新疆石油地质

新疆石油地质 ›› 2006, Vol. 27 ›› Issue (2): 208-209.

• 油藏工程 • 上一篇    下一篇

斜井、水平井IPR 方程的最优选择

刘成1, 高文君1, 宋文礼2, 唐喜鸣1   

  1. 1 中国石油吐哈油田分公司勘探开发研究院, 新疆哈密 839009;
    2.中国石油吉林油田分公司油藏工程部, 吉林松原 145038
  • 收稿日期:2005-06-22 修回日期:2005-06-22 出版日期:2006-04-01 发布日期:2020-10-30
  • 作者简介:刘成(1972-) , 男, 甘肃民勤人, 工程师, 采油工程,(Tel) 0902-2766446.

The Optimal Choice of IPR Equation for Deviated and Horizontal Wells

LIU Cheng1, GAO Wen-jun1, SONG Wen-li2, TANG Xi-ming1   

  1. 1. Reaserch Institute of Exploration and Development, Tuha Oilfield Company, PetroChina, Hami, Xinjiang 839009, China;
    2. Department of Reservoir Engineering, Jilin Oilfield Company, Petro China, Songyuan, Jilin 145038, China
  • Received:2005-06-22 Revised:2005-06-22 Online:2006-04-01 Published:2020-10-30

PDF

293

摘要： 利用6 种类型IPR 方程, 对文献[1]油藏模拟器生成数据进行了重新拟合, 得出不同IPR 方程在不同井斜角下的Vogel 参数值。数值分析结果为:Winggins-Russell-Jennings 方程拟合精度最好, Klins-Majcher 方程次之, Vogel 方程较差, Fetkovich 方程、Harrison 方程和Bendakhlia-Aziz 方程最差。表明Winggins-Russell -Jennings 方程和Klins-Majcher 方程比Vogel 方程更适用于描述不同井斜角下的IPR 方程, 而Fetkovich 方程、Harrison 方程和Bendakhlia-Aziz 方程的适应性相对较差。

关键词: 斜井, 水平井, 油井动态, 方程, 误差, 优选法

Abstract: The Vogel parameter values of different inclinations in different IPR equations are given by using six types of IPR equations and re-matching the generated data from the reservoir simulator of Literature [1]. The values analysis shows that Winggins-Russell-Jennings equation is the best, Klins-Majcher equation is good, Vogel equation is poor, and Fetkovich, Harrison and Bendakhlia-Aziz equations are the worst in matching accuracy, indicating Winggins-Russell-Jennings equation and Klins-Majcher equation are better used for describing the IPR equation of different inclinations than Vogel equation, while Fetkovich, Harrison and Bendakhlia-Aziz equations are of poor applicability.

Key words: deviated well, horizontal well, well performance, equation, error, optimal choice

中图分类号: