川南罗布向斜五峰组—龙马溪组页岩孔隙分形特征与主控因素

doi:10.7657/XJPG20220204

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

四川盆地南缘罗布向斜上奥陶统五峰组—下志留统龙马溪组页岩具有厚度大、有机碳含量高、分布范围广、有机质热演化程度适中等特点,有可能成为下一步页岩气勘探的重要领域。为更好地表征研究区页岩非均质性及其对页岩气富集的影响,根据岩矿、地化、测井资料以及CO₂和N₂吸附实验,对研究区五峰组—龙马溪组龙一₁亚段各小层开展了页岩分形特征研究。结果表明,研究区各小层的总有机碳含量、矿物成分和孔隙度均存在较大差异,储集层非均质性强,页岩孔隙分形维数为2.711 0~2.794 8,平均为2.747 0,其中五峰组和龙一31小层的分形维数较高,龙一41小层的分形维数最低;有机碳和生物成因石英对页岩微孔的发育具有促进作用,页岩平均孔径越小,孔隙数量越多,孔隙结构越复杂,分形维数越大。

关键词: 四川盆地, 滇黔北坳陷, 罗布向斜, 五峰组, 龙马溪组, 页岩, 非均质性, 孔隙结构, 分形特征

Abstract:

In the Luobu syncline, southern Sichuan basin, the shale in the Upper Ordovician Wufeng formation (O₃w)-Lower Silurian Longmaxi formation (S₁l) is characterized by large thickness, high organic carbon content, wide distribution range and moderate thermal evolution of organic matter, making it an important target for subsequent shale gas exploration. In order to better characterize the heterogeneity of shale pore structure and clarify the influence of heterogeneity on shale gas enrichment in the study area, the fractal characteristics of the shale in layers of O₃w-S₁l11 in the study area were analyzed using the rock-mineral analysis, geochemical and well logging data, and CO₂ and N₂ adsorption analysis. The results show that the layers in the study area are very different in TOC content, mineral compositions and porosity, and the reservoir is highly heterogeneous. The fractal dimension of shale pores ranges from 2.711 0 to 2.794 8, with an average of 2.747 0; the value is relatively high for O₃w and Layer #1 in S₁l11, and the lowest for Layer #4 in S₁l11. The organic carbon and bio-quartz can promote the development of shale micropores. The smaller the average pore size of shale, the more the pores, and the more complex the pore structure, and the larger the fractal dimension.

Key words: Sichuan basin, Dianqianbei depression, Luobu syncline, Wufeng formation, Longmaxi formation, shale, heterogeneity, pore structure, fractal characteristic

中图分类号:

TE122.23

段文刚, 吝文, 田继军, 马静辉, 杜猛, 罗锦昌. 川南罗布向斜五峰组—龙马溪组页岩孔隙分形特征与主控因素[J]. 新疆石油地质, 2022, 43(2): 153-159.

DUAN Wengang, LIN Wen, TIAN Jijun, MA Jinghui, DU Meng, LUO Jinchang. Fractal Characteristics and Main Controlling Factors of Wufeng-Longmaxi Formation Shale in Luobu Syncline, Southern Sichuan Basin[J]. Xinjiang Petroleum Geology, 2022, 43(2): 153-159.

图/表 7

表1

研究区页岩样品主要组分含量及孔隙度测试结果"

样品编号	深度/ m	层位	总有机碳含量/%	矿物含量/%							孔隙度/ %
样品编号	深度/ m	层位	总有机碳含量/%	石英	钾长石	斜长石	方解石	白云石	黄铁矿	黏土矿物	孔隙度/ %
YS1-8	2 234.81	龙一41小层	2.10	39.10	5.40	5.50	12.60	5.60	3.60	28.10	1.05
YS2-8	3 003.75		1.76	33.10	1.00	6.50	11.10	1.70	4.60	42.00	0.51
YS2-11	3 010.46		2.28	31.00	0	4.60	12.60	1.70	4.60	45.50	0.77
YS2-15	3 017.74		3.41	39.30	0	3.60	18.80	4.70	5.60	28.00	0.93
YS3-21	2 972.94		1.30	31.90	1.20	8.30	8.80	5.20	4.00	40.60	0.46
YS3-23	2 977.27		1.60	30.40	1.10	5.40	10.20	5.90	4.00	43.00	0.62
YS3-25	2 981.25		1.97	31.10	0.70	4.80	10.50	6.70	4.50	41.70	0.54
YS4-52	2 986.30		3.38	39.60	0.80	2.70	17.90	5.30	4.60	29.10	3.19
YS6-1	2 191.80		3.89	31.10	2.70	5.70	14.60	5.50	7.80	32.60	3.07
YS6-2	2 194.25		1.52	29.90	1.80	6.40	10.00	4.00	4.80	43.10	3.73
YS6-3	2 196.51		2.44	28.60	1.40	6.80	8.90	7.70	7.90	38.70	3.82
YS6-4	2 198.05		1.93	27.90	0.60	5.40	11.70	4.60	6.30	43.50	3.73
YS6-5	2 199.54		2.49	31.60	0.60	3.80	17.70	8.60	5.40	32.30	3.88
YS1-14	2 245.95	龙一31小层	3.80	39.10	5.40	5.50	12.60	5.60	3.60	28.10	1.55
YS2-18	3 023.85		3.50	41.60	0	3.70	18.30	4.50	5.60	26.30	0.63
YS2-20	3 026.83		3.68	46.50	0	3.00	14.00	4.20	5.70	26.60	1.00
YS3-27	2 986.32		3.19	36.30	0.70	4.40	15.50	11.00	4.70	27.40	1.14
YS3-29	2 989.49		3.70	40.00	0	2.80	17.90	8.20	4.70	26.40	1.00
YS3-31	2 993.25		3.40	35.20	0.70	3.50	16.40	15.60	3.30	25.30	1.00
YS6-6	2 204.00		3.55	31.40	0.60	4.60	16.90	7.50	5.20	33.80	4.40
YS6-9	2 209.23		3.37	37.30	0.70	3.90	14.40	13.00	5.40	25.30	5.16
YS1-18	2 251.67	龙一21小层	3.70	45.70	5.30	4.80	15.60	7.40	3.80	17.40	1.76
YS2-22	3 031.73		3.28	55.50	0	2.40	13.20	5.70	4.20	19.00	1.55
YS3-33	2 997.14		3.65	41.90	0	4.30	17.20	13.10	4.10	19.40	1.12
YS3-35	3 000.85		3.53	43.00	0	1.50	25.40	13.80	2.10	14.20	0.75
YS4-58	2 999.07		3.73	53.90	0	2.80	13.90	4.70	3.30	21.40	3.78
YS6-10	2 211.35		3.76	40.20	0	5.20	14.30	8.90	4.50	26.90	4.46
YS6-11	2 213.13		3.75	25.70	0.80	5.40	16.80	19.40	5.20	26.70	4.91
YS6-12	2 215.07		3.01	27.30	1.80	3.70	23.50	21.20	3.10	19.40	3.88
YS6-13	2 216.13		4.98	53.80	0	4.40	10.50	8.60	2.90	19.80	5.94
YS6-14	2 217.36		3.79	32.00	0	6.60	21.90	10.90	5.10	23.50	3.96
YS1-20	2 255.55	龙一11小层	4.50	40.90	5.40	5.60	24.40	4.40	3.00	16.20	3.26
YS2-24	3 036.04	龙一11小层	4.77	35.10	1.10	3.60	26.70	8.90	4.00	20.60	2.46
YS1-21	2 257.27	五峰组	4.30	28.30	3.40	10.40	33.30	8.50	4.40	11.70	1.91
YS1-23	2 261.40		1.30	22.20	6.30	7.60	27.30	11.50	3.30	21.80	1.17
YS2-26	3 039.78		2.30	18.30	0	8.70	8.90	19.10	12.40	32.60	0.84
YS3-37	3 003.16		3.98	18.10	0	2.70	34.40	16.70	2.70	25.40	1.43
YS6-17	2 223.63		0.78	22.50	0.50	4.50	27.20	16.90	0.70	27.70	0.37

表1

图1

图2

图3

图4

图5

图6

参考文献 29

[1]	黄小青, 韩永胜, 杨庆, 等. 昭通太阳区块浅层页岩气水平井试气返排规律[J]. 新疆石油地质, 2020, 41(4):457-463.
	HUANG Xiaoqing, HAN Yongsheng, YANG Qing, et al. Gas testing flowback rules of shallow shale gas horizontal wells in TY block of Zhaotong[J]. Xinjiang Petroleum Geology, 2020, 41(4):457-463.
[2]	邹才能, 赵群, 丛连铸, 等. 中国页岩气开发进展、潜力及前景[J]. 天然气工业, 2021, 41(1):1-14.
	ZOU Caineng, ZHAO Qun, CONG Lianzhu, et al. Development progress,potential and prospect of shale gas in China[J]. Natural Gas Industry, 2021, 41(1):1-14.
[3]	胡东风, 王良军, 黄仁春, 等. 四川盆地中国石化探区油气勘探历程与启示[J]. 新疆石油地质, 2021, 42(3):283-290.
	HU Dongfeng, WANG Liangjun, HUANG Renchun, et al. Petroleum exploration history and enlightenment in Sichuan basin:a case study on Sinopec exploration areas[J]. Xinjiang Petroleum Geology, 2021, 42(3):283-290.
[4]	王红岩, 周尚文, 刘德勋, 等. 页岩气地质评价关键实验技术的进展与展望[J]. 天然气工业, 2020, 40(6):1-17.
	WANG Hongyan, ZHOU Shangwen, LIU Dexun, et al. Progress and prospect of key experimental technologies for shale gas geological evaluation[J]. Natural Gas Industry, 2020, 40(6):1-17.
[5]	张琴, 梁峰, 梁萍萍, 等. 页岩分形特征及主控因素研究:以威远页岩气田龙马溪组页岩为例[J]. 中国矿业大学学报, 2020, 49(1):110-122.
	ZHANG Qin, LIANG Feng, LIANG Pingping, et al. Investigation of fractal characteristics and its main controlling factors of shale reservoir:a case study of the Longmaxi shale in Weiyuan shale gas field[J]. Journal of China University of Mining & Technology, 2020, 49(1):110-122.
[6]	WANG Min, XUE Haitao, TIAN Shansi, et al. Fractal characteristics of Upper Cretaceous lacustrine shale from the Songliao basin,NE China[J]. Marine and Petroleum Geology, 2015, 67:144-153. doi: 10.1016/j.marpetgeo.2015.05.011
[7]	杨锐. 鄂西渝东地区五峰组—龙马溪组页岩孔隙结构与连通孔隙流体示踪[D]. 武汉:中国地质大学(武汉), 2018.
	YANG Rui. Pore structure and tracer-containing fluid migration in connected pores of Wufeng and Longmaxi shales from western Hubei and eastern Chongqing regions[D]. Wuhan:China University of Geosciences (Wuhan), 2018.
[8]	李志清, 王伟, 王晓明, 等. 页岩微纳米孔隙结构分形特征研究[J]. 工程地质学报, 2018, 26(2):495-503.
	LI Zhiqing, WANG Wei, WANG Xiaoming, et al. Study on fractal characteristics of micro-nano pore structure of shale[J]. Journal of Engineering Geology, 2018, 26(2):495-503.
[9]	徐政语, 梁兴, 鲁慧丽, 等. 四川盆地南缘昭通页岩气示范区构造变形特征及页岩气保存条件[J]. 天然气工业, 2019, 39(10):22-31.
	XU Zhengyu, LIANG Xing, LU Huili, et al. Structural deformation characteristics and shale gas preservation conditions in the Zhaotong National Shale Gas Demonstration Area along the southern margin of the Sichuan basin[J]. Natural Gas Industry, 2019, 39(10):22-31.
[10]	梁兴, 叶熙, 张介辉, 等. 滇黔北坳陷威信凹陷页岩气成藏条件分析与有利区优选[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2011, 38(6):693-699.
	LIANG Xing, YE Xi, ZHANG Jiehui, et al. Reservoir forming conditions and favorable exploration zones of shale gas in the Weixin sag,Dianqianbei depression[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2011, 38(6):693-699.
[11]	陈科洛, 张廷山, 陈晓慧, 等. 页岩微观孔隙模型构建:以滇黔北地区志留系龙马溪组页岩为例[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2018, 45(3):396-405.
	CHEN Keluo, ZHANG Tingshan, CHEN Xiaohui, et al. Model construction of micro-pores in shale:a case study of Silurian Longmaxi formation shale in Dianqianbei area,SW China[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2018, 45(3):396-405.
[12]	AVNIR D, JARONIEC M. An isotherm equation for adsorption on fractal surfaces of heterogeneous porous materials[J]. Langmuir, 1989, 5(6):1 431-1 433. doi: 10.1021/la00090a032
[13]	JARONIEC M. Evaluation of the fractal dimension from a single adsorption isotherm[J]. Langmuir, 1995, 11(6):2 316-2 317. doi: 10.1021/la00006a076
[14]	PFEIFERPER P, AVNIR D. Chemistry nonintegral dimensions between two and three[J]. Journal of Chemistry and Physics, 1983, 79(7):3 369-3 558.
[15]	徐勇, 吕成福, 陈国俊, 等. 川东南龙马溪组页岩孔隙分形特征[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2015, 27(4):32-39.
	XU Yong, LV Chengfu, CHEN Guojun, et al. Fractal characteristics of shale pores of Longmaxi formation in southeast Sichuan basin[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2015, 27(4):32-39.
[16]	LIU Xiangjun, XIONG Jian, LIANG Lixi. Investigation of pore structure and fractal characteristics of organic-rich Yanchang formation shale in central China by nitrogen adsorption/desorption analysis[J]. Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering, 2015, 22:62-72. doi: 10.1016/j.jngse.2014.11.020
[17]	YANG Feng, NING Zhengfu, LIU Huiqing. Fractal characteristics of shales from a shale gas reservoir in the Sichuan basin,China[J]. Fuel, 2014, 115:378-384. doi: 10.1016/j.fuel.2013.07.040
[18]	LIU Jianzhong, ZHU Jiefeng, CHENG Jun, et al. Pore structure and fractal analysis of Ximeng lignite under microwave irradiation[J]. Fuel, 2015, 146:41-50. doi: 10.1016/j.fuel.2015.01.019
[19]	SING K S W, EVERETT D H, HAUL R A W, et al. Reporting physisorption data for gas/solid systems with special reference to the determination of surface area and porosity[J]. Pure & Applied Chemistry, 1985, 57(4):603-619.
[20]	白志强, 刘树根, 孙玮, 等. 四川盆地西南雷波地区五峰组—龙马溪组页岩储层特征[J]. 成都理工大学学报(自然科学版), 2013, 40(5):521-531.
	BAI Zhiqiang, LIU Shugen, SUN Wei, et al. Reservoir characteristics of Wufeng formation-Longmaxi formation in southwest of Sichuan basin,China[J]. Journal of Chengdu University of Technology(Science & Technology Edition), 2013, 40(5):521-531.
[21]	TIAN Hui, PAN Lei, XIAO Xianming, et al. A preliminary study on the pore characterization of Lower Silurian black shales in the Chuandong thrust fold belt,southwestern China using low pressure N₂ adsorption and FE-SEM methods[J]. Marine and Petroleum Geology, 2013, 48:8-19. doi: 10.1016/j.marpetgeo.2013.07.008
[22]	周理, 吕昌忠, 王怡林, 等. 述评超临界温度气体在多空固体上的物理吸附[J]. 化学进展, 1999, 11(3):221-226.
	ZHOU Li, LÜ Changzhong, WANG Yilin, et al. Physisorption of gases on porous solids at above-critical temperatures[J]. Progress in Chemistry, 1999, 11(3) :221-226.
[23]	YAO Y, LIU D, TANG D, et al. Fractal characterization of adsorption-pores of coals from north China:an investigation on CH₄ adsorption capacity of coals[J]. International Journal of Coal Geology, 2008, 73:27-42. doi: 10.1016/j.coal.2007.07.003
[24]	GREGG S J, SING K S W. Adsorption,surface area and porosity(second edition)[M]. New York: Academic Press, 1982.
[25]	郭英海, 赵迪斐. 微观尺度海相页岩储层微观非均质性研究[J]. 中国矿业大学学报, 2015, 44(2):300-306.
	GUO Yinghai, ZHAO Difei. Analysis of micro-scale heterogeneity characteristics in marine shale gas reservoir[J]. Journal of China University of Mining & Technology, 2015, 44(2):300-306.
[26]	陈尚斌. 页岩储层微观结构及其吸附非均质性研究评述[J]. 煤炭科学技术, 2016, 44(6):23-32.
	CHEN Shangbin. Study review on microstructure and adsorption heterogeneity of shale reservoir[J]. Coal Science and Technology, 2016, 44(6):23-32.
[27]	BU Honglin, JU Yiwen, TAN Jingqiang, et al. Fractal characteristics of pores in non-marine shales from the Huainan coalfield,eastern China[J]. Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering, 2015, 24:166-177. doi: 10.1016/j.jngse.2015.03.021
[28]	LI Ang, DING Wenlong, HE Jianhua, et al. Investigation of pore structure and fractal characteristics of organic-rich shale reservoirs:a case study of Lower Cambrian Qiongzhusi formation in Malong block of eastern Yunnan province,South China[J]. Marine and Petroleum Geology, 2016, 70:46-57. doi: 10.1016/j.marpetgeo.2015.11.004
[29]	王鹏万, 邹辰, 李娴静, 等. 昭通示范区页岩气富集高产的地质主控因素[J]. 石油学报, 2018, 39(7):744-753.
	WANG Pengwan, ZOU Chen, LI Xianjing, et al. Main geological controlling factors of shale gas enrichment and high yield in Zhaotong demonstration area[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2018, 39(7):744-753.