 张彬, 雷征东, 邵晓岩, 关云, 曹仁义. 低渗透油藏不稳定注水岩心实验及增油机理[J]. 新疆石油地质, 2022, 43(4): 491-495.
[14]	池云刚, 唐致霞, 魏静, 周惠泽, 张文辉. 北布扎奇油田VI区的水流优势通道[J]. 新疆石油地质, 2022, 43(4): 496-504.
[15]	万晓龙, 张原立, 樊建明, 李桢, 张超. 鄂尔多斯盆地长7页岩油藏水平井生产制度[J]. 新疆石油地质, 2022, 43(3): 329-334.