国外蒸汽泡沫驱矿场实施效果

doi:10.7657/XJPG20210117

新疆石油地质 ›› 2021, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (1): 120-126.doi: 10.7657/XJPG20210117

• 应用技术 • 上一篇

国外蒸汽泡沫驱矿场实施效果

宫宇宁¹, 王宇豪², 朱舟元³()

^1. 中国石油辽河油田分公司勘探开发研究院,辽宁盘锦 124000
^2. 中国石化石油机械股份有限公司江钻公司,武汉 430000
^3. 中国石油大学（北京）安全与海洋工程学院,北京 102249

收稿日期:2020-01-01 修回日期:2020-05-22 出版日期:2021-02-01 发布日期:2021-02-24
通讯作者: 朱舟元 E-mail:zhuzy02@cup.edu.cn
作者简介:宫宇宁（1975-）,男,辽宁岫岩人,高级工程师,硕士,稠油油藏开发,（Tel）18942783182（E-mail）gongyn_lh@petrochina.
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金(51804315);中国石油科技重大专项(2017E-1604)

Field Application of Steam Foam Flooding in Foreign Oilfields

GONG Yuning¹, WANG Yuhao², ZHU Zhouyuan³()

^1. Research Institute of Exploration and Development, Liaohe Oilfield Company, PetroChina, Panjin, Liaoning 124000, China
^2. Jiangzuan Company, Petroleum Machinery Co., Ltd, Sinopec, Wuhan, Hubei 430000, China
^3. School of Safety and Ocean Engineering, China University of Petroleum, Beijing 102249, China

Received:2020-01-01 Revised:2020-05-22 Online:2021-02-01 Published:2021-02-24
Contact: ZHU Zhouyuan E-mail:zhuzy02@cup.edu.cn

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

以文献调研手段对18个国外蒸汽泡沫驱油田区块的现场实施效果进行评价,研究了蒸汽温度、蒸汽干度、起泡剂类型、起泡剂质量分数、注入时机和起泡剂注入方式对蒸汽泡沫驱增产效果的影响。蒸汽泡沫驱广泛用于提高蒸汽驱或蒸汽吞吐的蒸汽波及效率,进而提高热采的采收率。蒸汽泡沫驱在美国、加拿大、委内瑞拉的众多油田都进行了成功的先导试验及工业化应用。结合蒸汽泡沫驱矿场实施效果,对蒸汽泡沫驱各个影响因素提出了合理的建议,为实施蒸汽泡沫驱技术提供参考。

关键词: 蒸汽泡沫驱, 蒸汽吞吐, 蒸汽驱, 提高采收率, 实施效果, 主控因素, 油田案例分析

Abstract:

This paper reviews field applications of steam foam flooding in foreign oilfields, analyzes and summarizes the rules based on 18 oilfield cases. Specifically, we investigated how steam temperature, steam dryness, surfactant type, surfactant concentration, and timing and method of injecting surfactants influence the stimulation effect of steam foam flooding. Steam foam has been widely used to improve the sweep efficiency of steam flooding or cyclic steam stimulation, and consequently improving thermal recovery. The technology has been successfully piloted and applied on an industrial scale in many oil fields such as in the United States, Canada, and Venezuela. Finally, according to the field performances, we put forward some proposals for improving steam foam flooding, with the intent to provide referential support to field application of steam foam flooding.

Key words: steam foam flooding, steam huff and puff, steam flooding, enhanced oil recovery, field performances, controlling factor, oilfield case analysis

中图分类号:

TE345

宫宇宁, 王宇豪, 朱舟元. 国外蒸汽泡沫驱矿场实施效果[J]. 新疆石油地质, 2021, 42(1): 120-126.

GONG Yuning, WANG Yuhao, ZHU Zhouyuan. Field Application of Steam Foam Flooding in Foreign Oilfields[J]. Xinjiang Petroleum Geology, 2021, 42(1): 120-126.

图/表 6

表1

图1

图2

Table 2

Table 3

图3

参考文献 27

[1]	HIRASKI G J . The steam-foam process[J]. Journal of Petroleum Technology, 1989,41(5):449-456.
[2]	钟立国, 王成, 刘建斌 , 等. 中深层稠油油藏蒸汽-氮气复合吞吐技术[J]. 新疆石油地质, 2019,40(2):194-198.
	ZHONG Liguo, WANG Cheng, LIU Jianbin , et al. Nitrogen assisted steam stimulation technology for mid-deep heavy oil reservoirs[J]. Xinjiang Petroleum Geology, 2019,40(2):194-198.
[3]	冯翠菊, 王春生, 张蓉 , 等. 稠油重力泄水辅助蒸汽驱三维物理模拟实验[J]. 新疆石油地质, 2019,40(4):464-467.
	FENG Cuiju, WANG Chunsheng, ZHANG Rong , et al. Gravity water-drainage assisted steam flooding of heavy oil:3D physical modeling experiment[J]. Xinjiang Petroleum Geology, 2019,40(4):464-467.
[4]	ADKINS J D . Field results of adding surfactant to cyclic steam wells[R]. SPE 12007, 1983.
[5]	SANDER P R, CLARK G J, LAU E C . Steam-foam diversion process developed to overcome steam override in Athabasca[R]. SPE 22630, 1991.
[6]	PLOEG J F, DUERKSEN J H . Two successful steam/foam field tests,Sections 15A and 26C,Midway-Sunset field[R]. SPE 13609, 1985.
[7]	FRIEDMANN F, SMITH M E, GUICE W R , et al. Steam-foam mechanistic field trial in the Midway-Sunset field[J]. SPE Reservoir Engineering, 1994,9(4):297-304. doi: 10.2118/21780-PA
[8]	PATZEK T W, KOINIS M T . Kern River steam-foam pilots[J]. Journal of Petroleum Technology, 1990,42(4):496-503. doi: 10.2118/17380-PA
[9]	PATZEK T W, MYHILL N A . Simulation of the Bishop steam foam pilot[R]. SPE 18786, 1989.
[10]	ESON R L . Improvement in sweep efficiencies in thermal oil-recovery projects through the application of in-situ foams[R]. SPE 11806, 1983.
[11]	MOHAMMADI S S, MCCOLLUM T J . Steam-foam pilot project in Guadalupe field,California[R]. SPE 15054, 1989.
[12]	BAUTISTA L S, WANINGER E A . The effect of steam/foam injection in a steamflood experiencing downdip steam migration[R]. SPE 25783, 1993.
[13]	ESON R L, O,NESKY S K. The application of in-situ steam foams to improve recovery in mature steam drives[R]. SPE 11704, 1983.
[14]	DELAMAIDE E, CUENCA A, CHABERT M . State of the art review of the steam foam process[R]. SPE 181160, 2016.
[15]	DJABBARAH N F, WEBER S L, FREEMAN D C , et al. Laboratory design and field demonstration of steam diversion with foam[R]. SPE 20067, 1990.
[16]	MOHAMMADI S S, COOMBE D A, STEVENSON V M . Test of steam-foam process for mobility control in South Casper Creek reservoir[J]. Journal of Canadian Petroleum Technology, 1993,32(10):49-54.
[17]	YANNIMARAS D V, KOBBE R K . Evaluation of steam-surfactant-fuel gas co-current injection into two patterns of a mature steamflood[R]. SPE 17382, 1988.
[18]	KEIJZER P P M, MUIJS H M, JANSSEN-VAN R R, et al. Application of steam foam in the Tia Juana field,Venezuela:laboratory tests and field results[R]. SPE 14905, 1986.
[19]	MENDEZ Z, ALVAREZ J M, ESCOBAR E , et al. Cyclic steam injection with additives:laboratory and field test results of steam/foam and steam/solvent processes[R]. SPE 24632, 1982.
[20]	ROBAINA R M, ZIRITT J L . Evaluation of a surfactant:steam-soak pilot test in the Bolivar Coast,Venezuela[R]. SPE 17386, 1988.
[21]	ELLIOT C S, ALDEA C H, CALARASU D , et al. Field trial results obtained with a foam block during a steam drive experiment in the Romanian Levantine-Moreni reservoir[R]. Stavanger, Norway:6th European Symposium on Improved Oil Recovery, 1991.
[22]	MOHAMMADI S S, VAN SL KE D C, GANONG B L. Steam-foam pilot project in Dome-Tumbador,Midway-Sunset field[R]. SPE 16736, 1989.
[23]	MOHAMMADI S S, TENZER J R . Steam-foam pilot project at Dome-Tumbador,Midway-Sunset field:part 2[R]. SPE 20201, 1990.
[24]	ESON R L, COOKE R W A. Comprehensive analysis of steam foam diverters and application methods[R]. SPE 18785, 1989.
[25]	GAUGLITZ P A, SMITH M E, HOLTZCLAW M I , et al. Optimization of steam/foam for profile control:Midway-Sunset 26C[R]. SPE 25781, 1993.
[26]	PATZEK T W . Field applications of steam foam for mobility improvement and profile control[J]. SPE Reservoir Engineering, 1996,11(2):79-86. doi: 10.2118/29612-PA
[27]	VAN LOOKEREN J . Calculation methods for linear and radial steam flow in oil reservoirs[J]. Society of Petroleum Engineers Journal, 1983,23(3):427-439. doi: 10.2118/6788-PA

油田所在地	油田名称	区块名称	蒸汽泡沫驱年份	油藏埋深/m	原油黏度/ (mPa·s)	原油密度/ (g·cm^-3)	初始开发方式	油藏厚度/m	孔隙度/%	渗透率/ mD
美国加州	Midway-Sunset	15A	1983	335	900	0.979	蒸汽驱	95.00	36.5	3 900
美国加州	Midway-Sunset	26C	1983	365	1 500	0.973	蒸汽驱	79.00	29.0	1 390
美国加州	Midway-Sunset	Dome- Tumbador	1985—1988	490		0.992	蒸汽驱	134.00	34.0	2 150
美国加州	Kern River	Bishop	1982	185		0.979	蒸汽吞吐, 蒸汽驱	16.00	30.0
美国加州	Kern River	Mecca	1980—1985	305		0.979	蒸汽吞吐, 蒸汽驱	22.50	30.0
美国加州	Kern River	McManus 208		133			蒸汽吞吐, 蒸汽驱	30.00	35.0	1 800
美国加州	Guadalupe		1984—1986	850	560	1.007	蒸汽驱	8.50	35.0	1 550
美国加州	Cymric	Section 26W	1991	330	2 000	0.982	蒸汽驱	7.00~23.00	39.0	500~ 2 000
美国加州	Kern Front	Witmer B2-3	1982	477			蒸汽吞吐, 蒸汽驱	18.00	33.0	2 210
美国加州	Kern Front	Witmer B2-5	1982	595			蒸汽吞吐, 蒸汽驱	15.00	33.0	2 210
美国加州	South Belridge		1987	180	1 600	0.980	蒸汽驱	30.00	35.0	1 500~ 3 500
美国加州	Cat Canyon			1 051~1 318		1.014	蒸汽吞吐	107.00~ 152.00	30.0	450
美国怀俄明州	South Casper Creek		1990	790	600	0.975	蒸汽驱
美国怀俄明州	Winkleman Dome Nugget		1983	373	800~1 100	0.973	蒸汽驱	55.00	22.8	481
加拿大阿尔伯塔省	Athabasca	Glisp	1989	180~240	2 000 000		蒸汽驱	47.00	35.0
委内瑞拉	Tia Juana		1984—1985	305	2 000~6 000		蒸汽吞吐	24.00~51.00	38.1
委内瑞拉	Bolivar		1984—1986	300~650	100~10 000		蒸汽吞吐	20.00~ 120.00	30.0~38.0	750
罗马尼亚	Levantine- Moreni	Mio-Pliocen Area	1988		800	0.950	蒸汽驱	38.66	29.0	986

国外蒸汽泡沫驱矿场实施效果

Field Application of Steam Foam Flooding in Foreign Oilfields

RichHTML

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 6

参考文献 27

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	仲米虹, 唐武. 塔北地区三叠纪拗陷湖盆异重流沉积特征及主控因素[J]. 新疆石油地质, 2023, 44(1): 1-8.
[2]	张德梅, 段朝伟, 李高仁, 李永胜, 陆敬武, 林伟川. 华池—南梁油田长8油藏高阻水层解释方法[J]. 新疆石油地质, 2023, 44(1): 105-111.
[3]	李军, 唐博超, 韩东, 卢海涛, 耿春颖, 黄米娜. 断控缝洞型油藏储集体发育特征及其连通关系——以塔河油田托甫台地区T单元为例[J]. 新疆石油地质, 2022, 43(5): 572-579.
[4]	许欣雨, 陈清华, 冀东生, 崔有维. 湖南慈利龙王洞岩溶发育特征及模式[J]. 新疆石油地质, 2022, 43(2): 145-152.
[5]	邓振龙, 王鑫, 谭龙, 张记刚, 陈超, 宋平. 玛湖凹陷致密砾岩油藏CO₂异步吞吐提高采收率[J]. 新疆石油地质, 2022, 43(2): 200-205.
[6]	岳宝林, 祝晓林, 刘斌, 陈存良, 王双龙. 气顶边水窄油环油藏开采中后期开发方式[J]. 新疆石油地质, 2022, 43(1): 102-106.
[7]	李岩, 张菂, 樊晓伊, 张金通, 杨瑞莎, 叶欢. 低渗透砂砾岩油藏二氧化碳驱提高采收率[J]. 新疆石油地质, 2022, 43(1): 59-65.
[8]	常泰乐, 杨元亮, 高志卫, 胡春余, 郑孝强, 张萌, 袁一平. 氮气泡沫在浅薄层超稠油油藏开发中的适用性[J]. 新疆石油地质, 2021, 42(6): 690-695.
[9]	魏兵, 张翔, 刘江, 蒲万芬, 李一波, 王晓超. 致密油藏提高采收率现场试验进展和启示[J]. 新疆石油地质, 2021, 42(4): 495-505.
[10]	吴伟, 张博. 太平油田强边底水稠油油藏剩余油赋存规律[J]. 新疆石油地质, 2021, 42(2): 173-178.
[11]	孙莹, 孙仁远, 刘晓强, 李淑霞. 基于竞争吸附的页岩气藏提高采收率机理[J]. 新疆石油地质, 2021, 42(2): 224-231.
[12]	邓长生, 张毅, 谢小飞, 米伟伟, 强娟, 宋珈萱. 延长石油探区延长组页岩总含气量综合预测模型[J]. 新疆石油地质, 2020, 41(3): 269-277.
[13]	何辉, 李军建, 乞照, 胥中义, 刘美荣, 朱玉双. 西峰油田N区长2₃储集层特征及敏感性评价[J]. 新疆石油地质, 2020, 41(3): 278-287.
[14]	魏攀峰, 郑力会, 纪成, 陈启龙, 黄颖, 樊爱彬. 非均质砾岩油藏绒囊流体辅助聚合物驱效果[J]. 新疆石油地质, 2020, 41(3): 307-313.
[15]	张娜, 朱元芮, 祝仰文, 李金潘, 魏翠华. 基于井筒离散模型的多元热流体吞吐机理[J]. 新疆石油地质, 2020, 41(3): 332-336.