致密气藏多层砂体合采井产量递减分析方法

doi:10.7657/XJPG20240311

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

致密气藏主力产层多为多层叠置河道砂体，合采时普遍存在各产层贡献不明及砂体动用边界不清的问题。首先，考虑各层河道砂体形态特征和边界尺寸差异，根据等效渗流体积原则，建立了致密气藏多层河道砂体合采井生产模型。其次，基于现代产量递减分析理论，形成了致密气藏多层河道砂体的边界确定方法和合采井产量递减分析图版。最后，讨论不同河道砂体边界距离、砂体数量和砂体位置下的产量递减特征，明确了多层河道砂体对产量递减的影响。研究表明：致密气藏多层河道砂体合采井产量具有5个递减阶段，不稳定流中期阶段可诊断各层砂体边界距离是否相等；河道砂体范围越小，宽砂体数量越少，宽砂体占比越小，储集层稳产能力越差，不稳定流早期阶段和不稳定流中期阶段易出现产量递减速率增大现象。建立的产量递减分析方法可为产层动用程度评价和增产措施制定提供依据。

关键词: 致密气藏, 产量递减分析, 河道砂体, 多层合采, 砂体边界, 渗流模型, 参数反演

Abstract:

Main pay zones of tight gas reservoirs are usually multiple layers of stacked channel sandbodies. Commingled production of these layers is commonly challenged by unclear contribution from each layer and undefined boundaries of sandbodies. Considering the morphological characteristics and different boundary sizes of channel sandbodies in the layers, and according to the principle of equivalent flow volume, a model of multi-layer commingled production well in tight gas reservoir was established. Then, based on the theory of modern production decline analysis, a method for determining the boundaries of channel sandbodies in tight gas reservoirs was proposed, and the production decline analysis charts for multi-layer commingled production wells were plotted. Finally, the production decline was discussed by boundary size, amount, and position of channel sandbodies, and the impacts of multi-layer channel sandbodies on production decline were clarified. The study shows that the production deline of multi-layer commingled production wells in tight gas reservoirs exhibits five stages. In the middle unsteady flow stage, it is possible to diagnose whether the boundary sizes of the sandbodies in each layer are equal. The smaller the range of channel sandbodies, the fewer the wide sandbodies, the smaller the proportion of wide sandbody, the poorer the stable productivity of the reservoir, and the more likely the increase in production decline rate occurs in the early and middle unsteady flow stages. The established method of production decline analysis provides a basis for evaluating the producing degree of each layer and determining reservoir stimulation treatments.

Key words: tight gas reservoir, production decline analysis, channel sandbody, multi-layer commingled production, sandbody boundary, flow model, parameter inversion

中图分类号:

TE328

柳洁, 魏克颖, 李宁, 杨映洲, 郝军慧, 李林清, 史文洋. 致密气藏多层砂体合采井产量递减分析方法[J]. 新疆石油地质, 2024, 45(3): 340-345.

LIU Jie, WEI Keying, LI Ning, YANG Yingzhou, HAO Junhui, LI Linqing, SHI Wenyang. Production Decline Analysis for Multi-Layer Commingled Production Wells in Tight Gas Reservoirs[J]. Xinjiang Petroleum Geology, 2024, 45(3): 340-345.

图/表 6

图1

图2

图3

图4

图5

表1

参考文献 25

[1]	余浩杰, 王振嘉, 李进步, 等. 鄂尔多斯盆地长庆气区复杂致密砂岩气藏开发关键技术进展及攻关方向[J]. 石油学报, 2023, 44(4):698-712. doi: 10.7623/syxb202304011
	YU Haojie, WANG Zhenjia, LI Jinbu, et al. Key technological progress and breakthrough direction for the development of complex tight gas reservoirs in Changqing gas field,Ordos basin[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2023, 44(4):698-712. doi: 10.7623/syxb202304011
[2]	王继平, 张城玮, 李建阳, 等. 苏里格气田致密砂岩气藏开发认识与稳产建议[J]. 天然气工业, 2021, 41(2):100-110.
	WANG Jiping, ZHANG Chengwei, LI Jianyang, et al. Tight sandstone gas reservoirs in the Sulige gas field:Development understandings and stable-production proposals[J]. Natural Gas Industry, 2021, 41(2):100-110.
[3]	卢志远, 何治亮, 马世忠, 等. 高能辫状河沉积特征及砂体分布:以苏东X密井网区为例[J]. 石油学报, 2021, 42(8):1003-1014. doi: 10.7623/syxb202108003
	LU Zhiyuan, HE Zhiliang, MA Shizhong, et al. Characteristics and sand distribution of high-energy braided river deposits:A case study of X tight well area in eastern Sulige region[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2021, 42(8):1003-1014. doi: 10.7623/syxb202108003
[4]	崔明明, 李进步, 王宗秀, 等. 辫状河三角洲前缘致密砂岩储层特征及优质储层控制因素:以苏里格气田西南部石盒子组8段为例[J]. 石油学报, 2019, 40(3):279-294. doi: 10.7623/syxb201903003
	CUI Mingming, LI Jinbu, WANG Zongxiu, et al. Characteristics of tight sand reservoir and controlling factors of high-quality reservoir at braided delta front:A case study from Member 8 of Shihezi formation in southwestern Sulige gas field[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2019, 40(3):279-294. doi: 10.7623/syxb201903003
[5]	严谨, 程时清, 郑荣臣, 等. 确定压裂裂缝部分闭合的现代产量递减分析方法及应用[J]. 石油钻采工艺, 2018, 40(6):787-793.
	YAN Jin, CHENG Shiqing, ZHENG Rongchen, et al. Development and application of the modern production decline analysis method in consideration of partial closure of hydraulic fracture[J]. Oil Drilling & Production Technology, 2018, 40(6):787-793.
[6]	张郁哲, 程时清, 史文洋, 等. 多层合采井产量劈分方法及在大牛地气田的应用[J]. 石油钻采工艺, 2019, 41(5):624-629.
	ZHANG Yuzhe, CHENG Shiqing, SHI Wenyang, et al. Commingled producing well production split method and its application in Daniudi gasfield[J]. Oil Drilling & Production Technology, 2019, 41(5):624-629.
[7]	高敏, 段蕾, 史文洋, 等. 多层非均匀径向复合储层压力动态特征[J]. 非常规油气, 2020, 7(6):41-48.
	GAO Min, DUAN Lei, SHI Wenyang, et al. Pressure dynamic feature of multi-layer non-uniform radial composite reservoir[J]. Unconventional Oil & Gas, 2020, 7(6):41-48.
[8]	孙贺东, 周芳德. 单层开采的圆形定压边界两层油藏压力动态分析[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2003, 30(6):92-94.
	SUN Hedong, ZHOU Fangde. Pressure transient analysis of two layers cross-flow reservoir perforated partially with constant pressure outer boundary[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2003, 30(6):92-94.
[9]	郑荣臣, 严谨, 张郁哲, 等. 多层压裂改造气井椭圆渗流压力动态特征[J]. 断块油气田, 2020, 27(2):207-212.
	ZHENG Rongchen, YAN Jin, ZHANG Yuzhe, et al. Pressure transient behavior of multi-layer fracturing gas wells with elliptical flow[J]. Fault-Block Oil & Gas Field, 2020, 27(2):207-212.
[10]	张利军, 朱国金, 王帅, 等. 河流相储集层砂体构型试井响应图版[J]. 新疆石油地质, 2018, 39(3):367-371.
	ZHANG Lijun, ZHU Guojin, WANG Shuai, et al. Well test response charts of sand body configuration in fluvial facies reservoirs[J]. Xinjiang Petroleum Geology, 2018, 39(3):367-371.
[11]	张锦锋, 吴磊磊, 史文洋, 等. 多层致密油气藏分层压裂井裂缝非均匀导流能力试井分析方法[J]. 中国石油勘探, 2023, 28(5):145-157. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-7703.2023.05.013
	ZHANG Jinfeng, WU Leilei, SHI Wenyang, et al. Well testing analysis method for non-uniform fracture conductivity of multi-layer tight oil and gas reservoirs in multi-layer fracturing well[J]. China Petroleum Exploration, 2023, 28(5):145-157. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-7703.2023.05.013
[12]	史文洋, 程时清, 孙兵, 等. 具有纵向非均匀复合半径的储层合采井压力响应特征[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2021, 32(4):481-491.
	SHI Wenyang, CHENG Shiqing, SUN Bing, et al. Pressure response behavior of vertical well in commingled reservoir with vertical non-uniform composite radii[J]. Natural Gas Geoscience, 2021, 32(4):481-491.
[13]	贾冉, 聂仁仕, 刘勇, 等. 缝洞型油藏斜井三孔双渗试井分析模型[J]. 新疆石油地质, 2022, 43(5):606-611.
	JIA Ran, NIE Renshi, LIU Yong, et al. Tri-porosity and dual-permeability well test analysis model for inclined wells in fractured-vuggy reservoirs[J]. Xinjiang Petroleum Geology, 2022, 43(5):606-611.
[14]	李治平. 变井筒效应下有越流双层合采油藏的压降曲线特征[J]. 新疆石油地质, 1992, 13(4):365-371.
	LI Zhiping. Characteristics of the draw-down curves from commingled production of dual zone reservoir with a crossing flow at variable borehole effects[J]. Xinjiang Petroleum Geology, 1992, 13(4):365-371.
[15]	何贤科, 娄敏, 蔡华, 等. 西湖凹陷C油田花港组浅水三角洲储集层构型[J]. 新疆石油地质, 2023, 44(5):517-527.
	HE Xianke, LOU Min, CAI Hua, et al. Architecture of shallow-water delta reservoir of Huagang formation in C oilfield,Xihu sag[J]. Xinjiang Petroleum Geology, 2023, 44(5):517-527.
[16]	吴泽民, 柯先启, 张攀, 等. 鄂尔多斯盆地姬塬地区长9段砂体构型[J]. 新疆石油地质, 2022, 43(3):294-309.
	WU Zemin, KE Xianqi, ZHANG Pan, et al. Sand body architecture of Chang 9 member in Jiyuan area,Ordos basin[J]. Xinjiang Petroleum Geology, 2022, 43(3):294-309.
[17]	樊晓伊, 薛国勤, 刘斌, 等. 准噶尔盆地春光油田稀井区曲流河储集层构型定量表征[J]. 新疆石油地质, 2020, 41(2):147-157.
	FAN Xiaoyi, XUE Guoqin, LIU Bin, et al. Quantitative characterization of reservoir architecture of meandering-river deposits in sparse well blocks:A case study of Chunguang oilfield,Junggar basin[J]. Xinjiang Petroleum Geology, 2020, 41(2):147-157.
[18]	孔祥言. 高等渗流力学[M]. 合肥: 中国科学技术大学出版社, 2010.
	KONG Xiangyan. Advanced mechanics of fluids in porous media[M]. Hefei: University of Science and Technology of China Press, 2010.
[19]	王军磊, 位云生, 齐亚东, 等. 基于贝叶斯推断的产量递减综合预测新模型[J]. 天然气工业, 2022, 42(11):77-87.
	WANG Junlei, WEI Yunsheng, QI Yadong, et al. A new integrated decline prediction model based on Bayesian inference[J]. Natural Gas Industry, 2022, 42(11):77-87.
[20]	陈元千, 王鑫. 气井变产量弹性二相法的应用[J]. 油气地质与采收率, 2023, 30(5):63-66.
	CHEN Yuanqian, WANG Xin. Application of elastic two phase method with variable production in gas wells[J]. Petroleum Geology and Recovery Efficiency, 2023, 30(5):63-66.
[21]	SHI Wenyang, CHENG Shiqing, MENG Lixin, et al. Pressure transient behavior of layered commingled reservoir with vertical inhomogeneous closed boundary[J]. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 2020, 189:106995.
[22]	VAN-EVERDINGEN A F, HURST W. The application of the Laplace transformation to flow problems in reservoirs[J]. Journal of Petroleum Technology, 1949, 1(12):305-324.
[23]	STEHFEST H. Numerical inversion of Laplace transforms[J]. Communications of ACM, 1970, 13(1):47-50.
[24]	BLASINGAME T A, MCCRAY T L, LEE W J. Decline curve analysis for variable pressure drop/variable flowrate systems[R]. SPE 21513-MS, 1991.
[25]	孙贺东. 油气井现代产量递减分析方法及应用[M]. 北京: 石油工业出版社, 2013:125-126.
	SUN Hedong. Advanced production decline analysis and application[M]. Beijing: Petroleum Industry Press, 2013:125-126.

产层	砂体宽度/m	砂体长度/m	渗透率/mD	储量占比/%
盒8下亚段	280.63	340.16	0.065	15.16
山1段	428.15	645.46	0.190	67.72
山2段	312.27	497.68	0.072	17.12