页岩储集层水平井段内多簇压裂技术应用现状及认识

doi:10.7657/XJPG20200417

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

水平井段内多簇压裂技术能增加页岩储集层压裂裂缝复杂程度,提高簇间动用率,是有效改造页岩储集层的核心技术。对北美页岩气区块和中国四川盆地南部页岩气区块水平井段内多簇压裂技术的应用现状进行分析,并结合技术原理提出了几点认识：段内多簇压裂应与井间距合理匹配,并配套采用暂堵转向技术和限流射孔技术,增大射孔簇簇效率,促进裂缝均匀扩展,提高段内多簇压裂改造效果;北美页岩气区块采用段内多簇压裂技术增产,实现了页岩储集层高效开采,川南页岩气区块水平井段内多簇压裂技术起步较晚,目前在300~400 m井间距下主要开展了段内为6~8簇压裂现场试验;为了降低压裂成本、提高作业时效,长段多簇压裂将是实现效益开发的一个重要发展方向;但随着段内簇数不断增加,射孔技术、暂堵转向技术、射孔簇数与施工参数合理匹配等方面面临新挑战,亟需进一步研究,从而形成适合不同地区地质工程特征的段内多簇压裂技术。

关键词: 四川盆地, 页岩储集层, 水平井, 段内多簇压裂技术, 井间距, 簇数, 簇间距, 压裂施工参数, 配套技术

Abstract:

Multi-cluster fracturing technology in horizontal well is one of key technologies to stimulate shale reservoirs efficiently, which can increase hydraulic fracture complexity and enhance pay-gross ratio among clusters. In this paper, the application status of multi-cluster fracturing technology in the shale reservoirs in North America and southern Sichuan basin is stated and some opinions are presented by combing with its mechanism. Multi-cluster fracturing technology should match with well spacing, diversion technology and limited-entry perforation technology should be used to improve cluster efficiency and promote fracture propagation evenly so as to increase multi-cluster fracturing effectiveness. Multi-cluster fracturing has been extensively applied in the shale areas in North America to enhance production and realize efficient development, but the technology in the shale area in the southern Sichuan basin started relatively late and at present field tests of the hydraulic fracturing technology with 6-8 clusters in horizontal sections have been conducted in horizontal wells with the well spacing of 300-400 m. In order to reduce cost and improve operation efficiency, long horizontal section multi-cluster fracturing is considered as a promising trend for efficient development. However, with the increase of cluster number, the matching of perforation technology, diversion technology, cluster number with operation parameters is facing challenges, and a multi-cluster fracturing technology suitable for different geological and engineering characteristics of the target areas needs to be further studied.

Key words: shale reservoir, horizontal well, multi-cluster fracturing technology, well spacing, cluster number, cluster spacing, fracturing operation parameter, matching technology

中图分类号:

TE357

赵志恒, 郑有成, 范宇, 宋毅, 郭兴午. 页岩储集层水平井段内多簇压裂技术应用现状及认识[J]. 新疆石油地质, 2020, 41(4): 499-504.

ZHAO Zhiheng, ZHENG Youcheng, FAN Yu, SONG Yi, GUO Xingwu. Application and Cognition of Multi-Cluster Fracturing Technology in Horizontal Wells in Shale Reservoirs[J]. Xinjiang Petroleum Geology, 2020, 41(4): 499-504.

图/表 3

参考文献 35

[1]	蒋裕强, 董大忠, 漆麟, 等. 页岩气储层的基本特征及其评价[J]. 天然气工业, 2010,30(10):7-12. doi: 10.3787/j.issn.10000976.2010.10.002
	JIANG Yuqiang, DONG Dazhong, QI Lin, et al. Basic features and evaluation of shale gas reservoirs[J]. Natural Gas Industry, 2010,30(10):7-12.
[2]	CURTIS J B. Fractured shale-gas systems[J]. AAPG Bulletin, 2002,86(11):1 921-1 938.
[3]	刘欢, 尹俊禄, 王博涛. 水平井体积压裂簇间距优化方法[J]. 天然气勘探与开发, 2017,40(2):63-68.
	LIU Huan, YIN Junlu, WANG Botao. Optimization of cluster spacing in horizontal well volume fracturing[J]. Natural Gas Exploration and Development, 2017,40(2):63-68.
[4]	吴奇, 胥云, 刘玉章, 等. 美国页岩气体积改造技术现状及对我国的启示[J]. 石油钻采工艺, 2011,33(2):1-7.
	WU Qi, XU Yun, LIU Yuzhang, et al. The current situation of stimulated reservoir volume for shale in U.S. and its inspiration to China[J]. Oil Drilling & Production Technology, 2011,33(2):1-7.
[5]	任龙, 苏玉亮, 鲁明晶, 等. 超低渗油藏分段多簇压裂水平井裂缝参数优化[J]. 西安石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2015,30(4):49-52.
	REN Long, SU Yuliang, LU Mingjing, et al. Optimization of fracture parameters of segmented multi-cluster fracturing horizontal wells in unltra-low permeability reservoirs[J]. Journal of Xi’an Shiyou University(Natural Science Edition), 2015,30(4):49-52.
[6]	吴奇, 胥云, 王晓泉, 等. 非常规油气藏体积改造技术:内涵、优化设计与实现[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2012,39(3):352-358.
	WU Qi, XU Yun, WANG Xiaoquan, et al. Volume fracturing technology of unconventional reservoirs:connotation,optimization design and implementation[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2012,39(3):352-358.
[7]	王天驹, 陈赞, 王蕊, 等. 致密砂岩油藏体积压裂簇间距优化新方法[J]. 新疆石油地质, 2019,40(3):351-356.
	WANG Tianju, CHEN Zan, WANG Rui, et al. A new method for cluster spacing optimization during volumetric fracturing in tight sandstone oil reservoirs[J]. Xinjiang Petroleum Geology, 2019,40(3):351-356.
[8]	SHELLEY R, SHAH K, UNDERWOOD K, et al. Utica well performance evaluation：a multi-well pad case history[J]. SPE 181400-MS, 2016.
[9]	YUYI J, DONAHOE T, VANGILDER C, et al. Influencing fracture growth with stage sequencing[J]. SPE 184057-MS, 2016.
[10]	JARIPATKE O A, BARMAN I, NDUNGU J G, et al. Review of Permian completion designs and results[J]. SPE 191560-MS, 2018.
[11]	ALIMAHOMED F, MALPANI R, JOSE R, et al. Stacked pay pad development in the Midland basin[J]. SPE 187496-MS, 2017.
[12]	范宇, 周小金, 曾波, 等. 密切割分段压裂工艺在深层页岩气Zi2井的应用[J]. 新疆石油地质, 2019,40(2):223-227.
	FAN Yu, ZHOU Xiaojin, ZENG Bo, et al. Application of intensive staged fracturing technology in deep shale gas Well Zi-2[J]. Xinjiang Petroleum Geology, 2019,40(2):223-227.
[13]	MODELAND N, BULLER D, CHONG K K. Statistical analysis of the effect of completion methodology on production in the Haynesville shale[R]. SPE 144120, 2011.
[14]	CHENG Y. Impacts of the number of perforation clusters and cluster spacing on production performance of horizontal shale-gas wells[R]. SPE 138843, 2012.
[15]	胥云, 雷群, 陈铭, 等. 体积改造技术理论研究进展与发展方向[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2018,45(5):874-887.
	XU Yun, LEI Qun, CHEN Ming, et al. Progress and development of volume stimulation techniques[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2018,45(5):874-887.
[16]	CADOTTE R J, WHITSETT A, SORRELL M, et al. Modern completion optimization in the Haynesville shale[R]. SPE 187315-MS, 2017.
[17]	JOHNSTON B, VOLKMER N. Predicting success in the Haynesville shale：a geologic,completion,and production analysis[R]. URTeC 2902880, 2018.
[18]	RICHTER K M. Midland basin Wolfcamp shale:completions observations and lateral length optimization[R]. URTeC 2665631, 2017.
[19]	BARRAZA J, CAPDEROU C, JONES M C, et al. Increased cluster efficiency and fracture network complexity using degradable diverter particulates to increase production:Permian basin Wolfcamp shale case study[R]. SPE 187218-MS, 2017.
[20]	EVANS S, SIDDIQUI S, MAGNESS J. Impact of cluster spacing on infill completions in the Eagle Ford[R]. URTeC 2899323, 2018.
[21]	EVANS S, HOLLEY E, DAWSON K, et al. Eagle Ford case history:evaluation of diversion techniques to increase stimulation effectiveness[R]. URTeC 2459883, 2016.
[22]	RODIONOV Y, DEFEU C, GAKHAR K, et al. Optimization of infill well development using a novel far-field diversion technique in the Eagle Ford shale[R]. URTeC 2670497, 2017.
[23]	LING Kegang, WU Xingru, HAN Guoqing, et al. Optimising the multistage fracturing interval for horizontal wells in Bakken and Three Forks formations[R]. SPE 181788-MS, 2016.
[24]	VANDOMELEN M S. A practical guide to modern diversion technology[R]. SPE 185120-MS, 2017.
[25]	WEDDLE P, GRIFFIN L, PEARSON C M. Mining the Bakken Ⅱ:pushing the envelope with extreme limited entry perforating[R]. SPE 189880-MS, 2018.
[26]	THOMSON J, ZASLAVSKY G, LESHCHYSHYN T, et al. Completion design production case study in the Duvernay shale formation[R]. SPE 181715-MS, 2016.
[27]	马新华. 四川盆地南部页岩气富集规律与规模有效开发探索[J]. 天然气工业, 2018,38(10):1-10.
	MA Xinhua. Enrichment laws and scale effective development of shale gas in the southern Sichuan basin[J]. Natural Gas Industry, 2018,38(10):1-10.
[28]	邹才能, 董大忠, 王玉满, 等. 中国页岩气特征、挑战及前景(一)[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2015,42(6):689-701.
	ZOU Caineng, DONG Dazhong, WANG Yuman, et al. Shale gas in China:characteristics,challenges and prospects(Ⅰ)[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2015,42(6):689-701.
[29]	田兴旺, 胡国艺, 苏桂萍, 等. 川南威远地区W201井古生界海相页岩矿物特征[J]. 新疆石油地质, 2018,39(4):409-415.
	TIAN Xingwang, HU Guoyi, SU Guiping, et al. Mineralogical characteristics of Paleozoic marine shales in Well W201 of Weiyuan area,southern Sichuan basin[J]. Xinjiang Petroleum Geology, 2018,39(4):409-415.
[30]	陈朝伟, 石林, 项德贵. 长宁—威远页岩气示范区套管变形机理及对策[J]. 天然气工业, 2016,36(11):70-75.
	CHEN Chaowei, SHI Lin, XIANG Degui. Mechanism of casing deformation in the Changning-Weiyuan national shale gas project demonstration area and countermeasures[J]. Natural Gas Industry, 2016,36(11):70-75.
[31]	高东伟. 页岩气水平井压裂细分段密分簇优化设计及应用[J]. 长江大学学报(自然科学版), 2019,16(4):40-43.
	GAO Dongwei. Optimum design and application of fine segmentation and dense clustering for fracturing in shale gas horizontal wells[J]. Journal of Yangtze University(Natural Science Edition), 2019,16(4):40-43.
[32]	高东伟. 涪陵页岩气田焦石坝区块压裂试气工艺技术综述[J]. 油气井测试, 2017,26(2):50-53.
	GAO Dongwei. Review of fracturing testing technology at Coke Dam blocks in Fuling shale gas field[J]. Well Testing, 2017,26(2):50-53.
[33]	谢军. 长宁—威远国家级页岩气示范区建设实践与成效[J]. 天然气工业, 2018,38(2):1-7.
	XIE Jun. Practices and achievements of the Changning-Weiyuan shale gas national demonstration project construction[J]. Natural Gas Industry, 2018,38(2):1-7.
[34]	蒲泊伶, 董大忠, 耳闯, 等. 川南地区龙马溪组页岩有利储层发育特征及其影响因素[J]. 天然气工业, 2013,33(12):41-47.
	PU Boling, DONG Dazhong, ER Chuang, et al. Favorable reservoir characteristics of the Longmaxi shale in the southern Sichuan basin and their influencing factors[J]. Natural Gas Industry, 2013,33(12):41-47.
[35]	MILLER G, LINDSAY G, BAIHLY J, et al. Parent well refracturing:economic safety nets in an uneconomic market[R]. SPE 180200-MS,2016, 2016.

页岩气区块	埋深/m	总有机碳含量/%	孔隙度/%	脆性矿物含量/%	压力系数	水平应力差/MPa	地层温度/℃
川南页岩气区块	2 000~4 500	2.5~4.8	3.4~7.9	50~80	1.2~2.1	9~20	70~145
Haynesville 页岩气区块	3 000~4 700	2.0~7.0	5.0~11.0	65~75	1.6~2.1	3~6	149~177
Eagle Ford 页岩气区块	1 300~3 600	2.0~6.5	3.4~14.6	67~87	1.3~2.0		68~168
Duvernay 页岩气区块	3 000~4 200	2.0~6.0	3.0~6.0	>40	1.8~2.1		>100